Posted on 10/16/2012 9:05:02 PM PDT by The Wizard
Hannity just announced that Candy Crowley has announced that she was wrong and Romney was right.....
Peoria is too big a venue for her. I recommend Bono, Ohio...
She should have kept her mouth shut and let it drop. Instead, she couldn’t resist the motherly urge to support poor widdle Bammy. And she ended up looking as stupid as he did.
When I heard the comment about some jobs will never come back, as I recall it was McCain that got totally skewered in the last election for saying something similar.
The question that must be answered though is if Obama has a foreign policy record he can defend. And time needs to be spent on what he meant by being more flexible with Russia if he wins again.
This is from her opening statement tonight:
Crowley: "My goal is to give the conversation direction and to ensure questions get answered."
She overstepped her own guidelines a bit didn't she. Must be she believes interfering, taking sides, and affirming false info is giving the conversation direction.
And the Packers think they were screwed by replacement refs.
I can remember Candy Crowley from way back and she is as phony looking as B.Hussein Obama is as a President.
I sent an email to CNN..just for the fun of it...stating that some how, some way the Presidential Debates in the future need some new policies in selecting moderators...they just can't all be ONE SIDED.. I personally though she did a terrible job, lost control and looked very un-professional for a so called journalist or network spokesperson...what ever her title is... I never watch CNN any longer...say ten years or so, just can't tolerate them......
as a hairdresser for over 42+years I suggest ‘when older, shorter is better and more stylish’ but hell I'm just an old lady saying that...
She sure looked pretty slovenly tonight. I can’t believe she actually wanted to be seen in millions of households looking like a ragamuffin. She looked like Jabba the Hut with long hair.
And easier to care for. I'm 65, and have worn my hair short for many years. I hadn't thought of her going for the Hillary look until you mentioned it, but you could be right. Sadly, it doesn't work for either of them. It only makes them look worse than they already are.
“Pay inequality for women”
Well, it was just a stupid kid who asked it. Funny enough, both kinda admitted it’s due at least in part to actual differences between men and women, so that the 72% or whatever figure is BS for comparing apples and oranges. Shocking to me was how Obama saved the “war on women” bit for the second round.
By the way, why did so many stupid kids ask questions? What percent of voters are 20 year-olds? Negative 5?
I keep hearing stories about a debating commission with members from both sides endlessly nitpicking over every detail down to the Colorado of the carpet. So why do we always get moderator’s like her? Aside from the MSM being overwhelmingly lib and consequently the pickins being slim, what’re the odds? And why do we stand for it?
I keep hearing stories about a debating commission with members from both sides endlessly nitpicking over every detail down to the color of the carpet. So why do we always get moderators like her? Aside from the MSM being overwhelmingly lib and consequently the pickins being slim, what’re the odds? And why do we stand for it?
Hillary is right to use the lighter color but the length and style of her hair is for one maybe in their thirty's or forties but not one climbing up on seventy... just one more comment...I thought after ten minuets that Obama had advance notice of all questions, his answers just too fast and pat down...then by ten p.m was sure this was a fixed debate and FAKE, PHONY, AND A FRAUD.... NITE FREEPERS..LOVE UN'S.
Yes, I was hoping Romney would come back with: "I won't accept that as a premise. Given a level playing field, we can compete with anyone. America has its people, its freedom, fabulous resources if allowed to tap them, and even many geographic advantages. We can succeed economically against anyone, if we just take off the chains that are dragging us down. I refuse to give up on any jobs, and I will fight every day for good jobs for everyone who wants one."
The point should also be made that once one can create high demand for workers, instead of high demand for work, the businesses needing workers will find ways to accomplish worker training, rather than have the Gov't try to guess what will be needed.
BTW, I am not just talking about in-house training, though much more of that used to occur. Businesses can also harder and contribute more in a variety of ways with local colleges, technical schools, and the like.
When it’s an employers’ market, though, employers will often wait for the “perfect” applicant to show up.
The problem with this is: Romney could have hit harder. The fact is, that Obama did say “terrorist attacks” in his Rose Garden speech when he addressed the Benghazi murders.
Now, the waters are muddy when we were making headway.
This will definitely be addressed in the next debate, which is all about foreign policy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.