Posted on 10/05/2012 6:02:49 PM PDT by ReformationFan
Redefining marriage won't satisfy gay rights activists; they want to redefine reality.
Segregating genders in marriage to suit the sexual attractions of less than 2% of the population isn't enough. This woman with same-sex attraction wants scientists to "try harder" and give "priority" to making it possible for two women to procreate. Michelle Cheever says: "I want to have babies the way straight people do."
Huffington Post:
What I mean is that I want the ease, the convenience, the — dare I say it — naturalness that straight people have when starting a family. I want both the simple beauty of two people loving each other so much that they'd like to see more of the other in the world, and I want that simple beauty to be translated into scientific terms of fairness: chromosomes and DNA given in equal amounts from two parents.
The attitude I have always taken to having a baby with another woman has been this: "It's not fair! It's so hard! Why me?"
I am a total brat about what I consider a biological injustice. . .
Why can't my girlfriend and I have a baby that shares our DNA? Why can't an egg from each of us be scrambled up and sprinkled with sperm? It seems so easy! Try harder scientists! Make this a priority.
Instead of urging scientists to "try harder," Cheever might as well demand that science try harder.
"Biological injustice"? What's next — are they going to sue their bodies for justice?
The problem with same-sex marriage is not that so-called anti-gay bigots oppose it. The challenge that gender segregationists face is their own biology, not hatred. SSM activists battle nature, not just culture. The problem is reality, not politics.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
So what I want to know—is why don’t they just marry each other, change outfits, call the male the wife and female the husband and be happy?
JUDITH: I do feel, Reg, that any Anti-Imperialist group like ours must reflect such a divergence of interests within its power-base.
REG: Agreed. Francis?
FRANCIS: Yeah. I think Judith’s point of view is very valid, Reg, provided the Movement never forgets that it is the inalienable right of every man—
STAN: Or woman.
FRANCIS: Or woman... to rid himself—
STAN: Or herself.
FRANCIS: Or herself.
REG: Agreed.
FRANCIS: Thank you, brother.
STAN: Or sister.
FRANCIS: Or sister. Where was I?
REG: I think you’d finished.
FRANCIS: Oh. Right.
REG: Furthermore, it is the birthright of every man—
STAN: Or woman.
REG: Why don’t you shut up about women, Stan. You’re putting us off.
STAN: Women have a perfect right to play a part in our movement, Reg.
FRANCIS: Why are you always on about women, Stan?
STAN: I want to be one.
REG: What?
STAN: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me ‘Loretta’.
REG: What?!
LORETTA: It’s my right as a man.
JUDITH: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
LORETTA: I want to have babies.
REG: You want to have babies?!
LORETTA: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.
REG: But... you can’t have babies.
LORETTA: Don’t you oppress me.
REG: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb! Where’s the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!
LORETTA: crying
JUDITH: Here! I— I’ve got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can’t actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody’s fault, not even the Romans’, but that he can have the right to have babies.
FRANCIS: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister. Sorry.
REG: What’s the point?
FRANCIS: What?
REG: What’s the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can’t have babies?!
FRANCIS: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
And once again, we have here an excellent example of how the human brain has been totally debilitated by the chronic, non-curable disease of liberalism. Their diseased minds have no logic or objective reasoning skills whatsoever. As the disease progresses, they become prone to violence which we’ve all witnessed many times. Not only are these soulless bodies nuttier than a fruitcake, they are also potentially very dangerous!
REG: Symbolic of his struggle against reality.
People so violently opposed to nature and reality, deserve to have nature and reality bite them right in the fundament.
When unnatural unreality comprises 2 percent of the world, and it’s sole role in our society is to change the other 98 percent to fit its own image, any effort by the 98 percent to cut the 2 percent an even break, is nihilistic and tantamount to cultural suicide.
Is this for real?
Thank you! Thank you for posting this! I have been so sad today and this was a much needed laugh!
"Biological injustice"!! HAHAHAHAHA~~~~
They’re insane.
Homosexualism was correctly diagnosed more than 50 years ago as a mental illness.
It is a quixotic battle against reality.
Delusional, absurd, ridiculous, not to mention filthy, dirty, disease-prone, even hazardous.
These people need to be confined to a rubber room.
The late great Herbert Lom couldn’t portray their insanity as well as they do.
It may sound simplistic, but there is a strong element of truth to that. Male homosexuals tend to have very low testosterone, very high estrogen, or both, while the reverse is true for females. What I find particularly bizarre is that a person with low testosterone and high estrogen should be attracted to the reverse - a straight man or a lesbian woman - yet they end up with like people. If gay men like men, then why do they choose extremely effeminate partners? Similarly, why do lesbian couples usually look like a pair of hockey players?
You would probably need to reverse the direction the beer is flowing and increase by an order of magnitude if this loon is physically similar to 80% of the dykes I have encountered in my life.
Nature works much better when you don’t ABOMINATE it.
The socio-biological fitness of two members of the same sex is ZERO.
42 post before a Monty Python reference.
What has Free Republic come to!
(I was thinking about the “Every Sperm is Sacred” song but realized that in the case of the sperm that created this moonbat, that really wasn’t true.)
Why can't my girlfriend and I have a baby that shares our DNA? Why can't an egg from each of us be scrambled up and sprinkled with sperm? It seems so easy! Try harder scientists! Make this a priority.
Yeah, cause that's how normal married people do it too, right. What a whacko!
That sure would be natural.
Oh Lord, I will make it even easier on You — make liberalism disappear.
Mentally. Ill.
Alas post a link to the same YouTube on 31.
I’ve got slow internet, so I don’t like to wait for video.
But even at 31, what has it all come down to?
No picture?
Without a picture of Ms Cheever, how can we determine if she’s guilty or not guilty?
Oh...wait a minute...nevermind..
Can’t wait for Laz to chime in so ... “it depends on the Female” weather or not I’d HIT IT
Judges may say it doesn’t matter what your relationship was ... donors = lifelong support
Cheaper to do it the Welfare Way and you get an “Obama Phone!” as a bonus.
TT
Does anyone need any more proof that homosexuality/lesbianism is mental illness?
As for marriage, I have news for them-—they don’t HAVE it. Two women violating each other with plastic toys is not “marriage.” Two men messing with each other’s filthy anal area is not “marriage.” Both are simply perversion and sickness of the lowest kind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.