Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's with Ann Coulter?
1/26/12 | self

Posted on 01/26/2012 5:00:02 AM PST by Jerrybob

What's with these talking heads, Ann Coulter especially, and their vitriol against Newt? I've always liked Ann, she is SO conservative; now she's pitching for Romney and slamming -- really slamming -- Newt. I don't get it.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: backstabber4romney; backstabberromney; coulter; elections; gingrich; rinocoulter; romney; romneydirtytricks; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last
To: Jerrybob

Marfan’s syndrome ?


101 posted on 01/26/2012 6:18:02 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob
she is SO was conservative
102 posted on 01/26/2012 6:19:04 AM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

Ann supports the GOProud group, and it is known that Drudge is not flying straight.


103 posted on 01/26/2012 6:23:39 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
I wish we could combine the private sector part of Mitt and the feistiness of Newt and the principles of Santorum to build a better candidate.

From your lips to God's ears....

104 posted on 01/26/2012 6:24:25 AM PST by brytlea (An ounce of chocolate is worth a pound of cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I’m not sure where it started. But I don’t think it’s a good idea. We need to vet them, we need to keep an open mind, and we need to be realistic.


105 posted on 01/26/2012 6:27:13 AM PST by brytlea (An ounce of chocolate is worth a pound of cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

Here’s a link to a fr thread that has a link to her rant on O’Reilly

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2837554/posts


106 posted on 01/26/2012 6:30:43 AM PST by stockpirate (Romney, Ann Coulter & our ruling republican SOCIALISTelites, are Big Government socialists,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob
Here's the truth that no one wants to tell about Ann Coulter:

1. She is first, foremost and ALWAYS about Ann Coulter. She's the ultimate self-aggrandizer for whom self-promotion is the only real imperative.

2. Have you read any of her books in a clear-sighted, unprejudiced manner? They are almost unreadable - smarmy, smart-assed and obviously written very quickly. Not high quality writing.

3. She is not a thinker or a reporter. Has she ever written or said anything that hasn't been written or said before, and in a far better manner?

4. Not to be mean, but FReepers have posted photos of her on this forum for years as if she is a beauty. She's not. She's skinny, has a narrow, pinched face and hollow eyes and cheeks. She tries to make up for her lack of good looks with long, dyed blonde hair and her ubiquitous, out-of-place black cocktail dress - the kind of woman I would steer clear of at any gathering.

107 posted on 01/26/2012 6:32:02 AM PST by Dr. Thorne (Fall on your knees before Christ, your only salvation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: ari-freedom

I think the original poster meant something of the Italian sausage variety. :)


109 posted on 01/26/2012 6:45:06 AM PST by Conservative_Jedi (Give me Liberty or give me Death!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

They sense that Newt is going to win in FL and all they can do is turn up the volume (or the frequency of the attack ads).

____________________________________________

Agreed. Just read Drudge and get this, it’s news that the Gingrich campagin made a mistake/or lied in what they told ABC about offering rebuttal witnesses, for the ex-wife interview, in addition to the Gingrich daughters. And this is news..... so sad. We’re 15 trillion in debt, the housing market in in the toliet, unemployment remains high and we’re about to get socked with Obamacare. But the number of Gingrich rebuttal witnesses to an ex-wife’s interview is a hot news topic.

Just goes to show that if you are a Republican Conservative, you’d better walk on water, turn water to wine and raise people from the dead.

I’m going shopping......


110 posted on 01/26/2012 6:46:38 AM PST by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SarahPalin2012

“What’s wrong with her position?”

I’m not an Ann-fan but there is nothing wrong with her position. It’s her choice.

The beat-Obama folks have been silenced by bullies. I don’t know if they can be stirred up again for the big fight if it’s Gingrich. What’s worse is, I don’t think the beat-Romney crowd cares. Most have said they will not vote at all if Romney is the nominee. The presidency has become secondary while the newly discovered crooner-in-chief plays on your local ringtone.

What we should remember about him:

It’s the eye of the tiger
It’s the thrill of the fight
Rising up to the challenge of our rival
And the last known survivor
Stalks his prey in the night
And he’s watching us all
with the eye of the tiger


111 posted on 01/26/2012 6:51:21 AM PST by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CASchack
Yes but what is the basis for those attacks?

As to why Romney is the darling of the GOP establishment - you could justifiably say "Finger in the wind"? Or you could say "pragmatic". They are backing Romney for the very simple reason that they think he has a better chance against Obama than anyone else. I personally think they are wrong, or at the very least that adopting someone like Romney is too high a price for victory, but I'm sure that is their reasoning. You are quite right about Gingrich though. If he wins the nomination, or even looks like he will, then they will all line up behind him as their "great hope". They would line up behind Rick Sartorum or even Ron Paul in the same way. Heck they would line up behind a hypothetical offspring of "Sauron the Great" and "Cruella de ville" called Damian with "666" written on his forehead, if they thought he could win.

112 posted on 01/26/2012 6:57:05 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

“We can disagree with her, but I don’t know why adults cannot discuss and disagree without resorting to personal attacks and speculations about someone’s sexuality.”

It is what it is here . . . anyone who’s been around long enough knows it. It’s not the tone of only this thread, it’s the tone of most threads. . . unless of course as in this particular election cycle, you’re on board with the “anybody but Mitt” brigade. Intimidation and name calling abound in that case.

Thank God these kinds of posters have no real power to influence anything.


113 posted on 01/26/2012 6:57:31 AM PST by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SarahPalin2012
The above replies are ignorant about Ann. I don’t necessarily agree with her reasoning on this, but she is saying let’s go with Mitt because she believes Newt can’t beat Obama. Now let’s say the premise is true. What’s wrong with her position?

If her position is simply that she believes Romney is more electable than Gingrich, that would be one thing. The problem is she is claiming that Romney is the most conservative out of all the candidates, and that is ridiculous. Add to that ludicrous position is the hyperbole and hysteria coming from her and attacking the voters who voted for somebody other than her choice. She is becoming unhinged over this primary and her behavior is really pathetic.

114 posted on 01/26/2012 6:57:43 AM PST by Shelayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I agree with all of Ann’s comments there, except for the one that “Romney is the most conservative.” I dont know anyone on these boards who says that. Does she know something we dont?


115 posted on 01/26/2012 6:59:22 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

Unless the convention drafts someone better than Gingrich or Romney, we are likely going to lose to Obama in November. Another wasted opportunity and likely the end of the America we know and love.


116 posted on 01/26/2012 7:02:35 AM PST by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

Ann is 50. Menopause can do some strange things to a woman’s brain...


117 posted on 01/26/2012 7:08:09 AM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881

Ann Coulter has 0 husbands. That must be by choice.


118 posted on 01/26/2012 7:12:32 AM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

She was simply an opportunist who found a path to a bundle of money by hammering the weasel in chief. She isn’t a conservative in the least. She is, as were, the rats who jumped on the Reagan ship when it sailed. They hide their true colors while it serves their purpose. She is a money grubbing bridge troll who would not have had a continuing career without a knob like Obama to keep her fiery mouth on the front page.


119 posted on 01/26/2012 7:17:42 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob
She does not have enough body fat to properly use the female hormone estrogen. This hormonal imbalance makes an otherwise normal female go crazy. This uncontrolled behavior is called an estrogen avalanche. It can become a VERY dangerous situation for any man within 50 feet of subject female. OK ladies....let me have it! :-)
120 posted on 01/26/2012 7:24:30 AM PST by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson