Posted on 01/08/2012 3:49:48 PM PST by Snoopers-868th
UPDATE: An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.
Several Alabama citizens have filed a lawsuit within the Alabama Circuit Court to "prevent certification of President Barack Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary hearings."
(Excerpt) Read more at libertynewsonline.com ...
another one:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2040486/posts?page=997#997
The issue is not citizenship, the issue is whether he is a natural-born citizen. From the number of such comments here, it seems that there are a lot of people don’t know that there is a difference between citizen and natural-born citizen. Having only one parent a citizen makes it possible that “natural-born” does not apply.
997 posted on Saturday, 5 July 2008
THANK YOU! BB the traitorous pos is gone.
Pinging a few names that I can remember - BladeBryan is NO MORE. He was OUTED by Obama Exposer.
TOL, this piece of slime troll FINALLY got offed. He could use a send off. Read Obama Exposed comment #294. Tells it all.
Don’t forget about that pesky page that is missing from the divorce records... 12 pages in total, of which 11 are accounted for and published, and one is conspicuously missing. Remarkably, I first learned of this ‘quirk’ (subterfuge) by way of the illustrious/dubious Ed Hale of Plains Radio. I know, I know- few things stranger than that have occurred on this big blue spinning ball we call home.
;O)
freepersup
PS Keep the faith and... KEEP DIGGING!
Fogbow (aka Justin Shilo) is that you OBot troll? Most of us figured you to be a FogBlower spamming the web with your OBot poop.
So Fogblower, what happened to this tag line quote over a FogBlow la la land?
Buttfly Bilderberg made it disappear when the heat on FR started to get too much for you FoGblower. LoL.
You are probably referring to the Soetero divorce.
IRC, in the context of the surviving pages the missing page seemed likely to contain the birthplaces of some or all of the children (which included Brock).
What are the odds that a filing maintained by the court system would be missing only a page?
Let alone possibly an extremely pertinent page in the filing of a current high-profile proceeding which concerns a major public controversy. This reminds one of the ability to unseal the transcript of a court proceeding that was sealed.
On the other hand, there was material a couple of years ago to the effect that G'ma Dunham performed volunteer work at the courthouse.
lj, thanks for the ping—it brought a big smile to my face!
Obama Exposer, thanks for revealing the truth about Blade; it was most appreciated and ultimately devastating [to him—not to us!].
BD, thanks for notifying the Head Honcho, w gratify results.
BladeBryan, thanks for being...
gone.
gratify = gratifying
Sigh.
My point was that even if she got a Marriage license and had a ceremony, Barry is still a bastard because Barack Sr.s pre-existing marriage would render any marriage to Stanley Ann invalid. It is a legal technicality that does leave the result the same. Barack Obama Jr. Is an illegitimate bastard. He is probably the first bonafied actual “bastard” who has occupied the office of the Presidency.
BHO Sr legally still would be the father since it is his seed (reportedly), albeit it is possible that his marriage to SAD would have been made null and void. Still makes BHO II ineligible for POTUS because his biological father was a non-US citizen.
He'll receive the Medal of Honor for extraordinary lies from his boss, 0b0z0.
He'll also receive 21-fart salute performed by a squad of special 0h0m0's communist fags.
About damn time, but there is another on this thread that has deserved it since 2006. His days are hopefully numbered, one of the biggest obama defenders on FR since the day he joined.
Well, it’s actually quite a bit more than 5 pages. I give you a week, tops, but don’t get scared, I’ve been wrong before, but not often.
You came to FR in 2006 to post on the CW threads and bash Southerners. Then in 2008 you went into full defend obama mode. I’ve seen you repeatedly make fun of all conservatives and everyone in the GOP but I can’t find a single, solitary post where you say anything bad about obama. Not one. You even unloaded on Reagan.
Also, you mentioned you were banned before in this post:
The Wizard of the Saddle
Wednesday, August 01, 2007 6:12:18 PM • 284 of 333
Bubba Ho-Tep to stand watie
THEN, please head back over to DU (where i heard you were hanging out)
____________________________________________________________
“What, from the same “little bird” who told you I was going to be banned back in March? Sorry. I poke around over there once in a while, but those people are DUMB, and I’ve never been able to find a good discussion of the Civil War. If you get me banned again I’ll go to the History Channel boards. There are several Civil War threads there, but they aren’t as entertaining as the ones here. “
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1869315/posts?page=284#284
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!
What about these posts on your views on homosexuals? Pretty freaky, to say the least:
NOTE* On the posts below, click on the links so it’s easier to see what was said by who, the other poster and your responses:
Monday, December 10, 2007 1:42:36 PM • 133 of 159
Bubba Ho-Tep to puroresu
Just for the record, do you support “gay rights” legislation and do you favor booting the scouts out of these facilities unless they agree to accept homosexuality?
___________________________________________________________
“Hmm. “gay rights legislation” covers a lot of territory. You’ll have to be more specific. Let’s say I don’t believe in special privileges for anyone, and I don’t like discrimination in general. On gay marriage, I usually come back to asking why the government’s in the marriage business at all. Do I favor booting the scouts out in this case? No, I don’t. I think the Scouts do good work. But since I’m neither a Scout nor a resident of the Philadelphia metro area, I don’t feel much passion for this particular issue either way. I’m just an interested onlooker.
Boy Scouts Lose Philadelphia Lease in Gay-Rights Fight
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 3:08:15 PM • 147 of 159
Bubba Ho-Tep to puroresu
Sure. Homosexuality is always unnatural.
And yet homosexual behavior can be found in all kinds of animals
And it spreads diseases more than heterosexuality.
Anal sex spreads diseases more than vaginal sex, it’s true. But not all gays have anal sex, while many heterosexuals do.
And it must be predatory to propagate itself.
Because heterosexuals never seduce people, right?
And it can’t produce offspring.
Lots of things don’t produce offspring. In fact, I can only think of one thing that does. Doesn’t mean the rest of them are bad.
It also produces immaturity in its practitioners, particularly the males, who never grow out of the “girls have cooties” mode.
You don’t actually know many gay people, do you?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1935732/posts?page=146#146
Boy Scouts Lose Philadelphia Lease in Gay-Rights Fight
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 4:33:40 PM • 157 of 159
Bubba Ho-Tep to puroresu
In any event, what possible natural reason could there be for a male inserting his organ into another male’s rear opening? Whether animal or human?
It feels good?
How many heterosexual males are likely to desire anal sex with a boy, as opposed to homosexual males? That’s the relavent issue vis-a-vis the Scouts.
And the scouts are entitled to ban gay scoutleaders. But it’s certain acts practiced by both gays and straights that are more likely to spread disease, not homosexuality in and of itself. Your position was that homsexuality was bad because it spread disease.
You’d be amazed how many homosexuals report that they were “introduced” to sex as a minor by an older person.
I can say the same of heterosexuals. There’s usually someone experienced leading someone inexperienced.
God and/or nature (take your pick) provides us with two sexes, who are naturally opposites, and who can bond to reproduce.
I guess I just don’t see reproduction as the end-all and be-all of human existence.
Not a whole lot, but some.
Like I said, I know lots, and I’ve never seen that gynophobic behavior you describe. I’ve seen far more misogyny from straight men.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1935732/posts?page=154#154
If obama does something “bad” you’ve always got a quick response and show that Republican president did it twice as bad.
Your mission here on FR is clear. You came to post with your friend Non_Sequitur on CW threads, then you moved onto defending obama threads which you continue to do. I guess you miss your 4x zotted friend who was from Chicago just like you.
Where were you during the week of the elections in 2008? At the celebration party in Chicago no doubt. You disappeared from FR during that time.
I would post all of the pages of your posts which make quite an impact but it would take up so much space, not sure JR would appreciate me doing that. Would you like me to send them to him? I can do that.
Thanks for your hard work of compiling the filthy evidence. Everyone knows what this guy is up to.
:)
My guts tell me that *IF* that page were a copy of barry's original birth certificate, those clerks (or others with access to it) would have leaked it out the back door by now. It very well could be a judges order regarding Barry's birth certificate, or some such.
I haven’t forgotten about it. For quite a while I thought it might very well be a copy of the missing birth certificate, but after thinking about it a bit more, I figured that if it was a copy of the missing birth certificate, the clerks at the Divorce records office would likely have snuck a copy out the back door by now. I think it is more likely a judge’s order amending Barry’s birth certificate, or some other sealed order.
Oh, I agree, but I have read arguments from people that claim if they weren't legally married, then his citizenship is based entirely on the mother, (therefore making him not a dual citizen) but if they WERE legally married, he is a dual citizen regardless of who is the actual father, as far as the eyes of the law are concerned.
My position is that whatever the truth *IS*, I want to know it.
Welcome aboard!
Does not matter if legally married or not. If the fogbot argument would apply then all those professional athletes who have multiple baby mamas and babies wouldn’t be vulnerable to those paternity lawsuits filed against them for child support...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.