Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Purpose of FR and why we can never support Mitt Romney
vanity | Oct 15, 2011 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 10/15/2011 1:51:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Edited on 10/15/2011 1:54:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Our purpose and goal on FR is to restore, defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity!!

The goal of the domestic enemy (the left), i.e., the statist liberals, Marxists and progressives is just the opposite.

The goal of the establishment RINO is to gain control of political power, but not to otherwise rock the boat. The boat continues taking on water and listing sharper to port every time the left takes over, but the unprincipled RINOs do absolutely nothing to right her when they get a chance. In fact, the RINOs actually tack on plenty of their own unconstitutional baggage when they're in power and so our ship of state today is in pretty bad shape.

RINO Romney is one of the worst. We can thank him for being the chief architect of ObamaCare, which if we cannot get overturned and repealed, will finally accomplish the left's major objective of shredding the final remnants of our tattered constitution and ending our God-given Liberty forever (they think).

The liberals believe our constitution is a flawed document written in a different time for different circumstances by rich old racist white men and no longer applies to today's circumstances. They're now even trying to promote the idea that the constitution was never intended to limit or restrict the powers of government.

Like hell! That was and is its primary intent! And we who have sworn an oath to defend it, will defend it--from all enemies, foreign and domestic!

And that's FR's purpose and reason for being.

Romney may be a Republican, and that's questionable, because he's violated nearly every plank in the Republican party's official pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Constitution, pro-Liberty platform, but he's definitely no conservative. In fact his record is that of a statist liberal progressive. And he's a total fraud to boot, with a nasty habit of lying--about everything. He'll do and say anything if he thinks it will help him get elected. He's a two-bit, unprincipled political whore.

Here's Romney's record on some of our primary issues of concern compared to Obama's:

Issue: Obama Romney
Pro-Abortion check check
Gun-grabber check check
Gay rights check check
Gov forced healthcare check check
Tax payer funded abortion check check
Man-made global warming check check
Liberal judges check check
Liberal appointees check check
Ted Kennedy pal check check
Proven liar check check
Fraud check check
Liberal Progressive check check
Enemy of Reagan/Bush check check
Enemy of the tea party check check
Enemy of Liberty check check
Defender of the Constitution no no
Conservative no no
Works across the aisle no yes
Architect of ObamaCare no yes
Domestic Enemy check check
Useful idiot check check

All of the above plus much more is documented in the RomneyTruth files on FR. Click the RomneyTruthFile keyword at the top of the main page. Also watch the "New Romney Campaign Video" also linked at the top of the main page. Watch it all the way through. I even saw some clips I'd never seen before. Pretty damning stuff for anyone running for president as a Republican.

Let's face it folks, the elite establishment RINO corps hates the tea party, hates conservatives, are afraid and even ashamed to have us identify ourselves as Republicans, feel we are dangerous extremist, racist, bigoted bible thumping, gun-toting, flag-waving neanderthals. The tea party is the best thing to happen for America since 1776 and our tea party candidates are the best thing for the GOP since Ronald Reagan, but what do the elite establishment RINOs do? They declare us the enemy! They went after Sarah Palin and some of our other tea party candidates with bared fangs and talons. Karl Rove and company were and continue to be as nasty and shameless on the attack as the nastiest lying liberal. Sarah Palin was the most exciting new face in GOP politics in a century and would have been a landslide 57 state victory over the corrupt, lying Marxist/progressive Obama. But the good ol' boys, i.e., the elite establishment corrupt crony capitalist GOP bastards could have none of that. Instead, they've opted to go all in with a corrupt, lying statist/progressive of their own: Willard (the Rat) Romney.

Well, good luck getting the Rat elected without the committed grassroots, pro-life, pro-constitution conservatives or the majority of the tea party.

FR, for one, will not play that game. NO MORE RINOS!!

No Romney. NOT ON FR!! NOT ON MY WATCH!!

Should Romney be "the one," I'll vote for the down-ticket conservatives on the ballot, but I will not vote for an abortionist, gay-rights pushing, gun-grabbing, global-warming advocating, big government healthcare mandating statist/progressive for president!! I'd rather write-in the name of the tea party conservative who best matches my beliefs. Romney is no 80 percenter. Not even close! He's the backstabbing enemy within.

God bless America!!

Long live the Republic!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; 2sides4romney; 3sides4romney; 4sides4romney; acorn4romney; allsides4romney; amen; backstabberromney; badgovromney; badsportromney; benedictromney; bigdigromney; biggovernment; bishopromney; bluebloodrepublicans; brutusromney; bugzapper; byebyerinos; carpetbaggerromney; commiecare; democratromney; dnc4romney; donatetofr; doyoustandforfr; elections; establishment; establishment4mitt; establishment4romney; flipflopromney; fr; freerepublic; freerepublichistory; guncontrol; gungrabbers4romney; homosexualagenda; inman; jimrob; jimthompson; justsayno2romney; loserromney; megarinoromney; mexicans4romney; mitt; mitt4romney; mittbotsgetthezot; mittromney; mitttiedspot2car; mittwilltossyundrbus; moralabsolutes; msm4romney; nobama2012; nomorerinos; noromney2012; nrcc4romney; nrsc4romney; obama4romney; obamabeatmccainonce; obamacare; obamacare4romney; obamneycare; obaromney; panderingromney; poorsportromney; rinoromney; rnc4romney; romney; romney2lose; romney4establishment; romney4globalwarming; romney4himself; romney4leftists; romney4liberals; romney4marxism; romney4mccain; romney4obama; romney4obamacare; romney4progressives; romney4romney; romney4soros; romneyabortion; romneyalbatross; romneyaliar; romneyantifederalism; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; romneyantiteaparty; romneycare; romneydirtytrick; romneyexcuses; romneyfees; romneyfraud; romneyguncontrol; romneyisobamalite; romneyliar; romneylies; romneylovesobama; romneyprogressive; romneytaxes; romneythebackstabber; romneytheposer; romneytherino; romneytruthfile; ruinerromney; saynotomitt; shapeshifterromney; slickwillard; smallromney; soros4romney; stenchofromney; surfrinagwiass; teapartyantiromney; themagicrino; tokyoromney; twofaceromney; untrustworthyromney; verminromney; vichyrinoromney; vichyromney; votecain; weakfrontrunner; willardcare; zots4romneybots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 981-988 next last
To: NittanyLion

“More conservative Supreme Court nominees...”

Everyone says that GWB appointed soldly conservative justices. I say hogwash. I remember Harriet Miers. He only appointed conservatives because conservatives had him by the throat and were threatening open revolt.


181 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:22 PM PDT by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

Actually it is the Perry supporters who are the Romney supporters in disguise.

Who got in the race last after it was clear Romney was not going to get any appreciable support from social conservatives?

Who did the GOP Establishment push into the race after it seem Tea Party heroine Bachmann was going to upset Romney’s ride to the nomination?

Who does the GOP Establishment see as their back up card if Romney fails?

Who has long standing intimate ties with the Liberal wing of the GOP Establishment?

The answer is Rick Perry.

Bill Kristol to a NY Time Reporter telling him how the GOP Establishment plans to deal with “the Tea party mutiny”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2792217/posts?page=3

Kristol told me just after Perry entered the race, a development that essentially ended [the more radical Michele] Bachmann’s brief ascent. Establishment Republicans may prefer Romney to Perry, but their assumption is that either man can be counted on to steer the party back toward the broad center next fall, effectively disarming the Tea Party mutiny.

Wonder who Perry will be VP with?

Odd how that question never gets asked of Perry.

Could it be because everyone knows Perry is the GOP Establishment mole in the race to split the Tea Party/Conservative vote and hand the nomination to Romney?

Could it be because they know the ticket the GOP Machine is setting up is “Romney/Perry 2012? Think about it. Romney has the money, Perry has the idolatrous worship from the social Conservatives.

Could that be why the Perry camp is knowingly lying about Cain’s solidly Conservative record on both social and fiscal issues? Because they know full well Perry’s record can not stand close scrutiny?

What does anyone really know about Perry other then the nice words and platitudes he puts in his speeches? Looks like Perry is just Bush 3.0 another tough talking social conservative who will go to DC and be yet another good little GOP crony capitalist water boy.


182 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:22 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Marak

Couldn’t care less. No Romney!! Period!!


183 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:26 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Honestly though, if you vote “Other” when its Obama vs Romney, aren’t you essentially giving a vote for Obama? I’d rather have a guy I agree with 40% there than a guy I agree 4% on. I’ll vote for the best in the primary, but once that person is chosen its Anybody But Obama.


184 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:30 PM PDT by cdefreese
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The correct term is “liberal ill-logic”. :o)


185 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:34 PM PDT by Dr. White
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve

That’s EXACTLY it. Romney has pretty much peaked. He only wins the nomination if the vote is split.


186 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:34 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Marak; All
What happens when the eventual nominee picks Romney for VP?

Buy this stuff by the case:


But first? PRAY that such an ungodly event will not happen.
187 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:39 PM PDT by mkjessup (Herman Cain is a God fearin', Jesus-lovin', Constitution-revering PATRIOT. What's not to like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I do not see how any conservative can support him. I won’t.


188 posted on 10/15/2011 2:45:43 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
We’ve had a Republican majority in the White House with more appointees to the Supreme Court than dems. But what good has that done us?

The way I see it, a Democrat SCOTUS nominees rarely if ever end up ruling according to conservative principles. It's true that Republican SCOTUS nominees sometimes become a "Souter", but we other times become a Scalia / Thomas / Roberts / Alito.

189 posted on 10/15/2011 2:46:10 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Me either.


190 posted on 10/15/2011 2:46:30 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cdefreese

If you’re pushing Romney, you’re no conservative. Look at his damned record already!! Wake up and smell the RAT!!


191 posted on 10/15/2011 2:47:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I’m with you, 100%. No way will I vote Romney. Ditto on what made me pull the lever last election — the Hail Mary Pass McCain made with Palin.


192 posted on 10/15/2011 2:48:32 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("If Herman Cain does become President, his Vice President will be known as Co-Cain." -- Laz, 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Mr Jim, I wholeheartedly agree with you, and I could not have said it better. Romney represents the evil RINO side of the non-conservative part of the Republican Party, and is an establishment choice. Begone, we say, begone!


193 posted on 10/15/2011 2:49:02 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I won’t either. McCain was the last straw


194 posted on 10/15/2011 2:49:22 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Well. I should say I put some of the blame on the Republican establishment as well. They botched her MSM roll out as a VP candidate and then joined in on the Palin bashing. It was the worst electoral disaster in the Republican Party since....

Eisenhower not campaigning to help Nixon after the 1960 Republican convention


195 posted on 10/15/2011 2:49:36 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: cdefreese; Jim Robinson
I’d rather have a guy I agree with 40% there than a guy I agree 4% on.

Okay, YOU said this, NOW DEFEND IT.

WHAT 40% DO YOU AGREE WITH ROMNEY ABOUT?

196 posted on 10/15/2011 2:49:53 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("If Herman Cain does become President, his Vice President will be known as Co-Cain." -- Laz, 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
It is not a fact.

Romney is a social liberal to the core, fully aligned with his pro-abortion/pro-gay past.

Romney would appoint people like himself to the Supreme Court:

Republican social liberals.

You might as well just clone Queen Souter.

197 posted on 10/15/2011 2:50:11 PM PDT by Dr. White
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: CSI007

It is the Perry supporters who are the Romney supporters in disguise. The same collection of Bush bots have now become Perrybots.

Who got in the race last after it was clear Romney was not going to get any appreciable support from social conservatives?

Who did the GOP Establishment push into the race after it seem Tea Party heroine Bachmann was going to upset Romney’s ride to the nomination?

Who does the GOP Establishment see as their back up card if Romney fails?

Who has long standing intimate ties with the Liberal wing of the GOP Establishment?

The answer is Rick Perry.

Bill Kristol to a NY Time Reporter telling him how the GOP Establishment plans to deal with “the Tea party mutiny”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2792217/posts?page=3

Kristol told me just after Perry entered the race, a development that essentially ended [the more radical Michele] Bachmann’s brief ascent. Establishment Republicans may prefer Romney to Perry, but their assumption is that either man can be counted on to steer the party back toward the broad center next fall, effectively disarming the Tea Party mutiny.

Wonder who Perry will be VP with?

Odd how that question never gets asked of Perry.

Could it be because everyone knows Perry is the GOP Establishment mole in the race to split the Tea Party/Conservative vote and hand the nomination to Romney?

Could it be because they know the ticket the GOP Machine is setting up is “Romney/Perry 2012? Think about it. Romney has the money, Perry has the idolatrous worship from the social Conservatives.

Could that be why the Perry camp is knowingly lying about Cain’s solidly Conservative record on both social and fiscal issues? Because they know full well Perry’s record can not stand close scrutiny?

What does anyone really know about Perry other then the nice words and platitudes he puts in his speeches? Looks like Perry is just Bush 3.0 another tough talking social conservative who will go to DC and be yet another good little GOP crony capitalist water boy.


198 posted on 10/15/2011 2:50:14 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Dr. White
Please don’t use the racist terms “honkey” and “cracker”.

Again just in case you didn't get it:

I AM A HONKEY FOR HERMAN!

199 posted on 10/15/2011 2:51:17 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (Forget the Lawyers....firIn war, a seven year ost kill the journalists! - Die Ritter, die sagen, nee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Marak
What happens when the eventual nominee picks Romney for VP?

Why should that bug us? How important has Biden the Invisible been?

200 posted on 10/15/2011 2:51:36 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("If Herman Cain does become President, his Vice President will be known as Co-Cain." -- Laz, 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 981-988 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson