Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retailers warn economy will be slowed by new trucker scheduling rules
The Hill ^ | 1/12/12 | Keith Laing

Posted on 01/13/2012 5:23:22 PM PST by Libloather

Retailers warn economy will be slowed by new trucker scheduling rules
By Keith Laing - 01/12/12 11:27 AM ET

New limits on the number of hours truck drivers can work per week enacted by the Department of Transportation will put the brakes on commerce, the lobbying group for retail companies said Thursday.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Association (FMCSA) announced last month that its new rules for trucker scheduling will limit the number of hours a driver can work to 70 per week. Under the old rules, truckers could drive 82 hours per week.

The Washington-based National Retail Federation (NRF) said those lost hours will increase the cost of doing business for its members.

“The new rule is a bit complicated but the ramifications are severe and will surely be felt on America’s roadways and throughout the retail industry supply chain,” NRF Vice President of Supply Chain Jon Gold wrote in a post on the organization’s blog Thursday.

“NRF believes that these changes will drive up retailer transportation costs and make trucking less safe due to the fact that more trucks will have to be added onto our already congested roadways to make up for those drivers on mandatory breaks,” Gold said.

He added that the new FMCSA rules “failed to truly recognize the importance of nighttime driving and early morning deliveries.”

“As we all know, many retailers rely upon nighttime driving and early morning deliveries as a way to keep costs down and trucks off the road during peak driving times to reduce congestion with passenger vehicles,” Gold said.

When the new rules were finalized by Obama administration transportation officials last month, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said they were an important step toward improving the safety of the national transportation system.

“Trucking is a difficult job, and a big rig can be deadly when a driver is tired and overworked,” LaHood said in a statement in December. “This final rule will help prevent fatigue-related truck crashes and save lives. Truck drivers deserve a work environment that allows them to perform their jobs safely.”

Safety advocates have pushed transportation officials to also reduce the number of hours truckers may drive each day, but DOT chose to maintain the daily 11-hour limit on driving. Under the FMCSA proposal, however, truckers will be required to take a break of at least 30 minutes for every eight hours they drive.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; retailers; rules; trucker; trucking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: formosa

and force more hours to the Mexican truckers.


21 posted on 01/13/2012 6:57:09 PM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
..truckers could drive 82 hours per week.

I thought slavery was outlawed. I'm all for this change.

22 posted on 01/13/2012 7:14:49 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

and force more hours to the Mexican truckers.”

We drove back from southeast Colorado to southeast Texas over Christmas. Grandson and I kept track of the number of trucks we passed which had a Mexico or Canada address on their rig. Less than 10% were from the U.S. Once it turned Midnight not many trucks on the road but the service areas were jammed with them stopping for a few hours rest.


23 posted on 01/13/2012 7:19:26 PM PST by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

These FMCSA hours-of-service rules have undergone multiple changes over the last ten years. This is just the latest generation, with other major changes in 2002 and 2005.


24 posted on 01/13/2012 7:22:40 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nope, SOP for Cook County, IL.


25 posted on 01/13/2012 7:29:15 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Familiar?

Yes, try FDR and look up Wickard v. Filburn.

26 posted on 01/13/2012 7:32:18 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
This is good for truckers in general as it means a higher demand for truckers.

And here I thought this was a conservative site. Why not just reduce the max hours down to 38.5 and double the number of truckers needed? No wait, you could eliminate trucks and then get the donkey breeders employed!

There's a real need for basic economics training here on FR. Read Bastiat, Smith, and look up FEE or Austrian Economics. In the meantime, stop commenting on economic issues. FDR was wrong.

27 posted on 01/13/2012 7:39:50 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“This should be good for the average driver as there will be fewer sleepy truck drivers on the road.”

No, it just means more will be cheating on the logbooks.

The easiest way to control someone is to make a criminal of them


28 posted on 01/13/2012 7:53:31 PM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Cheating on the logbooks(which has always been common) is becoming rather harder with the installation of computerized logging systems onboard the truck.Big companies are doing this for liability reasons and I heard these devices will be mandatory in trucks in a couple years by federal law.Well,maybe only in U.S. trucks...


29 posted on 01/14/2012 8:57:26 AM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
And I thought reading comprehension was a prerequisite for understanding the works of the Austrian economists.

Silly me.

30 posted on 01/14/2012 11:26:17 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

[Where do you suppose the waste goes when the truck has a outhouse hole in the floor?]

Getting off the subject, I’m old enough to remember when the toilets of passenger trains flushed directly onto the tracks. Conductors would lock the bathroom doors when the train was stopped at a station.


31 posted on 01/14/2012 4:53:32 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Grams A

Must have been a lot from Canada because only 2 or 3 carriers have been approved for Mexico to USA cross border, totaling as many trucks. One of those trucks being a straight hauling sea food in the Tijuana to San Diego area.

As much as people are freaking out about Mexican trucks coming up here the Mexicans don’t want to mess around with the FMCSA and on-board recorders that they’d be required to use.

Earlier this week Lockridge was reporting that only 6 carriers total had even applied. So chances are you didn’t see all that many trucks from Mexico.

Just sayin...


32 posted on 01/14/2012 6:35:24 PM PST by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson