Science, arrogantly believing they can improve on the divine design. God help us all!
Are we in such short supply of human beings that this is necessary?
Good and bad news there. Good news: No more menopausal women; Bad news: Social Security is already going broke.
Seriously though, why do this? This is man at his arrogant worst.
Oh no ... we will have to put up with Cher’s and Goldie Hawn’s aging but surgically corrected bodies FOREVER.
Gee, what could possibly go wrong? /s - or is it s/?
So we kill the embryos we don’t want, and manufacture those we do? I think it was the 60’s when we had that saying... “Stop the world, I want to get off!”
This is done in the service of Sandra Fluke and her ilk, who wish to postpone pregnancy until they have well-established careers; and who wish to fulfill the claim that "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle."
Like most liberals, they fail to include the element of time in their calculations, and of what humans really are like: first, who wants to have a mom who is 70-ish when they are in their mid-teens, and second, I can see great problems with alienation from society and consequent resentment on the part of the children when they learn that they were conceived unnaturally and that (likely enough) they have no possibility of finding who their "mother" and "father" are.
Reductionism is dehumanizing to those who are the subject of analysis and experiment; and leads to a Luciferian pride on the part of the experimenters. I supposed that the experimenters here flatter themselves that these techniques disprove the existence of the soul.
Cheers!
NO cheers, unfortunately.
one can only wonder........has fertilization not taken place already?
I can’t see a zealous grad student being bound by law.
...While millions are murdered in the womb.
Lawyers and Dictators everywhere are breathless on this one.
Outrageous and sad! Can S & G be far behind?
Fascist Pigs breeding indoctrinated jackbooted mongrel enforcers while the hard working dumass horse pays for everything.
“an infinite supply of human eggs which could allow older and infertile women to become mothers”
Axlotl tanks, anyone?
So, once again, the “progressives” have turned right and wrong upside down.
It isn’t that a woman’s reproductive system exists to bear and nurture children.
No.
It exists to keep the woman young, healthy, and desireable.
So the “goal” isn’t really to treat any disorder - just a vain attempt to fight time.
And once again, they won’t pay attention to the victims...the innocent children who have become a commodity.
And all this has been accomplished without any mutations, hybrids, and killings.
This is evil science in my opinion.
So goes the tenure of men. After setting the stage for this by defaming men over the years in TV ads and general conversation we have arrived at the point of farming men for their sperm and the the feminists can run the world as they see fit.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Horribly wrong and evil in about 10 ways I can think of off hand without even trying. Evil with a huge bright red blinking capital "E".