Posted on 01/16/2013 8:56:59 AM PST by Old Sarge
For those of us following The Won's address to his subjects.
Limbaugh is saying the NRA is angering the media and the left by attacking Obama. He is reading a article written by some leftist who is bashing the NRA. Limbaugh saying Obama has protection and has security. But Americans are being attacked for securing themselves. In fact, Rush says Obama’s kids are not in danger because they get protection. So a NRA ad came out bashing Obama for hypocrisy. Rush also says Obama is creating chaos, fear and anger in the country.
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/video/new-nra-ad-watch-and-tell-me-what-you-think/
http://twitchy.com/2013/01/16/matt-yglesias-obamas-kids-are-worth-more-than-yours/
And what group is all these “mental health initiatives” targeting?
VETERANS!
That’s the 23 EO’s?
#’s 2 and 3 seem to be all about intimidating states. I don’t see a single one that actually “addresses gun violence” - with the exception of #18... shocking that this one is there, though it’s meaningless as presented.
Joe Biden wrote all those letters.
Those are the EO’s?
That is how they are going to start removing guns. It may only be violent or psychotic people first, but then it will expand to other “conditions”. Everything in your medical history will be input into the database for background checks. Soon, they will be able to deny or revoke a permit based on you being a risk.
That is how they are going to start removing guns. It may only be violent or psychotic people first, but then it will expand to other “conditions”. Everything in your medical history will be input into the database for background checks. Soon, they will be able to deny or revoke a permit based on you being a risk.
...and stop more lemonade stands.
Valerie Jarrett the Iranian?
He will not outline or talk about his 23 EO’s because he does not want the low information voters to know about them. He knows they will have to actually read something to know what they are - and they will not bother to read (if they can).
NRA servers must be near meltdown right about now...how many members will be added today?
“2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.”
There goes hairy reid’s ‘gift’ to the NRA in obamacare. Pop goes the weasel.
Lucky, there is no tinfoil involved.
My sentiments exactly. This is scarey stuff. I fear for our freedoms
“should surround himself with the children whose rights he is eating”.
-—that would be more than Obama could even wish for, so let’s not give him that one. Bringing “Second Amendment Children “ into the dialogue would create an optic and a dynamic that would polarize the upcoming generation the children represent, one group against another,which is just what Obama is doing with their parents.
“Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature. … it is the greatest absurdity to suppose it in the power of one, or any number of men, at entering into society, to renounce their essential natural rights, or the means of preserving those rights; when the grand end of civil government, from the very nature of its institution, is for the support, protection, and defense of those very rights; the principal of which, as is before observed, are Life, Liberty, and Property. If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.”– Samuel Adams, The Rights of the Colonists, The Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, Nov. 20, 1772
LOL. Precisely.
The King’s decree has no meaning to me.
God Bless Texas!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
