Wall Street Protesters March On Police

Reuters via Yahoo News ^ | 1 Oct 2011 | Ray Sanchez

[edpc]

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Protesters who have camped out near Wall Street for two weeks marched on Friday on police headquarters in Manhattan over what they viewed as a heavy-handed police response to a previous demonstration.

The Occupy Wall Street movement, whose members have vowed to stay through the winter, are protesting issues including the 2008 bank bailouts, foreclosures and high unemployment.

More than 1,000 people marched past City Hall and arrived at a plaza outside police headquarters in the late afternoon. Some held banners criticizing police, while others chanted: "We are the 99 percent" and "The banks got bailed out, we got sold out."

[God luvs America]

its the obama joker/socialist image...

[TigersEye]

However, at least they are seeking to do something about the international banks instead of those of use sitting on our lazy butts typings these posts...

An assumption on your part and a false assumption to boot.

[politicket]

Answer what questions? Those idiotic irrelevant and baseless questions you keep repeating here? None of those apply to me.

Nice try.

In other words, you have no answers to the questions I posed.

I notice how everyone likes to throw around "idiotic" this morning. Why don't you give me a little background on where the term "useful idiot" even came from...

I'm off to make a productive use of my day. I'll check back later this evening.

[TigersEye]

None of your questions apply to me. What part of that is too complicated for your little brain?

[politicket]

Are you saying you stand with these communist-organized protesters???

Did you ever see me write that?

I didn't think so.

They are protesting at the right location with the wrong message - and have every right to do it.

[TigersEye]

I bet my day will be more productive than yours and will advance my preparedness for whatever is to come more than yours will. :-)

[politicket]

Like your absurd comparisons? Taking children to church is comparable to taking a child to a confrontational protest and camping out in the streets and alleys in tents with no facilities for hygiene? It's always amusing to read the posts of morons.

It's always interesting to see how someone who cannot support their argument likes to resort to name-calling.

Taking children to church can be much worse than taking children to a Marxist protest to different people who may be in charge.

Hence the reason our founding fathers wrote the Constitution the way that they did.

Morals and right/wrong do not start with you, nor do they end with you.

[politicket]

I bet my day will be more productive than yours and will advance my preparedness for whatever is to come more than yours will. :-)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

That was rich...

Psst....you know what??? My dad is bigger than your dad...

With that childish exchange it's now off to work...

[TigersEye]

Taking children to church can be much worse than taking children to a Marxist protest to different people who may be in charge.

You have hoisted yourself on your own petard with that semi-coherent sentence. LMAO

[TigersEye]

Psst....you know what??? My dad is bigger than your dad... With that childish exchange it's now off to work...

You were the one who brought up the productiveness of your day as if it had some relevance to the conversation. Thank yourself for initiating the childish exchange.

[ETL]

Here's a pic I took of what looks to be the same guy I mentioned earlier. The event was a 2006 communist May Day/pro-illegal immigrant rally. Again, ANSWER Coalition is a Workers World Party front.

[ETL]

They are protesting at the right location with the wrong message - and have every right to do it.

And WE have every right to expose the Marxist-revolutionary SOBs for what they REALLY are and for what they really want! The liberal-leftist media won't ever do it.

[TigersEye]

They are protesting at the right location with the wrong message - and have every right to do it.

Who said they don't? I didn't. Name the posts that did.

{{{there will be crickets chirping on this one}}}

[cripplecreek]

How about if we call Social Services on all of the children that are being forced into church on Sundays by their parents?

So martyring one's children by exposing them to the elements and forcing them to live in the street for political goals is the same as sending them to church?

I think you're in the wrong place boy

[TigersEye]

Taking children to church can be much worse than taking children to a Marxist protest to different people who may be in charge.

Can anyone explain what the bolded part of that sentence means? (since the poster has rabbited from the thread) What different people? In charge of what?

[bray]

Those signs all look union made???

[cripplecreek]

I haven’t got a clue but I’ll happily explain my reasons for suggesting that child protective services take a look.

Just the other day I saw an interview with one of the idiots who was explaining how dedicated she was to destroying capitalism. To prove her dedication she had quit her part time job and given up her apartment and planned to live in the street til greedy capitalists are driven to their knees.

What struck me was the filthy toddler in her lap. She apparently feels so strongly that she was going to take her child from having a roof over its head and force the child to live in the street with her for her idiotic political jihad.

No rational person would do that to their child.

[TigersEye]

But in church the child would have to sit on a hard wooden bench for a whole hour! LOL

And then after the services, holy moly!, the ill-fated kid would have to endure having its cheeks pinched by overly affectionate matrons and offers of homemade baked goods and ... I can't go on, the horror of it is making me feint. (and hungry)

[cripplecreek]

I treat my dogs better than these marxists treat their children.

If I were a church going man, I would “inflict” that on them as well.

[CommieCutter]

I’m sure Dodd-Frank plays a big role in the reason credit is still frozen in this country.

I get the entire international banking theories. However, these people were mad about the bailouts etc. The bailouts were the problem of the Gov’t, the need for the bailouts were the problem of the Gov’t. Period. Forcing loans with Gov’t sponsorship, Gov’t backing is the fault of the Gov’t.

These people are destructive and are not helping reveal the real fraud.