Skip to comments.
See Which Congressmen Voted Against 'In God We Trust'
Fox News ^
| November 1, 2011
| Todd Starnes
Posted on 11/03/2011 2:06:19 PM PDT by opentalk
The House of Representatives passed a bi-partisan resolution Tuesday night reaffirming In God We Trust as the official motto of the United States. The 396-9 vote came at the request of Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA) in part over President Obamas refusal to correct remarks he made that misstated the motto as E pluribus unum instead of In God We Trust.
Lawmakers voting against In God We Trust include Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich), Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA), Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO), Rep. Mike Honda (D-CA), Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), and Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA). Voting present were Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) and Rep. Melvin Watt (D-NC).
The bi-partisan resolution not only affirms In God We Trust as the national motto, but it also encourages its display in public buildings and government institutions.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; US: California; US: Georgia; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota; US: Missouri; US: New York; US: North Carolina; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bobbyscott; california; congress; emanuelcleaver; garyackerman; georgia; hankjohnson; ingodwetrust; jerroldnadler; judychu; justinamash; keithellison; melvinwatt; michigan; mikehonda; minnesota; missouri; newyork; northcarolina; petestark; randyforbes; symbolism; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Cicero
Judging by the way our congresscritters suck up to Islam, Keith Ellison will get his wish soon enough.
21
posted on
11/03/2011 3:29:48 PM PDT
by
353FMG
(Liberalism is Satan's handiwork.)
To: xzins
Then the Star Spangled Banner in Triumph shall wave
O'er the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave
22
posted on
11/03/2011 3:32:03 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: grellis; MichCapCon; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...
Includes Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich), thanks opentalk.
23
posted on
11/03/2011 3:44:30 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Celebrate Jim's Birthday!
Click On The Balloons And Party!
24
posted on
11/03/2011 4:05:06 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
25
posted on
11/03/2011 4:10:58 PM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: opentalk
The galling thing to me is that this is not a matter of religious loyalty it is a matter of national tradition, history and patriotism.
Even if it were a matter of religious loyalty they are supposed to represent their constituents not their personal feelings. Scumbags all!
26
posted on
11/03/2011 4:23:25 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
MICHIGAN PING LIST
Please freepmail me if you wish to be added or dropped from the mitten ping.
Amash was in full spin today
27
posted on
11/03/2011 4:53:32 PM PDT
by
grellis
(I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
To: grellis
Amash was in full spin today
His vote is kind of unexpected. I'm assuming Walberg voted for God.
28
posted on
11/03/2011 5:15:56 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
To: opentalk
So militant muslim Keith Ellison voted present. Could it be that he’s concerned about the reaction of his constituents?
Pussy.
29
posted on
11/03/2011 5:39:54 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I guess I'll keep living until I die.)
To: opentalk
The usual list of suspects.
30
posted on
11/03/2011 6:54:27 PM PDT
by
reg45
(I'm not angry that Lincoln freed the slaves. I'm angry that Franklin Roosevelt bought them back.)
To: cripplecreek
I’m sure Walberg voted for “In God We Trust.” Bill Hardiman would have voted for the bill as well . . . .
31
posted on
11/03/2011 8:34:00 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: grellis
How did Amash spin his NAY vote? Did he say that it exceeded Congress’s ennumerated powers, à la Ron Paul? (Then again, didn’t Paul vote for the bill?)
32
posted on
11/03/2011 8:36:55 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: prairiebreeze
Weird about Ellison. Yes he may call his god “Allah”, but doesn’t he still think of Him as “God”?
33
posted on
11/03/2011 8:52:05 PM PDT
by
boop
("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
To: ReformationFan
Justin Amash (MI) is in the 3rd district. By Grand Rapids. He is 31 years old
..The only Republican to vote against "In God We Trust".
34
posted on
11/04/2011 1:39:40 AM PDT
by
opentalk
To: ReformationFan
35
posted on
11/04/2011 3:55:07 AM PDT
by
pithyinme
(Obama stimulus is 5 times the cost & half the satisfaction...)
To: AuH2ORepublican
"Displaying 'In God We Trust' on public property is appropriate in some circumstances," he wrote. "There is no need to push for the phrase to be on all federal, state and local buildings. "The fear that unless 'In God We Trust' is displayed throughout the government, Americans will somehow lose their faith in God, is a dim view of the profound religious convictions many citizens have," he added. "Trying to score political points with unnecessary resolutions should not be Congress' priority." However, the legislation is not a mandate--it supports and encourages the display of the motto in all public buildings, schools, government installations, etc. It also seems to make it more difficult for atheistic whack jobs to call for, and be granted, removal of the motto. Sure, it's relatively meaningless legislation, but to me it's a sway in the right direction.
36
posted on
11/04/2011 4:58:20 AM PDT
by
grellis
(I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
To: pithyinme
Seems to me that he was rather out of focus on this issue. And he is “principled” in a way that only someone who has never worked in the private sector (he went from law school straight into politics) could be—without any sense of the effects that his actions will have on the real world. But that’s what happens when we elect a 30-year-old with no military or private-sector experience based on his voting record over 18 months in the state legislature. Now liberals will point to how “even conservatives” oppose having “In God We Trust” as our national motto. Heck of a job, Jason.
Justin Amash needs to grow up.
37
posted on
11/04/2011 7:49:19 AM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: opentalk
I’ve never heard of the young rep, but then Grand Rapids means Gerald Ford, which means moderate, really liberal.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson