Posted on 11/07/2011 11:11:19 AM PST by Nachum
Edited on 11/07/2011 12:05:49 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Cain has already denounced the two previous allegations of sexual harassment against him as false, and suggested at least one of the women was a poor worker whose job performance was not up to par. But an ABC News investigation found that both of the women who received settlements from the NRA are career Federal employees. The woman in Maryland represented by Bennett has worked for years as agent of one sort or another of various agencies of the federal government.
I don’t understand the “But”...
The type of people who would file false “sexual harassment” claims after receiving negative job status updates are the type of people who would work for government agencies where they don’t have to work and can’t be fired?
There’s no “but” there...
Being a long term federal employee certainly does not negate being not up to par
Just saw the Gloria Allread live broadcast. The new woman making allegations is 100% credible. Cain is now toast.
Well, that settles it, then.
The highest quality employees I’ve worked with include some feds and a high number of private sector workers. The very highest quality I’ve been involved with have had no federal client - they work to keep the private firm healthy and productive. I’m with them now in a contract about to end.
Umm, you’re kidding, right?
I missed it, was her name Anita?
Ditto. The Cain Train has just derailed.
—The type of people who would file false sexual harassment claims after receiving negative job status updates are the type of people who would work for government agencies where they dont have to work and cant be fired?—
Exactly. I’ve been around the blook enough times to see that in action.
No, it supports it. Federal worker and not up to par so terribly often go together.
—Just saw the Gloria Allread live broadcast. The new woman making allegations is 100% credible. Cain is now toast.—
Ok, I’ve seen so much satire and so much sarcasm here lately that I have to apologegically ask, was that sarcasm. Seeing as how I’ve read the information on that broadcast, I can only assume it is sarcasm.
What were the specific allegations she made?
Blook = block.
Naw,let’s just make it blook. It’s more fun that way.
I wouldn't bet on that, as much as you may want it to be so.
—No, it supports it. Federal worker and not up to par so terribly often go together.—
It’s been the standing joke for decades.
This sounds like the Dept. of Agriculture woman employee who shook down that agency for millions in the Pigford settlement. Any federal employee who profits from bringing suit against the government should be fired immediately.
Orly?
What were the allegations?
He bit her lip and raped her?
He called her into his office and said "Kiss it?"
Gotta be sarcasm. The lady couldn’t keep herself from laughing. Notice also the had “purgury” documents from the people she supposedly told, but not her. She also doesn’t want to go to court...
Not sure what parts of her story are true and false, but my bet is the is a lot more false than true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.