Skip to comments.
Male Couples Face Pressure To Fill Cradles
New York Times ^
| August 9, 2012
| RACHEL L. SWARNS
Posted on 08/09/2012 6:58:41 PM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
61
posted on
08/09/2012 9:28:58 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
To: reaganaut1
62
posted on
08/09/2012 10:29:26 PM PDT
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: DBrow
Generally they are ‘custom ordered’ so to speak and are not ‘off the rack’.
The real question is are they going to induce a woman with money to carry and then turn over her child to a couple of deviants?
Also the proper answer is, NO we can't have children as sodomy doesn't result in offspring.
63
posted on
08/09/2012 10:57:23 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: reaganaut1
Asking two men if they are going to have kids is a sure sign you really are quite a stupid, stupid person.
64
posted on
08/09/2012 11:09:38 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: reaganaut1
Inseminating feces is how politicians are made.
65
posted on
08/09/2012 11:46:40 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
To: reaganaut1
...now that parenting among same-sex couples is becoming more common.More propaganda by the MSM. There aren't that many same-sex couples to begin with, and with the very small number of those who want to adopt a child, I wouldn't call that 'becoming more common'.
66
posted on
08/10/2012 12:07:23 AM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: rcrngroup
Yep and 1 Cor 6:9 is also pretty specific too.
“Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders”
See my tagline.
67
posted on
08/10/2012 2:28:12 AM PDT
by
bjorn14
(Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
To: reaganaut1
This post needs a mega-barf alert and a PG-13 rating so the young don’t read about these disgusting sodomites
68
posted on
08/10/2012 2:31:39 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
To: Gene Eric
I guess a lot of straight assholes are interested in this outrageous, destructive experiment.Must be because the polls have a high enough percentage approving of gay marriage. The young are more liberal on this than the older set who grew up knowing right and wrong and went to church even if they didn't listen (it penetrated)
69
posted on
08/10/2012 2:38:55 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
To: SuziQ
Add to that, that it takes ~20 years to bring up a child, and gay couples don’t normally stay together that long.
70
posted on
08/10/2012 3:31:34 AM PDT
by
thulldud
(Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
To: reaganaut1
Many gay men had resigned themselves to the idea that they would never be accepted by society as loving parents and assumed they would never have children. That's a thouht worth holding on to.
71
posted on
08/10/2012 3:38:47 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: reaganaut1
Sick puppies. Submit to your perversions, and you’ll never be normal.
To: reaganaut1
Male Couples Face Pressure To Fill Cradles
Well, I guess they had just been a little too busy filling other things.
73
posted on
08/10/2012 4:32:20 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: redpoll
I'm sorry to hear it, redpoll. I hadn't thought about it that way. The world is upside down.
74
posted on
08/10/2012 4:34:06 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
To: reaganaut1
Its another way that I feel like what we have is valid in the eyes of other people,You only FEEL it, dude. God set it up so it doesn't work that way.
75
posted on
08/10/2012 5:07:48 AM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
To: reaganaut1
What are they going to fill the cradle with? Bloody feces?
76
posted on
08/10/2012 5:58:44 AM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: reaganaut1
Here's their kid:
77
posted on
08/10/2012 6:02:07 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: reaganaut1
If you put your child up for sadoption can you specify that they do not get adopted by a couple of perverts?
78
posted on
08/10/2012 6:03:47 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: reaganaut1
If you put your child up for adoption can you specify that they do not get adopted by a couple of perverts?
79
posted on
08/10/2012 6:03:54 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: reaganaut1
"...their guests began asking: Are you going to
have acquire kids? When are you going to
have purchase kids?"
Minimal sanity requires major editing in this piece.
80
posted on
08/10/2012 6:04:16 AM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson