Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Combative Obama warns Supreme Court on health law
Yahoo News ^ | 4/2/2012 | Stephen Collinson

Posted on 04/02/2012 6:38:31 PM PDT by pterional

US President Barack Obama on Monday challenged the "unelected" Supreme Court not to take the "extraordinary" and "unprecedented" step of overturning his landmark health reform law.

(Excerpt) Read more at ca.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: bullyinchief; dictatorinchief; healthcare; kagan; narcissistinchief; obamacare; obamapoleon; obameltdown; scotus; separationofpowers; supremecourt; tyrantinchief; waronscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Junior_G

LOL, Drudge is an evil genius with some of his pictures.


61 posted on 04/02/2012 9:19:46 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kevslisababy

Doesn’t the Pretender-in-Chief understand that he has no standing or authority over the Supreme Court?


62 posted on 04/02/2012 9:33:24 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain ... USS Iowa BB 61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: research99

FDR packed the court in the 30’s after failing in his try to expand the number of justices.

FDR tried to by appointing 3 more judges to the court, but even the Speaker of the House(DEM) was appalled. I had to laugh when Bush 43 was accused by the Democraps of “packing the court” ,when he was only exercising his right to fill a vacancy.


63 posted on 04/02/2012 9:48:49 PM PDT by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pterional

Since when does a president lobby the SCOTIS. They are independent branches. I hope they send his letter back saying that they will not consider it.

Grrr.


64 posted on 04/02/2012 10:07:37 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13

Sorry and thanks for the correction. It is Breyer I am thinking of. There’s probably not much chance he will join Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy. I don’t see any of the women voting to uphold the Constitution.


65 posted on 04/03/2012 6:23:58 AM PDT by citizen (Santorum: Man up, stop being selfish and get the hell out. Dragging this thing out only helps Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

“Worried” implies he doesn’t know the outcome, that Elena didn’t tell him the results of the initial vote.

I’m guessing it’s 6-3 against him, and he’s mad and trying to intimidate them before the release of the verdict in June.


66 posted on 04/03/2012 6:26:35 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson