So you didn’t even bother to look at the papers I’ve posted? Color me shocked. If you’re going to go to the rodeo, you’d better learn how to get on a horse.
Oh, you thought I cared what you think and your same old tired websites. He axed the question not me.
I have long quit caring what you think, you are just another sellout for evolution. You can’t afford to look at the gaps in the theory since your entire life and livelihood is from selling out to a lie.
They are nothing more than justification for accepting a fraud.
Well, well I took one more look and guess who’s back. I have been waiting with baited breath for a reponse to how the term fittest is really any different than your wording least inadequate. Not supposing to get any answer to this, but; How do you suppose your geological friends come up with a time-line for Cambrian or pre-Cambrian? After you answer that one then explain how you in in the realm of biology put any age to your microbial artifacts? Lastly, if you cannot see any inconsistencies yet why is it that pre-cambrian equals small while any post-cambrian got big, if not just based on assumptions/presuppositions?