The result, was called "George".
This guy is a true romantic.
I suppose the sperm comes from .... goats?
I know this professor well enough to ignore this article. Everyone in his lab is giggling about this piece. Don’t take it seriously. He just likes being ‘thought-provoking’ and a little crazy. I’m sure he’s giggling at the reactions he’s gotten too.
Yeah, those degrees in Mesopotamian culture and LGBT studies are very lucrative.
It takes two to tango there Greg, no matter how much you try to deny it. Asexual reproduction is not in the cards for mammals, no matter how much you want it to be so.
Just because the NYT gets along without any...
What can you do with a society this profoundly stupid? Blow the whole damn thing up and start over, is about all.
He's entitled to his own opinion, not his own facts.
When humanity drank Hugh Hefner’s kool-aid, we all sank to a lower level of evolution (so to speak), in that we rejected God and all the civilizing aspects of the Ten Commandments, the New Testament, and the inherent value of all people.
Western civilization arose from a Judeo-Christian perspective. When we reject it, our marriages are devalued, pregnancy becomes a nuisance and a disease, children are nothing by bothersome, etc., and babies can be killed for any reason whatsoever. All logic goes out the door (and out of our minds). Women succomb to all sorts of dumb premises like a “War against Women” when actually respect for women has tanked because of the same liberal policies that are decrying said phony war.
Just my two cents worth.
Who needs men when we have a penis-wielding Sandra Fluke? I doubt she’d do very well against a Chinese soldier, however.
What can you do with a society this profoundly stupid? Blow the whole damn thing up and start over, is about all.
(dang, HTML tag fail on the previous post, sorry).
Liberals believe most Americans are like farm animals. They believe Americans are simple beasts of burden meant to work their entire lives and have what they earn taken from them by a tiny elite using the force of government.
In this scenario men are unnecessary except for their labor and increasingly that is unnecessary. Women are more compliant and submissive. They are more easily controlled.
The only thing protecting Americans from a life of unimaginable misery and suffering is their willingness to fight for their faith and their families. The elites are already destroying religion and spirituality. If they can destroy the family they will have accomplished their goal.
I would hate a world without real men. Love my husband, love little boys. The world has gone mad!
Yes, and just look at the problems this has caused in our society.
Hah. Without men to defend them, they would be getting raped by other men. Move to Islamic countries, and see how that works.
The result, was called "George".
There is, actually, quite a bit more to human survival than this if one insists on including culture, which is, at its core, simply another ploy in the natural selection game. Here the value of the male is what he brings to the game in his normal areas of specialization of defense, construction, and beer-drinking. It is not to say that females cannot fill that function; it is to say that incorporating specialists tends to stretch the corpus of cultural survival ploys. Moreover, can we say that a culture in which nobody lights farts with a Zippo or a .45 is a culture worth living in? I thought not.
LOL, what an absurd article this is coinsidering it is men who are responsible entirely for everything we see going on in the world today.......oh wait....
The New York Times, Who Needs Them?
women need men as men need women, it really is that simple for even for some of the women NAIZ’s and homostapo.
Hopefully the wmen NAZIS and the homostapo stay as they are becuase they can;t reproduce but sadly they do go shopping for a child and the play families, bless em.
ARF