Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Chris Wallace stupid?
Vanity | 11-10-2012 | Doghead

Posted on 11/11/2012 6:00:14 AM PST by DOGHEAD

If the FBI was investigating a "personal tradgedy"for a number of months.. Does the "personal tradgedy" not raise a severe concern of blackmail potential for the head of Intellegence. And if the investigation was ongoing by the FBI, who do they report to? Holder? So Holder did not know about this "personal tradgedy"and did not notify the Whitehouse ....UNTIL 3 days after the election? And Chris Wallace will not even ask about it? he calls it a "persoanl tradgedy" We could all be killed with people this stupid asking questions.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: petraeus; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: svcw

I know it did at one time and probably still does. Recall the legendary stories of Robert F. Kennedy being J. Edgar Hoover’s direct boss and how that went.


41 posted on 11/11/2012 7:20:09 AM PST by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Simcha7; All
OY VEY!

Here's My PS: # 2!

CONCERNING THE MAIN TOPIC...CHRIS WALLACE'S STUPIDITY!

Chris Wallace is an ARROGANT, SOCIALIST, TRUTH SPINNING BLABBING HEAD...HE IS SO FULL OF HIMSELF...AND THE OBAMA- DEMONRAT AGENDAS...HE NEEDS AN EMEMA OR TWO OR THREE!

LIKE FATHER...LIKE SON...THE ROTTEN APPLE DOES NOT FALL FAR FROM THE...TREE!

42 posted on 11/11/2012 7:28:27 AM PST by Simcha7 ((The Plumb - Line has been Drawn, T'shuvah/Return for The Kingdom of HaShem is at hand!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD
Move-on acolytes will be here in 5...4...3...2...


43 posted on 11/11/2012 7:28:33 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD

Did Israel Honey Trap David Petraeus?

November 9th, 2012 | Author: Patriot

With the breaking news on General Petraeus (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/cia-chief-petraeus-resigns-reportedly-over-affair-201305343–politics.html) you might be interested in taking a look at the Mondoweiss.net link (at the following New Statesman article) which broke the story about email exchanges with David Petraeus which US mainstream media ignored as well (as also mentioned on Press TV via http://tinyurl.com/proisraelbiasedmedia & http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEtASJOjDU8).


44 posted on 11/11/2012 7:39:23 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Tagline space for rent to pay for some of my extra taxes the next 4 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

YOU MAY BE RIGHT—ALWAYS FOLLOW THE MONEY.


45 posted on 11/11/2012 7:40:38 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bedford Forrest

A.k.a. Acute Bidenitis?


46 posted on 11/11/2012 7:47:34 AM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN
This morning on Fox wallace stated that it really doesn’t matter if Petraeus testifies to congress or not

Chris Wallace pretends to be unbiased. He is not. Chris Wallace is a closet liberal. He will bite the ankles of the Liberals in power but will never go for the jugular vein. He is a sell out to his profession. But the real hell of it is, that the most of his profession is far worse than him.

47 posted on 11/11/2012 7:49:07 AM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD

What “personal tragedy”? Did someone die of cancer? Did someone get run over by a car? We are reduced to calling a tragedy some perfumed prince banging super MILF. No tragedy here folks considering the aggrieved parties are a Moonbat and a Carnuto Contento.


48 posted on 11/11/2012 8:11:09 AM PST by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD

Rhetorical question, right?


49 posted on 11/11/2012 8:11:44 AM PST by relee ('Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD
I don't know if I'd be calling anyone stupid if I misspelled "tragedy" four times in my post.

Just sayin'.

50 posted on 11/11/2012 9:18:47 AM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD

To point out the blindingly obvious: only the National Security Agency should have the capability to intercept and decrypt the email of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

If the FBI can do it, with their modest cryptanalysis resources, then most of the more advanced foreign governments and certainly a lot of corporations could do so as well.

The CIA should be terribly upset right now that *anyone* could possibly read the email of its Director.

Of course the assumption is that his correspondence with this woman was “in the clear”, but *nobody* with a high level of authority in the CIA should be making in the clear communications unless they are vetted by their internal security before release.


51 posted on 11/11/2012 9:37:03 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOGHEAD

IMO, Wallace is a closet lib who has a great gig with Fox.


52 posted on 11/11/2012 10:04:15 AM PST by duckman (I'm part of the group pulling the wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne

But it turns out that even with the mis-spelled word,I was correct in asking the questions that I did.


53 posted on 11/11/2012 3:34:48 PM PST by DOGHEAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Average Al
The solution is clear. Remove all desks from government offices. ;-)

Nah, just remove the "privacy panels", that will get it done.

Regards,
GtG

54 posted on 11/11/2012 3:51:34 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
"Nah, just remove the "privacy panels", that will get it done."

Yeah, under the Freedom of Information Law. ;-)

55 posted on 11/11/2012 4:01:20 PM PST by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson