Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unhinged Chris Matthews Berates Conservative Guest 13 Times: 'Who's Paying Your Salary?'
NewsBusters ^

Posted on 12/11/2012 6:19:04 PM PST by chessplayer

An unhinged Chris Matthews on Tuesday berated a representative of Americans for Prosperity with the same question 13 times. Talking to Scott Hagerstrom, the Hardball anchor didn't seem to hear the answer, despite Hagerstrom repeating it over and over. Matthews fumed, "Well, who's paying your salary?" [See a montage video below. MP3 audio here.]

A calm Hagerstrom appeared on the show to discuss the just-passed right-to-work law in Mighican. He explained, "I work for Americans for Prosperity...This is about freedom for everybody." Matthews repeated over and over: "Who's paying your salary?...No, but who's paying your salary to do it? Who's paying your salary to do what you're doing right now?...Who's paying your– to do this today?"

At the end of the segment, Matthews whined, "Again, for the fifth time, who pays your salary?...Who pays your salary?" It was actually the 13th time he had asked the question.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Why are Republicans and your organization against unions? Because this is pretty much a union gutting operation. You would like to see-- you work for the Koch Brothers-- they don't like unions. Why are you working for them?

SCOTT HAGERSTROM (Americans for Prosperity) You know, I work for Americans for Prosperity. This is not about the Koch Brothers. This is about freedom for everybody.

MATTHEWS: Well, who's paying your salary?

HAGERSTROM: I work for Americans for Prosperity. We're a non-profit.

MATTHEWS: Who's paying your salary?

HAGERSTROM: Unions are– Americans for Prosperity. I came here to talk about the policy and this is about freedom. This is about economic liberty.

MATTHEWS: No, but who's paying your salary to do it? Who's paying your salary to do what you're doing right now?

HAGERSTROM: I just told you. Americans for Prosperity. We're a 501C4.

MATTHEWS [Incredulous]: What's that?

HAGERSTROM: And we've been advocating– I'm sorry?

MATTHEWS: Who's paying your– to do this today?

HAGERSTROM: We– I just told you. Americans for Prosperity.

MATTHEWS: You're not answering my question.

HAGERSTROM: We're a non-profit. I

MATTHEWS: We're not getting anywhere.

HAGERSTROM: I just told you what the answer is!


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: basil
Personally, I think a better question for Chrissy is WHY is anyone paying you a salary......

BTTT, it certainly isn't market demand.

21 posted on 12/11/2012 6:46:39 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
It's almost funny seeing old white men get a hate-on against old white men in general.


22 posted on 12/11/2012 6:48:26 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
Average Salary of a teacher ............... $40,065

Pfft, spare me

When teachers start getting paid for results, let me know.

Yes, the other aspects of your post are valid, teachers and their unions can kma.

23 posted on 12/11/2012 6:52:47 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

NABLA pays chris matthew’s salary.


24 posted on 12/11/2012 6:57:13 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Not to defend Mathews, but the answer he was looking for was David Koch. This is the kind of crap that hurts conservative credibility. Hagerstrom’s answer is no more valid than the guy at 7-11 if he told you that he worked for Americans who want frozen drinks.


25 posted on 12/11/2012 6:59:18 PM PST by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Chris doesnt have a problem with George Soros paying the salary of half the commies in the media.


26 posted on 12/11/2012 7:00:19 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
I channel surf the opposition during commercials on Kudlow and Fox and I heard this. I flipped the channel away after the third iteration. Occasionally one of Chrissie's quests says something interesting but never Matthews. Bullying is a bad and liberals are always going on about it, except when they are doing it.
27 posted on 12/11/2012 7:03:54 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Communist Enabler File.


28 posted on 12/11/2012 7:04:14 PM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

My cousin and her husband are retired teachers in the New York area.

They EACH receive a pension of nearly $100,000 per year.


29 posted on 12/11/2012 7:23:10 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (November 6, 2012.....A day that will live in infamy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Wouldn’t it have been great to see this man grab Mathews by the collar and punch him right in his friggin teeth.

I would pay a pretty penny to watch it.


30 posted on 12/11/2012 7:26:46 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Yes indeed, boycott Comcast, the corporate leadership is a reflection of MSNBC’s on air personalities, the nuts do not fall far from the Comcast tree, truly a crazy corporation, very elitist!


31 posted on 12/11/2012 7:32:30 PM PST by IslamE (epiphany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Melas

If that is the answer Chris was looking for why did he not say”In reality you work for Koch Bros.” Instead of harrassing this man with his crazed rantings.

By the way it sure sounds like you are defending Mathews.


32 posted on 12/11/2012 7:32:38 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Yes, Matthews was looking for that answer.

But that answer would be a lie.

Do you want Hagerstrom to lie?

Maybe I don’t understand your point ...


33 posted on 12/11/2012 7:37:43 PM PST by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

The libthugocracy is emboldened with Dear Leader’s re-election...


34 posted on 12/11/2012 7:54:23 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Not to defend Mathews, but the answer he was looking for was David Koch.
*********************
That may have been the answer Chrissy was wanting, but the guy does not work for Koch. He works for the AFP and it’s probably the Treasurer of that organization that pays him.


35 posted on 12/11/2012 8:06:05 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Who’s paying yours, Chrissy - they’re certainly not getting their money’s worth......


36 posted on 12/11/2012 9:10:53 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

I read somewhere that Chrissie Matthews has NOT payed any U.S.Federal Income taxes in something like five years. If that’s true he should have to pay, just like every other worker.


37 posted on 12/11/2012 9:17:20 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Drango

You can’t take the man out of the boy.


38 posted on 12/11/2012 10:30:39 PM PST by Sivad (Nor Cal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Melas
You're right, of course. If a liberal had tap danced around such a question, people here would have been properly outraged by it.
39 posted on 12/12/2012 12:53:07 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Interesting that forcing people into unions is a “good thing”
and giving them the choice is a “bad thing”.

Ah... the thought processes of a totalitarian leftist.


40 posted on 12/12/2012 1:00:21 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson