Skip to comments.
Romney leads Alaska presidential preference poll (Wins by 420 votes)
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner ^
| March 7, 2012
Posted on 03/07/2012 8:58:12 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT
FAIRBANKS - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney maintained a strong lead with most of the results counted in the Alaska Republican presidential preference poll held today.
With 4,225 votes, the former Massachusetts Governor took 32.6 percent of the statewide vote. Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum took 29 percent, Texas congressman Ron Paul took about 24 percent and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich took 14 percent.
At 10:30 p.m., 95 percent of the vote had been counted.
Alaska was one of 10 states to participate in the Republican nomination process today and will divvy up 24 of its delegates according to tonights vote.
In Fairbanks, where most Fairbanks North Star Borough election districts voted at the Carlson Center, Paul was the preferred candidate. A wide array of voters including young and older voters cast their vote for the libertarian-leaning candidate.
Many voters registered at the poll, either switching party affiliation or signing up for the first time.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsminer.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: Idaho; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: ak; alaska; alaskacaucus; caucus; idaho; kansas; kenyanbornmuzzie; ks; mitt; mittromney; newt; newtgingrich; ricksantorum; romney; santorum; supertuesday; wy; wyoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Looks like Mitt will win a squeaker, leading Santorum by about 120 votes. NO EXCUSE FOR THIS ONE, my grassroots heroes!
To: campaignPete R-CT
2
posted on
03/07/2012 9:00:06 AM PST
by
Thunder90
(Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
To: campaignPete R-CT
Many voters registered at the poll, either switching party affiliation or signing up for the first time.Money quote. Dems voting in Republican primary.
/johnny
To: JRandomFreeper
of course this wasn’t a primary. Only 4500 total turnout.
4
posted on
03/07/2012 9:13:09 AM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(and I am going to VT and western MA to campaign against MITT.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
Looks like the Murkowski endorsement bore fruit...
5
posted on
03/07/2012 9:14:18 AM PST
by
donozark
(A soldier lives as long as he is remembered...)
To: campaignPete R-CT
In Wyoming, the delegates elected at precinct caucuses last week are meeting at the 23 county caucus/conventions this week. Sketchy reports say MITT won 3 of the 6 that were held last night.
trib.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/
AND IT’S Kansas caucuses this Saturday, 3/10.
6
posted on
03/07/2012 9:18:42 AM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(and I am going to VT and western MA to campaign against MITT.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
Translation: Mormons screw another election.
7
posted on
03/07/2012 9:19:07 AM PST
by
aimhigh
To: campaignPete R-CT
(Wins by 120 votes)
MITTENS JUST CANNOT CLOSE THE SALE! And the GOP says this is the only candidate that can take it to Zero??? Huh?
8
posted on
03/07/2012 9:19:07 AM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: campaignPete R-CT
9
posted on
03/07/2012 9:20:38 AM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(and I am going to VT and western MA to campaign against MITT.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
How come the bad guys manage to squeak out wins in Alaska? Is there something foul going on here or are they just lucky?
10
posted on
03/07/2012 9:22:55 AM PST
by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
To: campaignPete R-CT
Blacks vote for Obama because he's perceived as black; Mormons vote for Mitt because he's Mormon; evangelicals vote for Santorum because he's believed to be Christian...
Are there ANY voters left who vote for a candidate based on the 'issues'???
11
posted on
03/07/2012 9:23:45 AM PST
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Nateman
How come the bad guys manage to squeak out wins in Alaska? Is there something foul going on here or are they just lucky?
Last night as I was watching Santorum ahead in OH for hours and hours and then all of a sudden around 10pm mittens starts to close the gap, all I could think of was Rossi in Washington, and Frankenstein in MN when the proper number of votes were "found" just in the nick of time. I no longer trust any politician no matter what flavor they are.
12
posted on
03/07/2012 9:30:07 AM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Cheerio; onyx; Jim Robinson
MITTENS JUST CANNOT CLOSE THE SALE! And the GOP says this is the only candidate that can take it to Zero???
13
posted on
03/07/2012 9:34:31 AM PST
by
greyfoxx39
(If Jesus returned today the mormon church would try to sell him a condo in their billion-dollar mall)
To: who knows what evil?
No. This is the base intelligence of America. They don’t want to take time or they are scared of the vital national and international issues facing this nation. Would rather vote for their religious affiliation. They don’t understand that they could be turning this world over to a man completely unprepared for a potential world war starting with Iran and Israel and a devastating looming economic crisis that could cripple America. Santorum has no experience in any of this and we can not afford OJT when faced with crisis. Frankly, Romney shows far more leadership than Santorum and Gingrich is levels above Romney. Let them have their confessor.
14
posted on
03/07/2012 9:36:44 AM PST
by
Toespi
To: Cheerio
Or the exit polls that showed Sharon ahead of Reid but it was not even a squeaker in the count. Reid managed to steal a whole bunch this time. Guess he did not want another stolen squeaker like he had 12 years before.
15
posted on
03/07/2012 9:42:11 AM PST
by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
To: Nateman
maybe ideologues are not as interested in tactics and process. The insiders/libs know when a race is razor close and send resources there.
16
posted on
03/07/2012 9:47:43 AM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(and I am going to VT and western MA to campaign against MITT.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
not as interested in tactics and process.Could be, but you have to figure anybody who has taken the time to run is also taking the time to try and win.
17
posted on
03/07/2012 9:51:57 AM PST
by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
To: Nateman
ARE YOU KIDDING!!!???
IF YOU WERE INVOLVED WITH RS OR NG CAMPAIGN YOU WOULD SEE HOW INCOMPETENT THE FOLKS ARE WHO ARE “HIGH UP” in those campaign. I’d call them amateurs, but that would be an insult to amateurs.
They are making the Pat Buchanan campaign look competent.
18
posted on
03/07/2012 9:55:00 AM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(and I am going to VT and western MA to campaign against MITT.)
To: Toespi
Would rather vote for their religious affiliation.
Don’t throw us all in there.
When I have spoken about the dangers of Paul and Romney, and Gingrich’s strengths, it’s like debating with zombies.
I feel like a space alien on the wrong planet.
To: campaignPete R-CT
Sounds like you have inside knowledge. I know when J.D.Hayworth ran against McCain , Hayworths campaign manager just brushed me off when I tried to help. That race was not even close.
20
posted on
03/07/2012 10:03:10 AM PST
by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson