Okay, now it's clear that you are either a kook, or a troll.
Posted on 01/26/2012 4:35:06 AM PST by icwhatudo
Anne Coulter pal Matt Drudge has declared all out war on the Gingrich campaign. As of 7am Eastern time he has 9 negative mentions about Newt (none on Romney):
NEWT FLASHBACK 1983: REAGAN RESPONSIBLE FOR NATIONAL 'DECAY'...
NEWT 1986: 'The Reagan administration has failed, is failing... President Reagan is clearly failing'...
NEWT 1988: 'If Bush runs as continuation of Reaganism he will lose'... VIDEO...
INSIDER: GINGRICH REPEATEDLY INSULTED REAGAN
R. EMMETT TYRRELL: William Jefferson Gingrich...
COULTER: RE-ELECT OBAMA: VOTE NEWT!...
CNN: Gingrich admits his ABC claim was false during debate...
Gingrich tells UNIVISION: No perjury during my divorce depositions...
Marianne Gingrich lawyer: 'He was never deposed'...
I took Drudge out of my start up tabs. Won’t give him any more hits. FUMD.
Newt implemented a Reagan agenda while speaker. Romney explained he is NOT a Reagan republican. Newt has his weaknesses, but he is 80/20 a conservative. Romney is well under 50% conservative. He is miles better than commiebama but that ain’t saying much. He’s a terrible choice to be our party head.
Hell hath no wrath like that of a woman scorned .... hissyfit
LOL Romney is no where near a republican let alone a conservative and if there are sheep out there wanting to trust FOX and Drudge and their attacks and bias against Newt then so be it but that shows conservatives still have work to do in order to educate the sheep who call themselves republicans or conservatives.
FOX, DRUDGE, Coulter , Hannity etc are all talking heads for Romney is is the establishment and the establishment has sent out their memo to take Newt out.
As for Newt attacking ,please that is another piece of biased crap from FOX, Drudge etc.
Every admin has people who have disagreed that doe snot mean attack and Newt was coming from the right where as Romney has attacked from the left, hell he even ran to the left of Kennedy
If people don’t wake up to the MSM , yes including FOX , Drudge then the establishment gets their man and the people, the average folks, conservatives and this country lose out
ok...but I smell desperation. lol
I do see your point.
“When it comes to character and morality, the Clintons (both of them) are lower than Newt.”
Yes. And if they play their cards right they’ll have the advantage of a unified ‘rat party, the msm in their back pocket, and an electorate who nostalgically looks back at the clinton years as a time of economic plenty.
And what will Newt have? Great debating skills. And part of the GOP supporting him.
The difference is Jim clearly states his support in favor of Newt. Let Drudge do the same thing instead of pretending his unbiased. There are tons of negative stories on the other candidates. I really don’t care what Drudge does because I’ve never thought much of him to begin with.
“If Drudge uses the Drudge Report to support a candidate, it’s his site and his right to do so, just like FR is JimRob’s site.”
Again, nonsense.
Free Republic is a political discussion board. Drudge is NOT. Comparing the two is like comparing Rush to the network news.
Ann Coulter was on O’Reilly Tuesday night and she was desperately angry about Newt beating Romney in SC. As distraught as I’ve seen her. Her vision is that Romney is a cool, competent business titan who will beat Obama handily, while Newt will lose in a landslide. I think she’s been around DC too long and lacks the intuition to see what Romney is - and is not. To my mind, it is so obvious that Romney is immature because he’s rarely been challenged and has had almost everything go his way in life. He nervous giggles like a teenage girl. Obama is a cold fish with a personality disorder who will take down anyone in his way, aided at every turn by the media. Thus, Romney is not up to the task of defeating him. Yet she can’t see it. Her pal Drudge is continuing her Tuesday rant via his site.
It’s also possible that honest people can disagree, too, over who is best to lead.
Drudge is scam artist since promotes himself as a unbiased media site but he
Is actually a fraud and just as Biased / Slanted as CNN , ABC ,,
He is being called out for it !
His website is nothing but Newt AstroTurf !
So Matt needs to out himself as. a Romney bot rather
Than act like the rest of the very biased media that he supposedly
Exposes !
do you want Romney?
If so then explain how he ran to the left of kennedy and now says he is a conservative but now states he will not overturn obamacare, he wants VAT, he wants talks with the taliban, he did Romneycare, he’s pro homosexual agenda etc etc etc
Right there, homosexual agenda, the establishment has been up in the north east and the beltway for so long that they think their cross dressing homosexual elitist cocktail parties is America and it is not.
Gert away form there and see real America for once.
If there are idiots out there who think that Romney is a republican then it shows how stupid some are who call themselves republicans when they and he are not.
IMO, Coulter (who I bought several of he books and WAS a fan of) lost readership when she embraced the pink swastika. Thus she is upset and wanting to get payback on those who denied her the income she’d grown accustomed to.
She sold out her integrity for cash and the approval of the left. Nothing more to it.
Every morning I have always checked Drudge to see what will be discussed here that morning. I didn’t today. Not because he is so anti Newt, but that he seems to be giving Romney a pass.
we know who Romney is and he’;s no republican let alone conservative.
He a north east, establishment cross dressing homosexual agenda candidate who ran to the left of Kennedy in MA.
Newt maybe not perfect but he’;s better than Romney by miles and I hope we don’t have sheep in this party like the rats who think the media tells the truth all the time and that they think the MSM is not biased
I totally agree that Newt, unlike Romney, would be susceptible to powerful pulls from the right. Does that mean he has less of a "tethering?" I dunno. I think Bush was completely tied to one idea, namely that he had to protect the U.S. from foreign attacks at all costs---and that led him to do all sorts of other un-conservative things. Reagan's #1 goal was destroying communism, and that led him to sign off on big-deficit budgets and even to ignore his own policy of no negotiations with terrorists. But he achieved his goal.
I don't think President Newt would ever compromise the safety of the U.S. militarily, nor would he (generally) do anything to harm the U.S. economy. I do think that without proper pressure, he'd cave to the global warming crowd and the single-payer crowd. But he can be pushed and pulled and reasoned with. Romney can't because he is firmly "tethered" . . .
in liberalism.
Newt needs to be stopped since he is another bill clinton.
Tell me you’re joking or being sarc because one can surely thin that not even the dumbest person on this planet.
If you do think that then do you got for Romney who wants the homosexual agenda
Newt is what he is. I am not happy about the people in this race, we loose either way. Newt has a better chance of representing my views on some things. Mitt is to the left of Obama more than he is on the right.
I honestly don't know if I can vote this time around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.