BAM! That’s going to leave a mark.
Amen I say
Here’s the bottom line: Liberals just make stuff up and have absolutely no concern for truth. They make things up and then just walk away, moving on to their next lie. They simply don’t care about truth because they have long since figured out that truth will never substantiate them.
The correct translation for "holocaust" is: "an accepted burned offering." Now think back to what they did with many Jewish bodies after gassing them in the camps.
Creepy, huh?
"The holocaust" was a cynical invention of an anti-Semitic media. The correct word is "Shoah," which simply means "disaster."
I'm NOT a Holocaust denier. However, I am willing to recognize that some people may employ the word in a very cynical, self-serving fashion as a political weapon. These people should be ashamed.
Now, I think I understand your position. You dont think the unborn are people. Well, what are they? Are you even prepared to offer an explanation of when a living fetus becomes a person?
The crux of the false analogy is that Mr. Friedman's distinction is not about "personhood;" it is about collective intent for genocide, which is a different crime than murder for convenience. The goal of abortion is not to kill all babies of only a particular race. Mr. Adams should learn better.
Excellent!
I find it worrisome that the far left now argues for post-birth abortion. Newborn babies are almost as small as they were just before birth, and within the first couple weeks they are usually noticeably smaller. The newborn are only slightly more developed than the unborn. Newborns require a protected environment. And newborn babies must depend on others for survival. Former US Senator Obama argued for legal killing of the accidentally born children who survive attempted abortions, and that view is moving toward the mainstream in the far left fringe that controls the Democrat Party. The only justice in their stance is that most democrats are at a lower level of mental development, require a protective environment, and must depend on productive Americans for survival. If they get the powerful centralized government they are working to create, liberals will be its first victims.
The people who did the killing in the Holocaust first had to alter their conscience or superego. They had to accept the absurd notion that the Jews, Gypsies and others were not really human beings and exterminating them while unpleasant was not in their mind a moral transgression. These murderers actually had families and slept well. Similarly those who do the abortions and acquiesce to abortion have made a similar accommodation. They have convinced themselves that killing pre born human life is somehow not a transgression against nature. They profit and live well, and fully expect their neighbors to applaud their killing. They do have a lot in common with the Nazi killers. Personally I never trust a “pro abortion” individual. When someone announces they are “pro choice” (the politically correct term for the killing), they have shown they are capable of virtually any moral transgression. it is best to have only superficial relationships with such people.
Google the demographics of abortion.
Now, consider that abortion may be ‘chlorine for the gene pool’. Wouldn’t want to stand in the way of evolution, would you?
Just sayin’.
A+
Stalin, Hitler, Sanger, Mao, Pol Pot. She’s right up there with the worst.
53+million babies, in America, alone! That is so mind-boggling, but our country wants to kill the person who brings the message about it, not the industry doing the killing.
Watch the movie, if you haven’t! I sent it to every friend via email.
Adams should have called feti “untermenschen”, subhumans, to get the point across to Friedman. Noting that Sanger was decorated by Hitler would have also been useful.
Just DAMN! Awesomely said!!!