Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Shaken Baby Syndrome" used in defense of Trayvon Martin's killer
Reuters ^ | 04/06/2012 | Reuters

Posted on 04/06/2012 12:45:11 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd

SANFORD, Fla., April 6 (Reuters) - "Shaken Baby Syndrome" was cited on Friday in the defense of George Zimmerman, the Sanford, Florida, man who shot and killed unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin, in a case that has sparked a widespread public outcry.

Hal Uhrig, a lawyer and former Gainesville, Florida, police officer who recently joined Zimmerman's defense team, cited in a TV interview the brain damage that can seriously injure or kill an infant.

His point, which has been made before, was that Zimmerman contends he shot Martin in self defense and feared for his life after the 17-year-old attacked him and began pounding his head into the concrete pavement of a gated community on a rainy evening in Sanford on Feb. 26.

But Uhrig's choice of words, and use of a recognized sign of child abuse to defend a 28-year-old man who killed a kid, seemed likely to raise more than just a few eyebrows.

"We're familiar with the Shaken Baby Syndrome," said Uhrig on the CBS This Morning program. "You shake a baby, the brain shakes around inside the skull. You can die when someone's pounding your head into the ground."

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: blackkk; florida; georgezimmerman; hemireuters; shakenbaby; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
But Uhrig's choice of words, and use of a recognized sign of child abuse to defend a 28-year-old man who killed a kid, seemed likely to raise more than just a few eyebrows.

Baloney. What is raising a few eyebows with me is the barf inducing headline.

Did anyone else read this and think Zimmerman's defense team was attempting to claim George was a victim of SBS and therefore he shot martin? Or is it just me?

1 posted on 04/06/2012 12:45:17 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Nope. I thought that too.

Bit of a misleading title.


2 posted on 04/06/2012 12:48:45 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

the.media.lies.


3 posted on 04/06/2012 12:50:13 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I think in about 5 - no, 4 - years I'll have had enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

His assertion is retarded.


4 posted on 04/06/2012 12:51:10 PM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

.lie.


5 posted on 04/06/2012 12:51:10 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I think in about 5 - no, 4 - years I'll have had enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chris37
"Nope. I thought that too."

Same here.

6 posted on 04/06/2012 12:52:07 PM PDT by DeaconRed (ZERO supporters are stuck on stupid. . . Always were, always will be. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Yes, the article title is misleading, but the lawyer didn’t have to go there either. I think most people know the implications of having your head jackhammered into a sidewalk without having to compare it to SBS.


7 posted on 04/06/2012 12:53:12 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Kind of a stupid statement by the defense. How about saying “Imagine you are pinned on the ground, having your head repeatedly beaten against the sidewalk - you have a choice, stay there and die or defend yourself. My client chose to defend himself with the only means he had available”.


8 posted on 04/06/2012 12:55:29 PM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
Yes, the article title is misleading, but the lawyer didn’t have to go there either.
 
But how do we know that someone (the media for instance) didn't bring up SBS first, and the atorney was just replying in general?
 
What with NBC editing comments to make Z look racist, I don't trust ANYTHING the media reports here.
 
They have an agenda. IF (big If) the lawyer mentioned this at all, it is clear the media will put a nasty spin on it.


9 posted on 04/06/2012 12:58:49 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goseminoles

>”His assertion is retarded.”<

And so most likely will be his audieance.


10 posted on 04/06/2012 1:00:18 PM PDT by EggsAckley ( There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply ! ! ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Responsibility2nd.

Trayvon was responsible.


11 posted on 04/06/2012 1:00:58 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Did anyone else read this and think Zimmerman's defense team was attempting to claim George was a victim of SBS and therefore he shot martin? Or is it just me?

I think that that is exactly what the headline writer wanted the reader to think.

Trust the MSM to try to trivialize having your head pounded against concrete.

12 posted on 04/06/2012 1:01:52 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Reuters.


13 posted on 04/06/2012 1:02:25 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The Democrat Ku Klux Klan is alive and well as the New Black Panthers, CBC and the NAACP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Come on, it’s Reuters. “...seemed likely to raise a few eyebrows...”

No person with room temp IQ or above believes these slugs anymore.


14 posted on 04/06/2012 1:02:25 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

“Kind of a stupid statement by the defense...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

See post 9.

I would have to see a video of the CBS This Morning program and view the conversation in full context before I come down against the attorney.

Maybe he did say something stupd. But we know for sure the media will lie and manipulate (the article headline for instance) anything they can to distort the truth.


15 posted on 04/06/2012 1:04:06 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
As usual the headline is misleading and the point made was completely reasonable.

He was offering an example people would understand to explain the way fatal brain injuries happen.

Anyone who thinks this should raise eyebrows is allowing himself to be led around by the nose by these media idiots.

16 posted on 04/06/2012 1:07:51 PM PDT by gopcharger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Good point.


17 posted on 04/06/2012 1:08:39 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

If so, they’ve come up quite a bit in my estimation, VVV!


18 posted on 04/06/2012 1:12:13 PM PDT by MarineDad (Wherever mosques and JDAM's meet, civilization benefits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; Hodar; randog; All
I'm cubically challenged.
 
I'm guessing the video is here.
 

Zimmerman Lawyer Invokes Shaken Baby Syndrome 

 
Can someone watch and see if the attorney stepped in it? Or is the media over dramatizing things?
 


19 posted on 04/06/2012 1:13:03 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I'm sure the misleading title was a complete oversight.

/sarc

20 posted on 04/06/2012 1:13:03 PM PDT by mykroar (Please be aware any /sarc tag is for the lurkers, not the Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson