Posted on 01/26/2013 8:46:52 AM PST by bray
Were you a slave when you were called? Don’t let it trouble you—although if you can gain your Freedom, do so. 1 Cor 7:21
Why do we assume scientists are always right? It seems we are being scammed by some of the shiftiest salesmen on the planet beginning with their most questionable foundation of evolution. While they are intimidating and ridiculing Christians for their belief in an all powerful God, they are promoting a theory that has not made any progress in over a hundred and fifty years. This failure happened in spite of every scientist on the planet attempting to discover the holy grail of science, that elusive missing link between monkey and man.
Darwin invented this theory by the logical observations that every animal and plant seems to have a similarity and connection making an obvious chain from one animal to the next. His theory as everyone knows has life beginning randomly in a primordial soup forming the first life forms billions of years ago. Never mind this huge hole in the theory of how life could be formed in a soup that was previously sterilized at over a thousand degrees, you just accept it without explanation or even the slightest bit of logic. This crater is so big that the Darwinists eliminated it from their discussion and saying how it occurred is no longer part of evolution which is like saying starting the car has nothing to do with your destination?
In 1859 Darwin questioned his own theory in his book Origin of Species when he wrote, ” ...as this process of extermination [survival of the fittest] has acted on an enormous scale, so must the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed on the earth, be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the geological record.”
If he asked that question in today’s scientific community he would be called a denier and would be tossed out of the scientific community. After a century and a half it should be time for the scientific community to answer that basic question. Shouldn’t these archeologists be swimming in transitory species’ fossils yet they have not found any which can be confirmed.
Now if you simply ask the question of where life began you will soon be vilified and called a Bible thumping Neanderthal or as they would call it, the missing link. From the magic of life appearing forward evolutionists are very comfortable, since life forms have a continuity they can observe and theorize. First there were bacteria which formed into amoeba’s which evolved into plankton and then fish since they all occur in the ocean and live as well as adapt similarly to each other. There are no explanations of how or why they simply changed from single cells into fish other than you simply need to have faith in random defects turning into superior species rather than inferior or that it can be repeated, you just accept it.
The next step of evolution is moving from the ocean and onto the land which of course was the evolution of whales and whale type creatures which eventually became reptiles. The reptiles ruled the earth as dinosaurs for millions and millions of years until a random ice age happened which wiped them out instantly. This is where it becomes dicey since they are not sure the mammals developed while the dinosaurs were eating them and vice versa since the evolution from reptile to mammal is such a giant leap. Once again we have no transitory species or fossils of those species which makes you have to wonder why no examples of these defective reptiles becoming pure land creatures. You simply take another scientific leap of faith.
The other problem the Darwinists have is where is the missing link? During the early 20th century there was something the scientists called the evolutionary ladder that led to modern man. It began with Nebraska man (fraud) to Peking man (fraud) to Piltdown man (fraud) to Neanderthal (fraud) and then man began walking fully upright. Once that happened then they used their scientific brilliance and made the Black man into one of the lower man evolutions followed by Asian through Slavic, Gypsy, Jew, and then Aryan being the highest form of man which they then attempted to make a super race leading to gas chambers and ovens to purify the race. Good thing science has given up on that evolutionary idea.
Once again science was wrong as it moved away from simple curiosity and investigation and into an agenda driven science and has not moved from there since that time. For any scientist there would have to be millions and millions of transitory species moving from Ape to man, yet not one scientist has found a credible fossil. The evolutions from the ape to man has to have as many separate species as from reptile to ape, yet nothing. Every scientist knows if she finds this fossil she will have instant immortality as they have finally proved God a fake…er…evolution is true. Even the most basic logic has to tell you if they know where modern man first began in Iran on the Euphrates in the simplest of digging areas there should be a sea of those transitional ape/man species and yet they have not found any. Why? There is only one logical answer and that is that man did not evolve from the Great Apes but came from somewhere else. If there were millions of evolutions between Ape and Man which would take more evolutions than moving from amoeba to ape, it is statistically impossible for scientists to not find at least one! The odds have to be billions and billions to one not to find one of these missing links, yet that is exactly what has happened in over a hundred and fifty years of searching.
It really makes you wonder when science began losing its curiosity of the unknown. There had to be a time when science was as eager to disprove their theories as they are now to perpetuate their frauds? If they have not come up with a credible missing link by this time then what stops them from discarding the entire theory. Sure it is easy to say an amoeba looks like a fish and a lizard walking out of the water looks like a mammal. Then of course the Disney movie continues as a dog looks like a horse and when they go up on two legs the can go from monkey to ape to man, but did that actually happen? There is no proof that is what happened which is the giant hole in the theory they have to fill with consensus, intimidation and purging rather than evidence.
The giant question that is not allowed to be asked is, was life formed by a chain of events making them look similar and have continuity or did that similarity occur at creation? Did science actually invent a theory of our creation or are they simply observing the miraculous continuity of a perfect creator? These are questions science does not want to ask and are beginning to fear the answers. Why won’t today’s scientists ask the same logical question Darwin asked, "why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?"
Pray for America
When was that? I've reviewed your posts, and you haven't quoted anything since 49.
It is a bunch of evolutionists scientists who were lukewarm that they couldn’t prove it true used appropriate caution in analyzing the evidence but would not confirm the completely dismantled the claims that it was a fraud. There, fixed it for you.
More name calling, well done.
That's an amusing refrain, coming from someone so quick to accuse others of "thug tactics" and of being atheists and anti-God. Besides, I still haven't called you names. That would be something like "you're a sad, ignorant person who shows why it's not a good idea to cast pearls before swine." But I'd never say such a thing.
Except when the term is being used as short-hand for the whole naturalistic process as is common in everyday discourse about the subject.
Regardless, abiogenesis is unscientific hokum too, so it doesn't really matter.
When Jesus walked among us, He only had the Old Testament to study and by His words He affirmed them as right and true.
IOW where do you think the lies stop and the truth telling starts in the Bible? ‘Let every man be shown a liar and only God as the source of all truths.’
Also science is no longer science when it attempts to interpret history. There’s no such thing as historical science. Do you recall the scientific method requiring repeatable experiments?
Here are some links for your perusal - maybe you should study both sides of the creation evolution argument before claiming to defend God and long ages for the Earth and Universe - ehh?
101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth...And the Universe
http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
Dinosaur Shocker - 68 million year old T Rex w/ red blood cells
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/10021606.html#ixzz0VZChRzSL
New Chromosome Research Undermines Human-Chimp Similarity Claims
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2565348/posts
There is a difference between lying and simply getting it wrong. What would I change in the bible? An insistence that free markets are good for a start.
How would you know if free markets [capitalism] be good? Free markets are simply the idea that one is entitled to all the benefits of ones’ labor.
Think back to your school days, now if you really like the opposite then nobody flunks and nobody excels b/c the teacher [gov] wants to be fair so the smartest and hardest working are robbed of their grades to ‘give’ the stupid and lazy the same average C grade for all. The book by Paul Bunyon ‘Pilgrims Progress’ describes the major flaw in this system - it robs all of the incentives to keep working harder and smarter.
None of us have enjoyed free markets as the founding fathers intended since we have had 100+ years of creeping socialism beginning [in the early 1900s] with the secretive Federal Reserve ‘Bank’ [think of it as a gov credit card where the people make the payments] and unconstitutionally ‘passed’ 16th amendment on a graduated income tax [did not get 3/4 ratification by the states].
Sadly, just like your obvious lack of knowledge regarding creation, you are also quite lacking on American history. This is really abhorrent for someone who became a freeper within 1 year of its inception!
Please please please study the Bible and read as much as you can get your hands on that is outside of the mainstream groupthink. Please?
You won’t find imho any scientific text better than creationscience.com.
It is a free online book explaining all scientific disciplines in everyday language, yet also provides hundreds of other science references both pro-creation and pro-evolution. I bought 2 of the hard back versions for far less than any of the texts I was required to attain in college - approx $20 for the 7th edition and $30 for the 8th edition [approx 100 pages more].
IF YOU ONLY READ ONE BOOK, OTHER THAN THE BIBLE,
PLEASE DO READ:
CREATIONSCIENCE.COM
Dr. Walt Brown PhD studied and believed evolutionary science for a while before he saw the lies and returned to his biblical roots [raised Methodist]. His entire life is an amazing journey that shows why we can trust the Bible completely but should always question the motives and progress of all mankind.
Nateman and all fellow freepers:
Sorry if my replies come off somewhat harsh, but it is my nature.
I’d rather grab your attention with my words rather than pacify anyone into a sweet little coma with insincere compliments and nice sounding twaddle.
Just trying to wake up the brethren while there’s still time is all.
I was an atheist most of my life because of this insistence on the creation myth. I came to God because I started to notice His unseen hand at work. I arrived at God by reason and have come to accept Him by realizing I don't have to accept all the nonsense He has been claimed to be associated with! The best example of evil done in God's name is Islam and it surly is the work of the opposition because it sure makes God look bad if it was true. (Which is why Islam , the "true religion", EXPLICITLY encourages it followers to lie about Islam!)
I have never believed in Darwinism. But FYI, the Euphrates is in Iraq, and the plural of amoeba is amoebas, not amoeba’s.
So a typo makes this invalid? What is your point?
Pray for America
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.