Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special Report: Intel shows Iran nuclear threat not imminent
Reuters ^ | Friday, March 23, 2012 | Tabassum Zakaria and Mark Hosenball

Posted on 03/24/2012 8:40:02 AM PDT by SunkenCiv

The United States, European allies and even Israel generally agree on three things about Iran's nuclear program: Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead.

Those conclusions, drawn from extensive interviews with current and former U.S. and European officials with access to intelligence on Iran, contrast starkly with the heated debate surrounding a possible Israeli strike on Tehran's nuclear facilities.

"They're keeping the soup warm but they are not cooking it," a U.S. administration official said.

Reuters has learned that in late 2006 or early 2007, U.S. intelligence intercepted telephone and email communications in which Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, a leading figure in Iran's nuclear program, and other scientists complained that the weaponization program had been stopped.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: europeanunion; iran; israel; nato; whatmeworry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: SunkenCiv

On September 1, 1939, All was peaceful and calm on the Polish border./s


21 posted on 03/24/2012 11:10:55 AM PDT by TsonicTsunami08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

exactly,

the United States starting without 70 years of working data, blueprints, computers, advanced technology, with nothing but a theory, it took us only 4 years to arrive with weapons of mass destruction delivered to target,


22 posted on 03/24/2012 11:36:24 AM PDT by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Special Report: Intel shows Iran nuclear threat not imminent - Reuters

About as credible as Baghdad Bob.

23 posted on 03/24/2012 11:45:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (In self-evident truth, in timeless principle, in the people themselves, lie our republic's only hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

RE: Special Report: Intel shows Iran nuclear threat not imminent.

Oh good, we can all stop worrying now. NOT!!


24 posted on 03/24/2012 12:55:02 PM PDT by jesseam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

If the mullahs want a gun type bomb, they can build it right now; maybe even several.

They will be heavy, but could be delivered by sea, e.g., in a cargo container, sub, or commercial aircraft.

If a container with a nuke goes off in NY harbor, who do we blame?


25 posted on 03/24/2012 2:50:38 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; doug from upland; Nachum; Cindy; G8 Diplomat; AdmSmith; Dog; nuconvert; ...

Great post.

Iran had 10 kilos of 5% in February, 2010 that grew to 30 kilos of 20% by October 2010, using their only cascade capable of doing so. They have an estimated 105 kilos of 20% now.

Given the same production efficiency, Iran adds about 5 kilos of 20% a month, 60 kilos of 20% a year.

But what does it take to get to 90% enrichment of U-235, enough for a bomb? That is where the concept of “effective kilograms” comes in.

Because of Iran’s relatively crude and inefficient processing program is not very effective. The “effective kilograms” is the weight multiplied by the square of its enrichment.

Iran’s current 105 kilos of 20% can, under the best conditions, produce only 4.2 kilos of 90%. A gun-type bomb needs about 58 kilos of 90%.

Iran adds about 2.4 kilos a year and it would take them over 22 years to get enough for a crude weapon.

Their cascades can’t do any better, any faster. Iran knows it and that is one reason why they want a Heavy Water Reactor. Iran has been effectively blocked from buying the technology to be more efficient.

Implosion type bombs need far less fuel. However the high-speed explosive design is very complex. That’s why IAEA inspectors are so interested in the explosives testing at Parchin. They may be working on an implosion-type bomb.


26 posted on 03/25/2012 11:17:30 AM PDT by gandalftb (The art of diplomacy says "nice doggie", until you find a bigger rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; gandalftb

A Look at Iran
http://www.truthusa.com/IRAN.html

#

Thank you SunkenCiv for posting this thread and thank you Grandalftb for the ping.


27 posted on 03/25/2012 4:05:50 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Thanks, I just add two links

http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/5028/significantly-wrong-about-significant-quantities

and 120 pages about Verification of Dismantlement and verifying http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/dismantle.pdf


28 posted on 04/02/2012 11:51:22 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

Good links!


29 posted on 04/02/2012 4:25:32 PM PDT by gandalftb (The art of diplomacy says "nice doggie", until you find a bigger rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson