Posted on 11/15/2012 4:29:22 PM PST by hole_n_one
Just a few minutes ago on CNN, Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr reported that a high-placed source informed her that former CIA Chief David Petraeus will use his upcoming testimony to amend his previous testimony. According to this source, Petraeus will tell the closed door congressional hearing that he knew "almost immediately" that the September 11 anniversary attack on our Libyan consulate was a terrorist attack committed by the al-Qaeda-linked militia Ansar Al Sharia.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
the gamers were told by Sean Smith (AKA VileRat) that he saw someone in a uniform taking photos and that he would get back to them in the morning “if I am still alive”.
so essentially the gaming community knew it was terrorism 45 minutes before the attack, and everyone who read about it on Wired a day later knew it was terrorism....only the MSM and the Obama administration insisted it was a spontaneous protest, as if protests start after dark...
This is what I was thinking too. We were all surprised at the election results, so maybe he was too, and realized the gravity of what he had done.
“During the Bush administration whistle blowing was considered by the media as a the act of a hero.”
Yet, under the Obama Idiocracy, whistle-blowers are Considered ENEMIES OF THE SOCIALIST/MEDIA STATE
The "congressional aide" would be the late Chandra Levy, 24, who was actually an intern at the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The "congressional" part had to do with her, uh, friendship with Rep. Gary Condit (or Condidit, as he came to be known, owing to suspicions as to his possible involvement in her disappearance), D-CA18. She disappeared on 1 May 2001. Investigation revealed she had probably gone running in Rock Creek Park (where some female runners lose drivers licenses and others their lives). However, her body didn't turn up until more than a year later, in 2002. Condidit lost his primary and went on to become a less than successful Baskin-Robbins franchisee (Gary Condidnt?).
Now, Fort Marcy Park is a completely different death scene. Namely, that of Hillary's alleged boyfriend, Vince Foster, and fellow partner at the Rose Law Firm. At the time of his, er, suicide on 20 July 1993, Vince was deputy White House Counsel. Suspicions about the circumstances of his demise have caused "Fort Marcy Park" to become code for "gotten rid of by the Clintons".
“ummmm, it’s NOT TERRORISM... it’s WAR!!!”
Ummm...
If the Mainstream Media decides not to cover it, and cover it up instead, it’s just something “Those Crazy People!” talk about....
Have we learned nothing in the last 20 years? FACTS no longer matter, just the narrative.
And of course, what goes with that is round the clock solid personal protection force for him and his family.
This impeachment trial would only be about sex ....and death
bookmark
I think the same and pray I am correct.
Kind of wondered that myself.
Yes, sort of. But I’m trying not to get my hopes up.
Here are some possibilities I’ve considered:
1. Affair is not real. Emails and other evidence faked to see who took the bait. Holly may or may not know the truth. Bait would uncover who is looking where they don’t belong and who is willing to use it as blackmail.
2. Affair is real and is a side issue. Petraeus was being blackmailed by the WH all along. He was watching 0bama and his minions and puppeteers and waiting until he had enough evidence and the time was right to pounce. In order to shine the light on the corruption and treason in the WH, he had to admit the affair in order to remove it as a threat.
In either case 1 or 2, blackmail would be just one more sordid charge on top of all the rest out of the WH.
If the WH thought they could hold the affair over Petraeus’s head, they may have gotten a little careless and overreached.
3. Petraeus is just another opportunist who loved the power and the money and the fame and glory. He got caught with his pants down and now his world is crashing down and he is trying to salvage what he can.
I pray that either 1 or 2 is true, and not 3.
Consider for a moment the power Petraeus has had as CIA director. Do you suppose he might have used some of that power to satisfy his curiosity about the President? I would have! Under the guise of quashing rumors and leaks, he could have been asking questions in Kenya, Indonesia, or wherever the trail led. (Not saying he was born in Kenya, but not convinced it was Hawaii either. BC is bogus.) The CIA isn’t allowed to do much on US soil, but there are plenty of places in the world where Zippy has left footprints.
Well, the dude is a whore and a liar.
He definitely isn’t helping an already muddled series of events.
LOL
screwed the pooch
term originated from Navy of 1800s. Tom Wolfe popularized.
I have to believe the WH tried to blackmail the general into favorable testimony, and it was his fault for putting himself in that position; however once he indicated he would give accurate testimony they went into phase II which is making him out to be such a D-bag that NOTHING he says under oath will be taken seriously or will eclipse the “sex scandal” itself. Information is already coming out about classified material being found at his mistress’s house. At the end of the day the press will have him painted as the real security risk and orchestrator of a cover-up of his own.
Follow the money....See what you can find out about a safe being taken the night of the attacks.
Any other ties to the WH? Who in the WH did she see? Is her name on entry list etc?
Thanks hole_n_one. This is Zero’s *real* nightmare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.