Posted on 10/17/2012 12:44:33 PM PDT by MNDude
It is SOOO obvious that the Crowley "fact check" was coordinated with Obama in advance.
At: :14 Romney starts he statement about how Obama did not call the attack terrorism.
At :29 Obama smugly tells Romney to proceed.
At :38 Obama tells Crowley "Get the transcript!"
At: :39 (possibly before the word transcript even completely leaves Obama's mouth) Crowley states "he did infact"
So, we are to believe that amoung hundreds of speeches, policies, political ads, and actions of the two candidates, that Crowley was able to find and fact check the transcript of that exact particular speech within zero seconds?
Even if she decided to stop worring about what her next question would be, and immediately start fact checking at the transcripts :14 seconds, that would given her only 25 seconds to find and verify that statement.
I challenge anyone to try to verify any statement at some Rose Garden speech within 25 seconds, let alone ZERO seconds!!
I rarely subscribe to conspiracies, but there's no way you can explain this other than a huge setup.
I bet Obama was given a copy of every question he and Romney would have been asked last night!
... and the order in which they would be given
It is SOOO obvious that the Crowley “fact check” was coordinated with Obama in advance.
At: :14 Romney starts he statement about how Obama did not call the attack terrorism.
At :29 Obama smugly tells Romney to proceed.
At :38 Obama tells Crowley “Get the transcript!”
At: :39 (possibly before the word transcript even completely leaves Obama’s mouth) Crowley states “he did infact”
Do you blame leftist thugs for being leftist thugs, or do you blame the RNC for allowing 100% leftist moderators ?
There was collusion here obviously. Someone should be spending a little time behind bars.
Maybe we should all “lighten up”. What’s the problem? The LIB/Lefty crowd is just trying to steal the election.
And she lifts a sheet of paper up to show she, in fact, had it in hand.
You are right; it happens on schedule just about every four years.
” There was collusion here obviously. Someone should be spending a little time behind bars.”
Yes
“And she lifts a sheet of paper up to show she, in fact, had it in hand.”
What else should we expect ?
Here’s my take on it from another thread this morning:
From an interview after the debate, Crowley said,
“I, sort of, reread a lot of stuff about Libya because I knew we’d probably get a Libya question so I kind of wanted to be up on it,” said Crowley.
TRANSLATION:
“I definitely reread a lot of stuff about Libya because the president’s staff told me to be ready to defend him since he was going to lie about it, as he would do the whole evening. We knew Romney was going to bring it up when our planted Libya question came up so I really wanted to be able to stun Romney by double-teaming him when he told the truth. Then I walked it back a bit to appear impartial. In my opinion, I pulled it off perfectly.” said Crowley.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.