Posted on 01/22/2012 6:45:03 AM PST by stratboy
Ann Coulter was just on Fox and Friends. She was crying over the fact that Romney got decimated in South Carolina. She offered a few talking points from the Romney camp including:
1. Newt is the lease conservative of all Candidates running. 2. Newt is unelectable because of his failed marriages. 3. The Freddy Mac non-issue. 4. John K asked a legitimate question and he is a completely fair and honorable reporter. 5. South Carolina is going back to it democratic roots and backing someone who calls Obama a socialist.
She laid out the establishment talking point that everyone who voted for McCain, will vote for Romney, that we need to get the independents.
OMG! The Right Wing Judy Garland?
Judy must be spinning in her grave!
You recall that I have a minor campaign to make sure RINO is correctly used, so if someone was NEVER a Democrat, or never a member of a minor party (NY Conservative party, American Independent, Independence, Communist, etc.) they can't ever have been anything other than a Republican.
At the same time they might well be Leftists, or Rightists.
We have more than enough words to cover Leftists. We are short on words to cover Rightists (and this is all in the European sense since we don't really have that sort of political variation in American politics). We do not now nor have we ever had a serious ROYALIST faction! ~ for example ~
As I understand it Newt's recommendation was just a perfunctory "let's support the new Republican nominee for xyz"~ she was chosen by the District Committee, not in a primary. The Conservative candidate didn't run as a Republican did he?
Anyway, the Democrat won, he served one term and then he was replaced by this young Republican who thought he could peddle his body to aspiring young starlets or something ~ and advertised it on Craig's list.
No doubt Tony Wiener would have been well advised to notice what happened there.
Let us hope that district gets some party leadership who know what to do in competitive situations.
I think the screwballs in that district started all the screw-ups.
Ann’s not a Birther so she just has no feel for that complex argument. On the other hand she’s a Mittbot, and just has no feel for anything ~ she’s gotta’ be numb to sponsor Romney.
Correction: Ann WILL get it and I don’t mean comprehension.
Ann Coulter has morphed into a blonde anorexic version of Peggy Noonan and both of them would be delighted if they had been born with the name ‘Megan Marshack’.
Peggy Noonan = Was always a RINO.
Ann Coulter = Went over to the dark side, now a Romney-RINO.
All the good that Ann has done with her prior exemplary writing is being undone by her insane flight from reality in backing Mitt-Witt.
cue Yoda: “a sad little thing, Coulter is”
The Article II presidential eligibility clause within our Constitution is clear and concise. So is the definition of natural born Citizen as understood by the Founders and put forth in their own writing, as well as in the Law of Nations and subsequent Supreme Court decisions.
Coulter knows Obama is NOT eligible. Her position is a calculated one.
Natural born citizen, of course, isn’t “clear” at all.
It is if you look to the original intent of the Founding fathers. And that is what matters.
An outsider who brought Socialized medicine in Massachusetts, a gun grabber and has flipped on about every issue.
No thank you!
Are we in FReeper "timeout?"
FYI--Nobody, regardless of age, likes a tattle-tail.
Do you think JR and the mods need help zotting? If so, what makes you and DV think it's your advice they need?
IOW, mind your own business.
Still, what’s the point of electing a liberal? We need to start to reverse the leftist agenda, not just slow it down.
I understand and I agree. Let’s also be honest, it will be difficult for ANY Republican to get elected over Obama. I used to think Mickey Mouse could beat him after the last 3 years. I’m not so sure now.
Oh, yes, TREASON is the primary thing in the Constitution when it comes to what the Founders thought about the ties of parents to children.
Even in TREASON there is no attainture of blood ~ that means, the children do not inherit the penalty.
Inmany countries it is commonly the case then when your debt ridden ancestor dies the members of the family OWE HIS DEBTS.
NOT HERE!
Actually they can and we have them in Southern states as well as nationally. There are many that are either are un-principled or have socialist or democrat or just a tendency to spend, many of these don’t have the courage to run as what they are and they will run and many times get elected as Republicans but don’t vote as a Republican ( RINO ). Many of these congregate in some areas and basically control the party to the exclusion of Conservatives (ELITEST). English is a wonderful language, industry, admen scientist, and journalist can create new words overnight, individuals can use words in ways that they were not previously used or intended and still communicate. It was not my mistake to use the term “Rino Elitest”, it conveyed what I meant to say and I seriously doubt anyone misunderstood me including you. We have too much crap going on to spend any more time on this.
Spit it out ~ make yourself clear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.