Ginger's looking less and less credible. Unfortunately, the damage has been done. Ginger's judgement-proof, nothing to be done about her. Most people will have heard the accusation, relatively few will hear about the story falling apart.
Posted on 12/01/2011 6:52:37 AM PST by sevinufnine
Honestly, you can't make this stuff up.
Not only did Ginger White lose a libel case this year, according to a former friend and business partner, Ms. White is a lesbian.
And, on top of all of that, Kimberly Vay, who had a relationship with Ms. White, stated that Herman Cain was "never mentioned" during the years they spent as partners.
(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.com ...
How many times are you going to fall for this tactic? How gullible are you, did you fall for the Palin charges too? What happened to innocent until some evidence is shown?
Pray for Cain
Ginger's looking less and less credible. Unfortunately, the damage has been done. Ginger's judgement-proof, nothing to be done about her. Most people will have heard the accusation, relatively few will hear about the story falling apart.
With all liars there are tiny facts in their ‘creations’.
i.e. She may have met Cain in a business environment. What business is she supposedly involved with. Booking travel arrangements for CEO’s??
Perhaps she appeared successful and he contacted her at various times related to that business. Then, she ‘fell on hard times’ and he trusted her enough to help her financially.
When she became a ‘pest’ he probably gave up. From her treatment of the business partners - she has proven to be a vindictive, unstable individual.
Herman’s campaign just ignited one more ‘grudge’ episode. Her embellishment of ‘inappropriate’ is code for ‘nothing happened and ‘no sex for cash’ is her way out of libel & slander.
ABC article preserved here, which is also where I got the pic from my last post.
Don't know what link you were using, but I found the ABC News article on their site.
I’ve lost a ton of respect for conservatives after all this.
What a bunch of idiot losers.
Fisrt the enemy directly states what it’s going to do, then it does it, and conservatives fall for it hook, line and sinker.
DEEEERRR HUUUUURRR.
The MSM hates conservatives sooooooo much that they don’t care if Cain’s black - they don’t care if a former lover is a lesbian... They ONLY care that he’s conservative.
Good points. If I may attempt to quote C.S. Lewis,,,,
“adding a bit of truth to any lie makes that lie all the stronger”.
All you say makes sense. I will support Cain until he either wins the presidency...or choses to drop from contention.
“As for Cain, if he were truly innocent of these accusations, I believe he would react differently. I.e. he would be more genuinely angry and vehement. My BS-detector goes off when I hear his denials — his responses just strike me as unsteady and evasive.”
He already stated that the accusations are ridiculous.
What more do you want him to do?
Are you trying to say he must ‘prove’ the accusations aren’t true?
Funny, I always thought the ‘accuser’ was the one that had to prove the accusation ‘ARE’ true.
And,BTW, Ms.White has already stated that it was a ‘casual’ relationship. Even when pressed if there was any ‘sex’ involved, she didn’t respond and repeated the ‘casual relationship’ mantra.
There isn’t a Prosecutor anywhere that would even attempt to bring a charge against someone without ‘proof’.
He’d be laughed out of the court room.
And this ‘woman’ should be laughed at as well.
The best thing Cain could do at this point is to shut up and let the woman’s past and words hang herself.
She seems to be doing a good job of it.
You are attempting to impose your own personality traits on other people.
Some people just don't have it in them to work up anger. Even if most people would find it appropriate.
Other people can only work up anger when someone else is wronged, but never when they are wronged.
I would never base an assesment in something like this upon the apparent anger shown by one of the parties.
For the sake of his good name and family. That is worth more than any amount of money he can collect from these Skanks.
:: I think Ginger is a man. ::
Careful LL, the “lookism” concern trolls are going to start tossing slime at you.
There is no need to sue for the sake of his good name.
Within the next few weeks, the truth will come out on its own and you can’t get a case to trial in less time.
In fact, in most states it takes two to three years after you begin the process.
He could file a suit tomorrow, but that will not help him. By the time the case is heard or settled, we will be in the election cycle for 2016.
it seems obvious to me that this woman is receiving a sizeble payoff to come up with the story. In a courtroom she would be called an unreliable source of information, but in the public her words are taken as gospel.
Who is paying her and how much??
Not sure who, but nothing would suprise me.
Of course Stephie Stepalloverit didn’t bother to ask Ginger those pertinent questions in his interview.
I don't think it's the devil, I think it's the powers that be in the Republican party. I think Cain scares them because he's not a party puppet.
Neither is the ABC article that was the source for the Examiner article.
I’m confused...
1984's memory holes have become real!
ENOUGH of this sanctimonious B/S. I'm not solidly in Cain's camp, but I'll use my why-I-voted-for-Hayworth rationale: I don't care if Cain is caught doing funny things with farm animals out behind the barn, he'll get my vote if the candidate. He's from OUTSIDE the Beltway and not a career hack like the rest of them - that's why all this "shocking" crap is being thrown at him. After Clinton, any outrage is posing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.