Posted on 12/31/2012 9:54:19 AM PST by marktwain
Let me explain, gun grabbers, how your confiscatory fantasy plays out. Let us imagine for a moment that a sweeping gun control bill similar to the one currently suggested is passed by the House and Senate, and signed into law by a contemptuous President.
Perhaps 50-100 million firearms currently owned by law-abiding citizens will become contraband with the stroke of a pen. Citizens will either register their firearms, or turn them in to agents of the federal government, or risk becoming criminals themselves. Faced with this choice, millions will indeed register their arms. Perhaps as many will claim theyve sold their arms, or had them stolen. Suppose that as many as 200-250 million weapons of other types will go unregistered.
Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves.
They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush.
After a number of carefully-planned, highly-publicized, and successful raids by the government, one or more will invariably end badly. Whether innocents are gunned down, a city block is burned to ash, or especially fierce resistance leads to a disastrously failed raid doesnt particularly matter.
(Excerpt) Read more at bob-owens.com ...
Good observation. There are obviously people on both sides of the political divide who completely miss the fundamental elements of this issue. Sadly, some of them even post here.
Yeah. That’s why the mighty US military disarmed the Taliban so easily.
I hope you are right. That is best case, and worth fighting for.
Personally, I think you're either a fool, or a Lefty plant, to post that.
Usual snot-like tripe from you.
Weak kneed or Tokyo Roses.
What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?
Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?...
The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalins thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...
We didnt love freedom enough.
And even more we had no awareness of the real situation....
We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.
--Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - The Gulag Archipelago
“there are many in the military who will not follow the order to shoot fellow Americans!”
True, but it will be a war with words:
1. They’ll never tell a member of the military to shoot an American, they call that American a “domestic terrorist” first.
2. They’ll never tell a member of the military to take guns, they’ll call them “sniper rifles” first.
Get the picture?
In reviewing the Chinese Cultural Revolution, the local police were told not to get involved as the Red Guard stole and tortured. This will be our situation.
And they will tell ‘em that disarming americans will be a cake walk.
Yep, “You’re only supporting local law enforcement but you can fire if they or you are fired upon.”
Oh, I disagree completely, with respect. Think of it - the most powerful government in the world, a navy matched by no other, an existing state organization, a polarized country containing spies and those loyal to the existing government - yeah, no chance of a successful revolution in America. But then, enough about 1776...
Can you provide a link? I can't find anything on NCR Machines (that aren't ATMs).
Local delivery of webbed gear and other cool stuff.
Lefty plant. Always been like that, no idea why he hasn’t been banned yet.
Just computer controlled machines of all stripes. Lathes, milling machines, grinders and such.
During the LA riots, while Korean shopkeepers on roof tops protected their property using semi-automatic rifles, the police were nowhere to be found.
While Reginald Denny was dragged from his truck and beaten savagely, the police were nowhere to be found.
Since it must be assumed, unless explicitly and convincingly contradicted, that the police will side with the gun-grabbers, the police will simply be completely unwelcome. Even if individual policemen gave up their uniforms and badges, there would be no way to create confidence that they were not siding with the gun-grabbers.
Unfortunately, the same must be said about the National Guard and other military. It must be assumed that their chain of command will support the gun-grabbers. Active military will have to recognize that gun confiscation is an unlawful order and resist their own chain of command. There is no way that uniformed military will be welcome if the government attempts to eliminate the Second Amendment.
You could write several novels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.