Posted on 06/23/2012 6:04:27 PM PDT by Kaslin
This story dropped Friday night, via National Review’s Robert Costa.
I’m reliably informed that Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the Budget Committee chairman, has submitted paperwork to the Romney campaign. Sources confirm that he is being vetted for the vice-presidential nomination.
Ryan, one of the GOP’s brightest young stars, is clearly a favorite of Romney allies. But some top Republican officials are wary of plucking him from the House, where he is the party’s most influential voice on fiscal issues.
Earlier this week, Romney campaigned with Ryan in Janesville, Wis., Ryan’s hometown. Ryan previously stumped for Romney in late March and early April, ahead of Wisconsin’s Republican presidential primary.
For their part, Ryan and his team remain mum on the issue, telling NRO: “Respecting their campaign’s internal process, we’re not going to comment.”
I for one genuinely like Paul Ryan. He strikes me as one of the few politicians inside the Beltway who isn’t afraid to either (a) tackle the tough issues facing our country or (b) lose his prestigious seat in Congress for doing so. (By the way, these are two qualities the president obviously lacks). Indeed, Rep. Ryan has been one of the most vociferous advocates for putting our fiscal house in order. He even introduced a budget proposal last March -- The Path to Prosperity -- which cut long-term spending to sustainable levels, reformed Medicare, and balanced the federal budget. Not too shabby. Setting aside the fact the president’s plan (which was voted down unanimously) accomplished none of these abiding goals, the proposal was -- surprise! -- demagogued relentlessly by Democrats and died in the United States Senate after narrowly passing the House. I suspect it’s scattered across Harry Reid’s desk right about now (underneath all those Republican jobs plans).
At any rate, given Paul Ryan’s many accomplishments, this does not necessarily mean he is without shortcomings. To my knowledge, he’s essentially spent his professional life in government and has no foreign policy credentials or executive experience. This may, indeed, hurt his chances of becoming Mitt Romney’s running mate. Tina Korbe, on the other hand, points out that placing Rep. Ryan on the ticket would demonstrate that Republicans -- finally -- were serious about resolving the nation’s impending debt crisis. And, of course, it would further underscore The One’s ineptitude and failure of leadership over the last three and half years. I like it!
Exit question: What do you guys think about a Romney/Ryan ticket? Feel free to duke it out in the comments section…
We’re number two! We’re number two!
Again!
Ryan’s a great pick, in my opinion, because IF Romney selects him and IF they win and IF Romney is reelected and IF Romney has a successful second term and IF Ryan goes from VP to nominee and IF Ryan follows Romney into the White House, I believe Ryan could be one of our greatest president’s ever. (But that’s a lot of IFs.)
Not interested as Mitt “Lying, Progressive Liberal” Romney is still at the top of the ticket.
Mitt, by comparison, makes McCain look absolutely arch-conservative, and with the addition of Governor Palin that was palatable.
Mitt though, having implemented Gay Marriage, Socialized Medicine, Assault Weapons Ban, Almost implemented a Carbon Cap-and-Trade scam, wholeheartedly supported Abortion, raised taxes/fees on everything he could, etc., etc., etc., is just simply to left-wing for me to vote for.
A VP pick changes nothing where he is concerned.
In my humble opinion a win-win is Christy from NJ. You can't call that SMALL ball.
Big deal; like the VP will sway Mitten’s opinions about anything. It’s just an election ploy to make us think he a “conservative” now.
You’ll go nuts when Romney wins.
Obama was a low-level editor in Reference Services, working on reports describing economic conditions in various foreign countries. By all accounts, he disliked the work, not just because it was pedestrian and boring, but because it was in business. "He calls it working for the enemy," Obama's mother, Ann, wrote after a phone conversation with her son, "because some of the reports are written for commercial firms that want to invest in [Third World] countries." Writing to a former girlfriend, Maraniss says, Obama also "expressed a distaste for the corporate world." And in his engaging but unreliable memoir "Dreams from My Father," Obama described his time at Business International this way: "Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office." . . .
I’m beginning to think Romney may be a fall guy like McCain was . If he picks somebody like Ryan or Christie for VP you can be sure he is .
Ryan is a good man who should stay where he is.
Christie is as much a RINO as Romney, IMO.
West as VP would make it a landslide, I think.
Big deal; like the VP will sway Mitten’s opinions about anything. It’s just an election ploy to make us think he a “conservative” now.
True, but if we get a decent VP, I’ll be praying that he gets a promotion.
Cheney swayed RINO Bush in some areas.
Did the people of the United States really elect Obama man as President?
He’s such an anethema to the American belief system and I include the ‘liberal belief’ sytem in that description. I rarely agreed with President Clinton (and the Lewinski thing was just a complete embarrassment) but, on some level I understood Clinton’s connection to the voters. President Obama, on the other hand, doesn’t even strike me as someone who’s comfortable with the belief system of 80% of the country. Most of us believe in free market capitalism and feel success should be financially rewarded. Obama seems to think the system owes everyone something.
To take this even further it seems as if Obama is trying to divide the country not between left and right political philosophies (which is always a healthy divide I think) but, between white people and non-white people. This would be dissastrous as our political battles would then turn from ‘how’ to best run the country into simply ‘who’ should run the country...regardless of philosophy....kind of like the so called democracy the Sunni’s and Shiites have put togeher in Iraq.
Romney is not always the most comfortable speech-giver and some of his ideas are flawed and probably political but, at least I feel like he (and Ryan) has the best interest of America at his core. Obama just seems to have a big angry chip on his shoulder.
When Mitt starts vetting Sarah Palin for Veep, let me know. Ditto, Jim DeMint.
I could hardly contain my rage reading that quote from Byron York. To Obama the owner of a corner grocery store is an “enemy”. This is Communism circa 1917, or 1950 at the latest! Only in America among such academic wannabe revolutionaries. And Americans voted for this Mugabe? In 1917 and in 1945 it took violent revolutions (and FDR) to install such people in foreign governments. And we fool ourselves that we have a near perfect democratic republic. Where are our leaders, our media to educate the voters?! I’m seeing Germany in the 1930s, Argentina in the 1940s.
Romney/Christy is way too RINO, and it’s way too “northeastern states only”! The majority of conservative voters/very conservative voters will be very disappointed, with such a ticket. Christy is for amnesty for illegal immigrants, too!
Romney cares about the best interests of Romney.
He’s a big-government nanny-stater known as the father of both gay marriage and Obamacare (in its Romneycare version) in MA.
Like Obama, he’s ambitious, sees himself as something godlike, and has been running for president for at least six years now.
The only difference is that thanks to his personal fortune, Romney’s had the leisure to do this. Obama had to get Saudis and Marxists to fund him.
So I guess maybe this is an improvement, but not much.
The problem with picking somebody from the House is that you don’t know if they can even carry their state since they only represent a district and most have never run for statewide office. I like Ryan and he may be the best choice but I’m just not sold.
Smoke and Mirrors, Rand Paul will be the VP. To many things in factor here, as well, he has dropped the Libertarians off the cliff. Ron has 1/3 of the delegates, by hook or crook, it matters not. The deal has been made, his son will be VP or they will shut down the Florida convention. Sorry to the republicans but, the tea party is not dead, just underground talking to allot of people. As Van Jones said, we didn’t count on the Tea Party.
No I’m not a Ron Paul fan or associate, but Rand changed his voice to republican in a week, and Mit wants that vote (tea party).
Romney cares about the best interests of Romney. He’s a big-government nanny-stater known as the father of both gay marriage and Obamacare (in its Romneycare version) in MA. Like Obama, he’s ambitious, sees himself as something godlike, and has been running for president for at least six years now. The only difference is that thanks to his personal fortune, Romney’s had the leisure to do this. Obama had to get Saudis and Marxists to fund him. So I guess maybe this is an improvement, but not much.
Well, you may be right about Romney but, we have to give the dudee a chance. What’s the choice? Say what you want but, Romney knows how to run a business.
Second, Romney-care is not unconstitutional and to compare it to Obama care on a legal basis does everyone a diservice. Hers’ the thing: Any and all states have the right to make people buy insurance...which I wouldn’t support but, as an elected state government, they can do what they want.
Obama-care, on the other hand, is not constitutional. Follow me- The Obama administration is claiming the right to make individuals in every state buy insurance based on the Commerce Clause of the constitution. The Commerce Clause does give the power to the Feds to regulate the economy. It does not, however; give the Feds the power make us take part in the economy. In other words, the feds have no more right to make us buy health insurance than the state of Oregon has the right to make Californians buy health insurance. With that said, Massachusettes has every right to make their own citezens buy insurance. Got it?! Good. Now, go educate some of your friends.
Perhaps, I misunderstand. But are you saying that wacky Ron Paul represents the Tea Party?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.