Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mustangman

Romney cares about the best interests of Romney.

He’s a big-government nanny-stater known as the father of both gay marriage and Obamacare (in its Romneycare version) in MA.

Like Obama, he’s ambitious, sees himself as something godlike, and has been running for president for at least six years now.

The only difference is that thanks to his personal fortune, Romney’s had the leisure to do this. Obama had to get Saudis and Marxists to fund him.

So I guess maybe this is an improvement, but not much.


36 posted on 06/23/2012 7:53:59 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: livius

Romney cares about the best interests of Romney. He’s a big-government nanny-stater known as the father of both gay marriage and Obamacare (in its Romneycare version) in MA. Like Obama, he’s ambitious, sees himself as something godlike, and has been running for president for at least six years now. The only difference is that thanks to his personal fortune, Romney’s had the leisure to do this. Obama had to get Saudis and Marxists to fund him. So I guess maybe this is an improvement, but not much.

Well, you may be right about Romney but, we have to give the dudee a chance. What’s the choice? Say what you want but, Romney knows how to run a business.

Second, Romney-care is not unconstitutional and to compare it to Obama care on a legal basis does everyone a diservice. Hers’ the thing: Any and all states have the right to make people buy insurance...which I wouldn’t support but, as an elected state government, they can do what they want.

Obama-care, on the other hand, is not constitutional. Follow me- The Obama administration is claiming the right to make individuals in every state buy insurance based on the Commerce Clause of the constitution. The Commerce Clause does give the power to the Feds to regulate the economy. It does not, however; give the Feds the power make us take part in the economy. In other words, the feds have no more right to make us buy health insurance than the state of Oregon has the right to make Californians buy health insurance. With that said, Massachusettes has every right to make their own citezens buy insurance. Got it?! Good. Now, go educate some of your friends.


39 posted on 06/23/2012 8:22:11 PM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson