Posted on 11/11/2012 6:00:14 AM PST by DOGHEAD
If the FBI was investigating a "personal tradgedy"for a number of months.. Does the "personal tradgedy" not raise a severe concern of blackmail potential for the head of Intellegence. And if the investigation was ongoing by the FBI, who do they report to? Holder? So Holder did not know about this "personal tradgedy"and did not notify the Whitehouse ....UNTIL 3 days after the election? And Chris Wallace will not even ask about it? he calls it a "persoanl tradgedy" We could all be killed with people this stupid asking questions.
I know it did at one time and probably still does. Recall the legendary stories of Robert F. Kennedy being J. Edgar Hoover’s direct boss and how that went.
Here's My PS: # 2!
CONCERNING THE MAIN TOPIC...CHRIS WALLACE'S STUPIDITY!
Chris Wallace is an ARROGANT, SOCIALIST, TRUTH SPINNING BLABBING HEAD...HE IS SO FULL OF HIMSELF...AND THE OBAMA- DEMONRAT AGENDAS...HE NEEDS AN EMEMA OR TWO OR THREE!
LIKE FATHER...LIKE SON...THE ROTTEN APPLE DOES NOT FALL FAR FROM THE...TREE!
Did Israel Honey Trap David Petraeus?
November 9th, 2012 | Author: Patriot
With the breaking news on General Petraeus (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/cia-chief-petraeus-resigns-reportedly-over-affair-201305343politics.html) you might be interested in taking a look at the Mondoweiss.net link (at the following New Statesman article) which broke the story about email exchanges with David Petraeus which US mainstream media ignored as well (as also mentioned on Press TV via http://tinyurl.com/proisraelbiasedmedia & http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEtASJOjDU8).
YOU MAY BE RIGHT—ALWAYS FOLLOW THE MONEY.
A.k.a. Acute Bidenitis?
Chris Wallace pretends to be unbiased. He is not. Chris Wallace is a closet liberal. He will bite the ankles of the Liberals in power but will never go for the jugular vein. He is a sell out to his profession. But the real hell of it is, that the most of his profession is far worse than him.
What “personal tragedy”? Did someone die of cancer? Did someone get run over by a car? We are reduced to calling a tragedy some perfumed prince banging super MILF. No tragedy here folks considering the aggrieved parties are a Moonbat and a Carnuto Contento.
Rhetorical question, right?
Just sayin'.
To point out the blindingly obvious: only the National Security Agency should have the capability to intercept and decrypt the email of the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
If the FBI can do it, with their modest cryptanalysis resources, then most of the more advanced foreign governments and certainly a lot of corporations could do so as well.
The CIA should be terribly upset right now that *anyone* could possibly read the email of its Director.
Of course the assumption is that his correspondence with this woman was “in the clear”, but *nobody* with a high level of authority in the CIA should be making in the clear communications unless they are vetted by their internal security before release.
IMO, Wallace is a closet lib who has a great gig with Fox.
But it turns out that even with the mis-spelled word,I was correct in asking the questions that I did.
Nah, just remove the "privacy panels", that will get it done.
Regards,
GtG
Yeah, under the Freedom of Information Law. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.