Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New "Super Earth" Found at Right Distance for Life
National Geographic ^ | February 2, 2012 | Rachel Kaufman

Posted on 02/03/2012 7:27:00 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

The planet, dubbed GJ 667Cc, orbits a red dwarf star 22 light-years from Earth, in the constellation Scorpio. A binary pair of orange dwarf stars are part of the same system.

(Related: "'Tatooine' Planet With Two Suns Could Host Habitable Moon?")

The new planet has a mass 4.5 times that of Earth and orbits its host star every 28 days.

The red dwarf is relatively dim, so the planet receives slightly less light from its star than Earth does from the sun. But most of the star's light is infrared, so the planet should absorb more of its incoming energy than Earth does from sunlight.

That means if the planet has a rocky surface—which is predicted for planets less than ten times Earth's mass—and an atmosphere, it could support liquid water and maybe life, said co-discoverer Guillem Anglada-Escudé, who conducted the work while at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C.

"If it has an atmosphere, it's probably reddish all the time, because the star is really red," Anglada-Escudé said. "It would be like being evening all the time."

For any hypothetical observers on the surface, the binary stars in the distance would be "very prominent in the sky, and it would be an exotic thing."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: astronomy; gj667cc; science; scorpio; tatooine; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: zeestephen
See red dwarf wiki.
61 posted on 02/04/2012 2:19:59 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
If this is true, it’s the biggest news story of our lifetime.

That's what its inhabitants said when they discovered the mini planet Earth....

62 posted on 02/04/2012 3:26:43 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; Perdogg; BillyBoy; SunkenCiv; ...
If this is true, it’s the biggest news story of our lifetime.

I don't know. I think it would mean much more if someone invented warp drive so we can get there. A planet that's in range is worth the whole rest of the universe in the bush. ;)

63 posted on 02/04/2012 4:32:25 AM PST by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
OR extremely firm!
64 posted on 02/04/2012 5:25:15 AM PST by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
God doesn't exist there? Did you read that in the Bible?
65 posted on 02/04/2012 5:28:44 AM PST by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

How do you know that?

Your premise has no basis what so ever


66 posted on 02/04/2012 5:36:34 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Downinthedixie

“The Drake equation says otherwise.”

The Drake Equation is B.S., It seems simple with everything appearing to be proportional, But indeed they are not. The devil is in the details... It’s not solvable without making stuff up.


67 posted on 02/04/2012 7:00:17 AM PST by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Thanks. I was thinking white dwarfs. Red Dwarfs are the energy efficient lightbulbs of the universe. Not much light but they’ll last a long time.


68 posted on 02/04/2012 8:10:45 AM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: KoRn; Impy; KevinDavis; annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

Thanks KoRn 'n' Impy. I love those binary systems.
 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

69 posted on 02/04/2012 8:17:07 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

I don’t know the whole story. Stars in the sky come in various sizes and colors. The Sun we have is a medium-sized yellow star.


70 posted on 02/04/2012 8:51:32 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

If the star is light on heavy metals, does it manke it more unstable?

Or do we know enough about stars to determine that?


71 posted on 02/04/2012 11:01:16 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Thanks.....

I know - Wiki should have been my first stop.

But digging through a H-R Diagram is such a puzzle for me I was hoping a science chatterbox would lay it all out in a couple of simple sentences.

Learned several cool new things, though, which you may already know.....

Red dwarfs convect helium throughout the star, thus there is no helium ash build up in the core.

The smallest red dwarfs can theoretically burn for more than a trillion years.

Alpha Centauri B is an orange dwarf.

72 posted on 02/04/2012 12:40:55 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Good question. I don’t know.

An all helium star wouldn’t last long; a helium core can’t sustain a star very long because helium burns faster than hydrogen. Once hydrogen is used up at a star’s core, it’s on its last legs.

If a star somehow formed in a super iron-rich cloud, such that the star was largely iron from the get go, that would probably cause some funny behavior.

I don’t know if we know enough about stars to answer your question, but I know that I don’t! :-)


73 posted on 02/04/2012 8:59:19 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

bump

thanks


74 posted on 02/04/2012 9:22:55 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
H-R diagrams are the bomb! When I was a freshman, I was lucky enough to take a conceptual astronomy (no math!) course from a guy who was in love with the H-R diagram. We spent at least three or four weeks on them and I'm glad we did; they're brilliant! Here's a simple one:

Stars are plotted according to their temperature (horizontal axis) and luminosity (vertical axis). Because temperature and color are correlated, you will sometimes see the horizontal axis represented as a color axis instead of a temperature axis. This comes as no surprise. We know from everyday life that color and temperature are correlated; if you heat a coat hanger on a stove top it will first glow red. Then as it gets hotter, orange, yellow, and if you can get it hot enough, blue and white. Same with stars.

Another popular horizontal axis that you'll often see has to do with a star's spectral classification: O,B,A,F,G,K,M (Oh, be a fine girl, kiss me). Type O stars are the hottest, type M the coolest. The Sun is a type G star.

Likewise with the vertical axis. Luminosity and absolute magnitude are directly related. So you'll often see the vertical axis represented as absolute magnitude instead of luminosity.

When you plot all the stars within 25 parsecs of the Sun, a surprising pattern emerges. First, there is the swervy-curvy line that stretches from the upper left to the lower right. It turns out that this is where stable, mid-life stars, called "main sequence" stars, reside.

As stars like the Sun move into old age, they nova, blow off their outer layers and migrate off the main sequence into the upper-right region of the H-R diagram. These are the red giants. What remains of the star, the part that didn't blow off into space, collapses down to a dense hot object called a "white dwarf," or perhaps, if the original star was massive enough, to a neutron star.

There is so much more. I'd encourage you to Google H-R diagrams and to do a Google image search for them as well, and check out all the different forms. You can tell a lot about a star from it's position on an H-R diagram.

Well, I'm about chatterboxed out! And you are as well, I imagine. Ask a chatterbox for a few sentences and you'll get paragraphs! :-)

I did not know there is no helium ash build-up at a red dwarf's core, thanks!

75 posted on 02/04/2012 10:28:30 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
More than 40 years ago my college girlfriend took an astronomy course to fulfill her science requirement.

I can still remember the nightly tears of math desperation.

I pretty much avoided the subject until 2005.

My local education channel carries excellent college level astronomy courses, and the University of Washington chips in with several lecture series each year.

I still cannot believe how little I knew about the universe before then!

And - realized why I'd never heard of red and orange dwarfs...

I think I always saw them called M stars and K stars before.

76 posted on 02/05/2012 1:58:18 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson