Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama administration likely to delay decision on Keystone pipeline (Article updated at link)
The Hill ^ | November 10, 2011 | Andrew Restuccia

Posted on 11/10/2011 10:29:32 AM PST by jazusamo

The Obama administration will announce Thursday that it is reevaluating the route of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, a move that will likely delay a final decision on the project, sources briefed by the administration said.

TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone XL pipeline would carry oil sands crude from Alberta to refineries in Texas. The pipeline has set off a firestorm in Washington, with critics raising environmental concerns and proponents arguing the project will boost the economy.

Reuters reported on the decision to reevaluate the pipeline route earlier Thursday.

The State Department and the Whte House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enviros; jobs; keystonexl; obama; pipeline; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
No surprise. Obama won't do what's good for jobs and the country, he'll only do what's best for him. By making a decision before the election he'll either tick off unions or enviros.
1 posted on 11/10/2011 10:29:34 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Build refiners in the north, cut transportation cost leave all of those people and their property out of it. A win win situation.
2 posted on 11/10/2011 10:34:01 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
In further breaking news:

1. Pope is Catholic
2. Bears s**t in the woods

3 posted on 11/10/2011 10:34:51 AM PST by ken5050 (Cain/Gingrich 2012!!! because sharing a couch with Pelosi is NOT the same as sharing a bed with her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
... he'll either tick off unions or enviros.

Worse, he'll have to explain to the ME oil sheiks why he's helping the Canadians break their hold on the US market.

4 posted on 11/10/2011 10:36:56 AM PST by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

A good point. It would also cut into his reelection campaign contributions that he supposedly doesn’t get from those sheiks.


5 posted on 11/10/2011 10:42:24 AM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
While American needs leadership, stable source of energy and more jobs, President Obama votes “present”.
6 posted on 11/10/2011 10:42:36 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

7 posted on 11/10/2011 10:42:49 AM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Build refiners in the north

You think that oil and bitumen needs a pipeline but gasoline and jet fuel doesn't?

8 posted on 11/10/2011 10:43:52 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
While American needs leadership, stable source of energy and more jobs, President Obama votes “present”.

Well said and sadly all too true, Obama is no leader and never will be.

9 posted on 11/10/2011 10:45:24 AM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Do not be stupid, the usage is all over the country, they have air ports in Denver, and maybe one other location in the north no matter what you think, do you think that no one has transportation in the north. Yes I am sure one of those northern states may have a city and a piper cub airport. They have been hauling fuel to the military by the 21 team for some time now. I guess????
10 posted on 11/10/2011 10:51:19 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

More Canadian oil will go to China at the higher transportation costs then. There’s also the indefinite situation with Iran having nukes. Have fun with the higher fuel prices for years and years, thank the socialist NIMBYs of both political parties (mostly pensioners and local government employees) for keeping fuel prices up. Their “property values” take precedence over your property rights, and now, oil availability for our country. They own all that they see.


11 posted on 11/10/2011 10:53:22 AM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in a noisy avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Yeah, North Dakota has a large demand for gasoline.

We still have to build pipelines to the places that need the product.

And refineries produce more than transportation fuel. That chemical industry is already built in the gulf coast area.


12 posted on 11/10/2011 10:54:59 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Yes and new refinery's and new processing plants make new long term jobs, digging a hole and filling it does not.
13 posted on 11/10/2011 10:59:05 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Yes, there’s little doubt that China is sitting back waiting for Obama to side with our enviro-nuts and nix this, the pipeline will then be built to the Canadian coast.


14 posted on 11/10/2011 11:02:09 AM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And how about the refinery that is no longer needed since it’s customers are served by some other refinery?

We have existing refineries connected to the existing refined products and chemical plants running on lots of imported oil from overseas.

We need to replace that oil source with a more dependable source from Canada.

We do not need to spend billions building the facilities we already have. We need to bring the Canadian oil to them.


15 posted on 11/10/2011 11:10:17 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The Obama administration will announce Thursday that it is reevaluating the route of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, a move that will likely delay a final decision on the project, sources briefed by the administration said.
Pure theater. He's not reevaluating the Keystone XL pipeline, only the route it'll take.
There's too much money wrapped up in this already and it's been in the works for years! The processing units were built before the pipeline.

Motiva’s oil refinery expansion in Port Arthur nears completion
Motiva, a joint venture between affiliates of global oil heavyweights Royal Dutch Shell and Saudi Aramco...
Snip...The company has been working since 2006 to almost double the capacity of its existing refinery in Port Arthur, Texas.
Snip...By the time the Motiva Port Arthur Refinery expansion is completed (in 2012)...
Snip...The expanded refinery is also set up to process heavy crude from the proposed Keystone XL pipeline expansion which plans to transport crude oil from Alberta’s oil sands to the Gulf Coast.

Amateur!

16 posted on 11/10/2011 11:13:36 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Present”!


17 posted on 11/10/2011 11:18:58 AM PST by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
BS, thank god you do not get to decree anything. And those half ass facilities get closed down all the time because of storms.
18 posted on 11/10/2011 11:19:43 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Do you understand we have already become a net exporter of refined products?

We don't have a shortage of refineries. We have a shortage of the feed stock to them.

Why would ConocoPhillips or any other company want to shutdown their working refinery to spend money and build a new one for 8 to 10 billion dollars?

19 posted on 11/10/2011 11:22:55 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
And those half ass facilities get closed down all the time because of storms.

The refineries are rarely down for storms. It is the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas Production that routinely gets shut down for the storms. We need more stable input to the refineries, like this pipeline.

20 posted on 11/10/2011 11:24:43 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson