Posted on 09/28/2012 10:29:56 AM PDT by Evil Slayer
It remains unclear whether President Barack Obama's lies about attacks on U.S. embassies will cost him re-election. One thing is certain, however: whatever ambitions Secretary of State Hillary Clinton once held to run for president in 2016 have been damaged beyond repair. Obama was literally asleep when the proverbial "3 a.m. call" came, but Clinton--who bears responsibility for embassy security--was asleep on the job for weeks.
Clinton's response--"How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?--bears the same naïveté for which she once mocked her Democratic rival in debates and campaign commercials. Both Obama and Clinton suffer the same self-delusion: that the world loves Democrats and hates Republicans, that it loves flower children and hates cowboys. Benghazi is a wake-up call they should not have needed--not after the first 9/11, not after Bill Clinton's "law enforcement" approach to terror failed.
In that sense, Hillary Clinton has failed her first test as a potential commander-in-chief--just as Obama has failed before. The success of the Osama bin Laden raid will be the enduring legacy of his administration--but the Ft. Hood shootings, the underwear bomber (and its associated intelligence failures), and now the 9/11/12 attacks are symptoms of an administration ideologically consumed with avoiding the reality of radical Islam.
Hillary Clinton has not only carried out the worst of Obama's foreign and national security policies--she has done so enthusiastically, shouting at Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for 45 minutes in 2010, for instance. Clinton's deputy, UN Ambassador Susan Rice, has set new lows in both dishonesty and absenteeism.
Voters care about national security and foreign policy--increasingly so, even though the economy predominates. If she follows through on what many anticipate (despite denials) are her 2016 ambitions, Hillary Clinton will have a tough time convincing
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
But, the short hair on a woman brings the face features UP.
Long hair tends to drag the face down, and exaggerate them.
This is illusion, but it is very effective. Kind of an instant facelift.
but hey, if you like long hair on a lady, it's ok.
“This article assumes that most of the dopes in this country would even care about our foriegn policy, much less remember the killing of an Ambassador. In 4 years!?”
Exactly. This article is absurd. The sheep do what the media tells them. Almost no one but us knows about half this stuff.
Geez....you gals astound me with insights like that. And I'm an artist. You think I would have noticed something so simple by now!
Still, I've known a few older women who looked great with long hair. Just thinking about them, I do recall that all of them had slim faces too. I'm seeing your point.
Since Hillary Clinton knows she has no more skin in this game and has nothing to lose at this time and her chances of becoming president is lost for good she is a lose cannon and could spill the beans on everyone in Obama’s administration.
There are exceptions to all this, of course, but I just don't think anything would make a Democrat woman like Hillary look good.
Other exceptions would be Stars, they have access to so much and much can be airbrushed out.
Most older women, in my opinion, should never have hair longer than chin length.
One other pet peeve of mine is, sleeveless on older flabby armed women. I just don't need to see that flapping in the wind. Wear sleeves no higher than the elbow, out in public.
PS:I'm an old woman, so I can talk. These are my rules for myself.
Your an artist, you can brush things out, or put them in, lol.
Sorry to those who disagree, but elderly women who wear their hair long look RIDICULOUS.
***
I wholeheartedly agree. My sisters and I, all women over 60, talk about this frequently.
However, in Hitlery’s case, I think she has a practical purpose. I am guessing that she knows it looks awful, but she is planning on getting a facelift and will have it cut then. Everyone will be talking about how much better she looks and will attribute the change to the hair.
She really does have beautiful hair when it is properly cut and styled. When she was running against Obummer, she always looked fabulous, so I guess she had some top advisers for style. Too bad nobody could give her a soul transplant.
the Clintons-...the “Bonnie and Clyde” of state and national politics in the USA for the last 35 years...have DIRECTLY led to 09/11/01 and 09/11/12. Period.
We the People need to hook the two of them..and the national traitorous Democrat Party off the national stage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.