Posted on 02/07/2012 1:43:28 PM PST by EveningStar
The night before the 1986 explosion, Boisjoly and four others argued that joints in the shuttle's boosters couldn't withstand a cold-weather launch.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Please ping me to aviation and aerospace articles. Thank you.
If you want added to or removed from this ping list, please contact me.
RIP, sir.
At least you tried...................
Roger (and Amen) that, Red Badger.
That middle pic was taken when Boeing’s chief test pilot did an aileron roll in one of the original 707 test birds, I believe.
Being a Boeing machine, the maneuver probably didn’t even come close to the plane’s limits.
Neat! However, the good old T-38 could do two rolls/second with full sidestick deflection.
Now, THAT was a kick!
Maaan, I remember that clear as day as if it happened last week. I was working at JFK airport in New York city at the time and there was a blizzard going on, and Fedex (or Federal express as it was known at the time) had crashed one of their planes into a loader-lifter while the plane was being marshalled in. The visibility was zero and the left wing got ripped off. And as that was being investigated, we had the TV on in the office and all you saw was that video of the smoke and the pieces of the shuttle flying off into the sky. And one of my co-workers said: “And Fedex thinks they got problems”. Not a day to be flying.
I disagree. It was one of the great management screw ups of all time.
According to the article, management persisted in ruining the career of Boisjoly and at least one of the other engineers.
I can only imagine what torture he went through watching the Challenger explode.
I know very well what happens when you try to present unpleasant facts to managers, and what happens when they refuse to listen to you and take political expedience over sound engineering judgement.
It my case, it wasn’t a matter of life and death or billions of dollars, but the failure I warned about was just as real, and it came to pass just as I predicted.
Rest in peace, Mr. Boisjoly.
In “Visual Explanations” http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_visex Edward Tufte wrote a must-read analysis of why admonitions to postpone the launch were ignored.
Like the Intel Officer in the British army who tried to tell them the Germans were in force around Arnham but the brits still went on with Operation Market Garden. Monty wanted the headlines and ended up destroying the Britsh Paras.
He ended up having a nervious breakdown....
I'm convinced NASA wanted the Shuttle in orbit it time for the State Of The Union address that afternoon.
Even more now in every agency in every company “managers” decide things they know nothing about. Total arrogance.
I will never forget...they launched below 32 degrees with the school teacher on board so they could be up in space as reagan gave the state of union address that evening.
I know very well what happens when you try to present unpleasant facts to managers, and what happens when they refuse to listen to you and take political expedience over sound engineering judgement.
I just left a company for that very reason. I don’t intend to spend the next few years attempting to salvage a doomed project based on bad assumptions by management. It’s always scary when a lack of knowledge is replaced by the mystical yes man’s assurance of success.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.