Posted on 10/25/2012 9:58:14 AM PDT by Nachum
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered additional security for the U.S. mission in Benghaziahead of the terrorist attack but the orders were never carried out, according to “legal counsel” to Clinton who spoke to best-selling author Ed Klein. Those same sources also say former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsninja2012.com ...
If you throw in Jarrett and Axelrod, I vote for “too arrogant”.
Unless it were a direct order from POTUS to cut security, why would the SoS need POTUS authorization for diplomatic security?
That would be like a local Bank of America branch needing approval from the corporate CEO to hire an additional security guard.
==
If POTUS is making decisions on that level, he doesn’t need a SoS.
BOOM - this is big! Tweet it Facebook it Send it to Drudge!
The Clintons have decided to cut their losses. I was wondering how long it would take.Hillary wants to be viable for 2016. Period.
Potentially hugh and series!
Reported anywhere else? Haven’t seen this at other sites.
>> One must remember that the typical Obama supporter doesn’t care whether Obama denied security to the consulate or not. <<
Actually, the typical Obama supporter doesn’t even know that there’s an issue with Benghazi, much less any of the details discussed in forums like this. They are truly clueless, which is why the MSM still has so much power.
When this is all over, IF Romney wins, some serious thought has to be given to raising the bar in grade schools and high schools so that kids reaching the age of 18 have some understanding of the basic principles upon which our country was founded. Otherwise it’s just a matter of time....assuming it’s not already too late.
I should add, in fairness, that far too many Romney voters are also clueless about Benghazi, again due to the complicity of the MSM.
Diplomad posted that he thought Stevens only nominally reported to Clinton. Makes sense.
Intelligence.
I have said from the beginning that Benghazi had the hallmarks of CIA but people didn’t think so. They thought he was an ordinary Ambassador.
Not so.
He got his orders from someone other than Clinton.
Drudge has up that Clinton might stay in her position a big longer- whatever that means.
And I don’t buy that B&C are having fights about releasing info.
That is just to make her look good.
That's why it's been nigh impossible to erode the Bamster's base. They are behind a firewall of ignorance.
Wrong Party.............to see that happen.
No more spiking of the football by the dems with the death of Bin Laden w/out invoking the death of Amb. Stevens and 3 other Americans.
“Haven’t seen this at other sites.”
And you won’t. This won’t be covered at all. The media is counting on the fact that only political wonks like us will be aware of it. And, even if Obama supporters become aware, they won’t care. They’ll be weighing four dead Americans compliments of Obama against free ‘Bamaphones. The ‘Bamaphones will win.
Er... Hillary's 'viability' left the toothpaste tube a long time ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
