[over3Owithabrain]

Well I certainly wouldn’t put massive fraud past the Dems, but we need solid evidence or at least a trail.

The exit polling backs up the vote totals so that’s a dead end.

So we would need to identify specific areas that have large anomalies in numbers, like assumed Romney precincts that magically went big for Obama, or Obama counties that are at 110 percent of voters. Things like that.

Without that it’s just loser talk frankly. I think the totals show (when completed) that Romney pulled all the votes a Republican is gonna get, and Dems came out less than 2008 to vote for Obama, but in enough numbers to squeak out a win in the necessary swing states.

Even when we are fired up and in full force there aren’t enough of us anymore compared to the various growing minority populations and traditional Dem diehards like women gays and unions.

[The Cajun]

Exit polling was BS in Bush's race, just ask Algore.
I thinking Romney votes not counted, Romney votes switched to Obobo, and fraudulent Obobo votes added.
Probably just the right mixture.
We all knew the Rats were going to do vote fraud, is just a matter of figuring out how and how much.

[Utmost Certainty]

Even when we are fired up and in full force there aren’t enough of us anymore

This was my pessimistic conclusion in the weeks leading up to the election. I could definitely see that Rs were fired up, and I could understand the optimism people felt from the anecdotal observations they were having. But my nagging intuition was that the country had reached a demographic point where even a largely passive Democrat voting bloc would nevertheless overtake the GOP come election day.

[wastoute]

Philly has voted 107% Dem for decades. Check it yourself. Then come back and we can talk about why the GOP has let that occur time after time. Still believe what the Ministry of Truth has to say?

[Arthurio]

Bush received 62 million votes in 2004. That would have been enough.