Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney has fewer votes than John McCain received in 2008! Republicans stayed home
Various

Posted on 11/07/2012 1:14:10 AM PST by Arthurio

Mitt Romney has fewer votes than John McCain received in 2008! Republicans stayed home!

As of right now, Romney has close to 56,000,000 votes nationwide. In 2008, John McCain had nearly 60,000,000 votes. (Per Wikipedia)

It looks like if all the people who voted for McCain turned out again and voted for Romney, we would have been rid of the Kenyan once and for all.

People stayed home.

It looks like all the Freepers who said they'd never vote for Mitt were not making idle threats


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-256 next last
To: reaganaut

Welcome back to Obamaland


61 posted on 11/07/2012 2:05:02 AM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

The only way to get Rino out is for conservatives to run for committee chairmen and win. It only costs about $10 to register in the primary.

Only the elected people can vote on GOP leadership positions. Committee chairs will also have a big influence in their Ward on the vote for conservative candidates in the national and state primaries.

Without building a grass roots base, conservatives are at a big disadvantage. The GOPe is also going to go out of its way to try to get the Latino voters, and they really treat conservatives like the Dems treat the Black population.


62 posted on 11/07/2012 2:06:02 AM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Well I certainly wouldn’t put massive fraud past the Dems, but we need solid evidence or at least a trail.

The exit polling backs up the vote totals so that’s a dead end.

So we would need to identify specific areas that have large anomalies in numbers, like assumed Romney precincts that magically went big for Obama, or Obama counties that are at 110 percent of voters. Things like that.

Without that it’s just loser talk frankly. I think the totals show (when completed) that Romney pulled all the votes a Republican is gonna get, and Dems came out less than 2008 to vote for Obama, but in enough numbers to squeak out a win in the necessary swing states.

Even when we are fired up and in full force there aren’t enough of us anymore compared to the various growing minority populations and traditional Dem diehards like women gays and unions.


63 posted on 11/07/2012 2:06:47 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: All

Bullshit! Obama won but not honestly. Romney certainly was better than McCain.


64 posted on 11/07/2012 2:08:45 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

The Republican party is over. We need a new party with a new platform. That’s what freepers should work on now.


65 posted on 11/07/2012 2:11:18 AM PST by thenewsblogger (Nancy from another planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
"But the total number of Conservatives - voting or not - is not growing."

That's not correct. Since Obama appeared on the scene, twice as many voters have identified themselves as "conservative" in polls as have said they were "liberal." Additionally, party ID has changed from a 12-point Democrat advantage in 2008 to a 3-point Republican advantage (Gallup) in 2012. And every reputable poll indicated a huge enthusiasm advantage for Republicans this year. So we're supposed to believe that given a proportionally larger pool of Republicans to draw from, combined with a 2:1 advantage in philosophical leaning and a massive advantage in enthusiasm (not to mention universal anecdotal reports of actual massive turnout) that we did no better than we did in 2008? That doesn't make any sense at all.

66 posted on 11/07/2012 2:11:31 AM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
"But the total number of Conservatives - voting or not - is not growing."

That's not correct. Since Obama appeared on the scene, twice as many voters have identified themselves as "conservative" in polls as have said they were "liberal." Additionally, party ID has changed from a 12-point Democrat advantage in 2008 to a 3-point Republican advantage (Gallup) in 2012. And every reputable poll indicated a huge enthusiasm advantage for Republicans this year. So we're supposed to believe that given a proportionally larger pool of Republicans to draw from, combined with a 2:1 advantage in philosophical leaning and a massive advantage in enthusiasm (not to mention universal anecdotal reports of actual massive turnout) that we did no better than we did in 2008? That doesn't make any sense at all.

67 posted on 11/07/2012 2:11:31 AM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

I don’t know if you were watching but I was. At about midnight Fla. and Va. were looking good for the GOP. Fla was down by something like 20,000 votes but the panhandle wasn’t in yet. The GOP had Va by something like 100,000 votes with most of the vote in and Zero wasn’t catching up. North Carolina had clearly gone GOP by 3% or so with 97% of the vote in but they wouldn’t call it for the GOP. I kept asking myself why not when all of a sudden they give Ohio to Dear Leader when the GOP has been coming from 10% behind at 30% of the vote in to LESS THAN 1,000 votes to go and not quite 75% of the vote in??? Really? Then our guy gives the speech he was carefully selected for. Having done the job he came to do he now returns to obscurity. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? If this isn’t what a stolen election looks like I don’t know what is. Lines all over the states that were critical? For THE FIRST TIME EVER. Of course Hugo doesn’t have to give a crap but Zero had to make this “appear fair”. So they had to slow down the voting here and there so at midnight they could “take care of business”. And they did.


68 posted on 11/07/2012 2:11:55 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

“Real simple.

Nominate a conservative from a solid red state.

Nominate a conservative who’s prolife

Nominate a conservative who supports traditional marriage.

It’s just that simple.”

No it isn’t. Gay marriage has been a loser for the Dems but they keep at it. This time they got 3 states to join their cause. Drip drip drip. One day it will be the norm and to oppose it makes you a fringe freak.

Your perfect conservative candidate who doesn’t exist anyway is becoming a relic. He or she ain’t pulling 65+ million votes to beat the Dem.


69 posted on 11/07/2012 2:14:34 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cherry
who says fewer pubs voted?....isn't that convenient?....if the pub votes aren't counted, then they didn't vote?... I'm suggesting that pub votes were tossed or changed... there was true momentum and true numbers out there for Romney... fewer voters?....hardly...every report around the country said the polls were packed.... fraud that will ever be proven or even investigated...

Massive. Vote. Fraud. They saw in 2010 when we handed them their asses that 2012 would be a blowout if there was an honest election. If it is not dug out and stomped the House will be next in '14.

70 posted on 11/07/2012 2:14:46 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks like Right-Wing extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Exit polling was BS in Bush's race, just ask Algore.
I thinking Romney votes not counted, Romney votes switched to Obobo, and fraudulent Obobo votes added.
Probably just the right mixture.
We all knew the Rats were going to do vote fraud, is just a matter of figuring out how and how much.
71 posted on 11/07/2012 2:15:34 AM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Even when we are fired up and in full force there aren’t enough of us anymore

This was my pessimistic conclusion in the weeks leading up to the election. I could definitely see that Rs were fired up, and I could understand the optimism people felt from the anecdotal observations they were having. But my nagging intuition was that the country had reached a demographic point where even a largely passive Democrat voting bloc would nevertheless overtake the GOP come election day.
72 posted on 11/07/2012 2:16:31 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

Voters were Dem +6 yesterday. Just like the supposed “skewed” polls said. there was no GOP advantage this year that was a myth I bought into also.


73 posted on 11/07/2012 2:17:16 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Exactly! And with the Ministry of Prop...Truth to decide what we “need to know” and Joseff Holder at his back Dear Leader need not be concerned that the public EVER have to deal with what has happened. Nixon “stood down” for JFK for “the good of the country, that Americans not have to realize the compromise of integrity of their vote”. The one we sent did likewise it seems but he should not have. This result should be challenged IMMEDIATELY! Before the sun rises. Of course the GOP would never do that. That would just be so unseemly. Just not Marquis of Queensbury and all, you know? The GOP is just so good at losing...


74 posted on 11/07/2012 2:19:37 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: thenewsblogger
We need a new party with a new platform.

And that platform is elegantly simple: smaller government. Easy to explain, not racist, and immediately understandable to voters.

75 posted on 11/07/2012 2:20:48 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Come on. Massive voter fraud would be easily caught. Romney’s team knows what their numbers were internally. If Obama had some huge gains in places or other anomalies they knew they were going to win, and that was a pattern, they would not have conceded. Unless part of your theory is Romney was in on it too. Then I guess it doesn’t matter anyway because he wasn’t the guy we voted for.

We just don’t have the votes. Sucks and believe me I hoped for better. but now we know.


76 posted on 11/07/2012 2:21:41 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain

Philly has voted 107% Dem for decades. Check it yourself. Then come back and we can talk about why the GOP has let that occur time after time. Still believe what the Ministry of Truth has to say?


77 posted on 11/07/2012 2:23:53 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

People understand small government. That was probably the biggest debate in this election. The choice was clear. Our fellow citizens by a larger number voted to keep big government. Sandy helped reinforce that the wonderful prez flying around waving FEMA money


78 posted on 11/07/2012 2:24:28 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

ping 4 later


79 posted on 11/07/2012 2:24:37 AM PST by diverteach (If I find liberals in heaven after my death.....I WILL BE PISSED!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
I can believe that Republicans stayed home. I have an on-line conservative T-shirt business. We sold more Sarah Palin T-shirts this year than Romney T-shirts.

This election cycle, I did 10% of the business I did in 2010.

80 posted on 11/07/2012 2:26:38 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson