![](http://newsbusters.org/sites/default/files/main_photos/2012/January/Newsweek%20115.jpg)
This is not satire - it's for real!
1 posted on
01/16/2012 6:20:20 AM PST by
Rummyfan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Rummyfan
Why is Tina Brown so stupid?...............
2 posted on
01/16/2012 6:24:24 AM PST by
Red Badger
(If you are unemployed long enough, you are no longer unemployed.)
To: Rummyfan
I’m reminded of that comic that had all these people on the rope line yelling “We love you Obama” and swooning, and Obama says, “Where’s the press?”. His aide says, “That IS the press, sir.”
3 posted on
01/16/2012 6:24:44 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(Every single decision Obama makes is to harm America.)
To: Rummyfan
Haven't read this article, but I do have to agree with the premise the question poses. All one has to do is look at the pathetic way the Republicans in the House and Senate handled the "payroll tax cut" extension. One would have thought that the issue had never before been broached. No plan, and no forethought whatsoever.
Listening to the misguided attacks from each Presidential candidate's campaign is also painful. Using Democrat language to attack fellow Republicans rather than focusing on Obama's miserable record is just plain stupid.
4 posted on
01/16/2012 6:25:50 AM PST by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: Rummyfan
Leading from behind.
Zer0 lets the Mormon controlled Senate do the heavy lifting.
5 posted on
01/16/2012 6:27:01 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: Rummyfan
You have got to be kidding.
Unreal.
To: Rummyfan
Because they’re definition of ‘smart’ equals ‘brain washed’.. and that, we are not.
8 posted on
01/16/2012 6:34:19 AM PST by
Track9
(There IS revolution brewing..)
To: Rummyfan
We are seeing the very core belief of liberalism being proclaimed. Liberals have ALWAYS maintained that the vast majority of Americans are too dumb to make the “right” decisions in their lives and that liberal elites and the government nanny state must do it for them. Obama’s famed comment about those bitter people clinging to their guns and religion was another manifestation of this core belief. Of course anyone who does not espouse the liberal core belief is instantly labeled dumb, ignorant, racist, homophobic, redneck, a religious nut, etc.
9 posted on
01/16/2012 6:34:22 AM PST by
The Great RJ
("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
To: Rummyfan
![](http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/i/imperium774rr/20101229/20101229035630.jpg)
Posted to contrast the iconography ...
Also note side story (middle right) "Mrs. Santorum's suprising past"
13 posted on
01/16/2012 6:40:06 AM PST by
An.American.Expatriate
(Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
To: Rummyfan
I like this one better ...
![](http://thepeoplescube.com/images/Obama_Newsweek_King_2.jpg)
To: Rummyfan
It should be noted that Andrew Sullivan, who apparently wrote Newsweek's cover story, is a notorious
Trig Truther in league with the Alaska anklebiters, and wrote that he was proud to have helped stop Sarah Palin. Sullivan is also
part of the "gay mafia" that is demonizing all things Conservative.
And, oh yeah, he pretends to be a Conservative.
15 posted on
01/16/2012 6:40:58 AM PST by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: Rummyfan
At a glance I thought this was satire. It’s really getting hard to tell the difference these days.
16 posted on
01/16/2012 6:41:04 AM PST by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Rummyfan
Why is Harry Belafonte so dumb? Where should I start?
19 posted on
01/16/2012 6:41:46 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Rummyfan
You’ll notice they don’t refer to him as “the President”.
As in “Why are the President’s critics so dumb?”
21 posted on
01/16/2012 6:43:47 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
To: Rummyfan
The more pertinent question is “Why was News Weak sold lock stock and barrel for the less than paltry sum of $1.00”
Because it is a worthless rag with no readers and totally irrelevant to life in America.
The post amounts to site pollution
23 posted on
01/16/2012 6:47:23 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
To: Rummyfan
look at the author. Mr. homosexual marriage.
28 posted on
01/16/2012 6:54:37 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Rummyfan
I have the answer to the question: Because we’re not working together to get rid of him.
To: Rummyfan
Why is “Newsweek” still around?
32 posted on
01/16/2012 6:59:47 AM PST by
Biggirl
("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
To: Rummyfan
Interesting headline from a magazine whose content has shunk to the point where it could be published on the back of a postcard.
33 posted on
01/16/2012 7:00:31 AM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(A communist is just a liberal in a hurry)
To: Rummyfan
I actually read Sullivan's article. The headline is sensational. The article is just more evidence that Andrew is still in love with Obama. He tries to argue that Obama is a moderate who has brilliantly lead the economy back from the brink of collapse. He also slams Obama’s left wing critics too. This is clearly a case of Sullivan lovingly standing by his man — ridiculing both the Left and Right who misunderstand the “man with a plan.”
Btw, there is an even more digusting story in this rag alleging that Rick Santorum’s wife dated an abortion doctor when she was in her 20s. This magazine is disgusting.
35 posted on
01/16/2012 7:02:07 AM PST by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Rummyfan
Wasn’t Newsweek sold for 2 dollars?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson