Replies

Well, it’s actually quite a bit more than 5 pages. I give you a week, tops, but don’t get scared, I’ve been wrong before, but not often.

You came to FR in 2006 to post on the CW threads and bash Southerners. Then in 2008 you went into full defend obama mode. I’ve seen you repeatedly make fun of all conservatives and everyone in the GOP but I can’t find a single, solitary post where you say anything bad about obama. Not one. You even unloaded on Reagan.

Also, you mentioned you were banned before in this post:

The Wizard of the Saddle
Wednesday, August 01, 2007 6:12:18 PM • 284 of 333
Bubba Ho-Tep to stand watie
THEN, please head back over to DU (where i heard you were hanging out)
____________________________________________________________
“What, from the same “little bird” who told you I was going to be banned back in March? Sorry. I poke around over there once in a while, but those people are DUMB, and I’ve never been able to find a good discussion of the Civil War. If you get me banned again I’ll go to the History Channel boards. There are several Civil War threads there, but they aren’t as entertaining as the ones here. “

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1869315/posts?page=284#284

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!

What about these posts on your views on homosexuals? Pretty freaky, to say the least:
NOTE* On the posts below, click on the links so it’s easier to see what was said by who, the other poster and your responses:

Monday, December 10, 2007 1:42:36 PM • 133 of 159
Bubba Ho-Tep to puroresu
Just for the record, do you support “gay rights” legislation and do you favor booting the scouts out of these facilities unless they agree to accept homosexuality?
___________________________________________________________
“Hmm. “gay rights legislation” covers a lot of territory. You’ll have to be more specific. Let’s say I don’t believe in special privileges for anyone, and I don’t like discrimination in general. On gay marriage, I usually come back to asking why the government’s in the marriage business at all. Do I favor booting the scouts out in this case? No, I don’t. I think the Scouts do good work. But since I’m neither a Scout nor a resident of the Philadelphia metro area, I don’t feel much passion for this particular issue either way. I’m just an interested onlooker.

Boy Scouts Lose Philadelphia Lease in Gay-Rights Fight
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 3:08:15 PM • 147 of 159
Bubba Ho-Tep to puroresu

Sure. Homosexuality is always unnatural.
And yet homosexual behavior can be found in all kinds of animals
And it spreads diseases more than heterosexuality.
Anal sex spreads diseases more than vaginal sex, it’s true. But not all gays have anal sex, while many heterosexuals do.
And it must be predatory to propagate itself.
Because heterosexuals never seduce people, right?
And it can’t produce offspring.
Lots of things don’t produce offspring. In fact, I can only think of one thing that does. Doesn’t mean the rest of them are bad.
It also produces immaturity in its practitioners, particularly the males, who never grow out of the “girls have cooties” mode.
You don’t actually know many gay people, do you?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1935732/posts?page=146#146

Boy Scouts Lose Philadelphia Lease in Gay-Rights Fight
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 4:33:40 PM • 157 of 159
Bubba Ho-Tep to puroresu

In any event, what possible natural reason could there be for a male inserting his organ into another male’s rear opening? Whether animal or human?
It feels good?
How many heterosexual males are likely to desire anal sex with a boy, as opposed to homosexual males? That’s the relavent issue vis-a-vis the Scouts.
And the scouts are entitled to ban gay scoutleaders. But it’s certain acts practiced by both gays and straights that are more likely to spread disease, not homosexuality in and of itself. Your position was that homsexuality was bad because it spread disease.
You’d be amazed how many homosexuals report that they were “introduced” to sex as a minor by an older person.
I can say the same of heterosexuals. There’s usually someone experienced leading someone inexperienced.
God and/or nature (take your pick) provides us with two sexes, who are naturally opposites, and who can bond to reproduce.
I guess I just don’t see reproduction as the end-all and be-all of human existence.
Not a whole lot, but some.
Like I said, I know lots, and I’ve never seen that gynophobic behavior you describe. I’ve seen far more misogyny from straight men.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1935732/posts?page=154#154

If obama does something “bad” you’ve always got a quick response and show that Republican president did it twice as bad.

Your mission here on FR is clear. You came to post with your friend Non_Sequitur on CW threads, then you moved onto defending obama threads which you continue to do. I guess you miss your 4x zotted friend who was from Chicago just like you.

Where were you during the week of the elections in 2008? At the celebration party in Chicago no doubt. You disappeared from FR during that time.

I would post all of the pages of your posts which make quite an impact but it would take up so much space, not sure JR would appreciate me doing that. Would you like me to send them to him? I can do that.