Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Threatens to Sue ‘Rogue’ Book Publisher
abcnews.com ^ | Sept. 26, 2011 | Jon Karl & Shushannah walshe

Posted on 09/26/2011 3:53:55 PM PDT by Al B.

Sarah Palin’s family attorney John Tiemessen has written a letter to Maya Mavjee, the publisher of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, that Palin may sue her, the company, and the book’s author Joe McGinniss “for knowingly publishing false statements” in his book released last week, “The Rogue,” ABC News has learned.

READ THE ENTIRE LETTER HERE

The book was widely panned by critics for using unnamed sources to criticize Palin and her family. Tiemessen cites an email they have access to in which McGinniss writes that attorneys from Crown Publishing told him “nothing I can cite other than my own reporting rises above the level of tawdry gossip. The proof is always just around the corner, but that is a corner nobody has been able to turn” and that McGinniss “ran out of time” to sufficiently source the book.

A source close to the Palins tells ABC News that the “Palins are fighting back and demanding answers from Random House.”

“Random House is at the top of the food chain and published a book based upon acknowledged unsubstantiated gossip,” the source said. “The revealing email is key as evidence of this defamatory approach to politics through proxies.”

Tiemessen writes in the letter that the email “clearly describes the fact that Mr. McGinniss researched and investigated many false and scurrilous allegations, and concluded that there was absolutely no evidence anywhere backing these allegations.”

Palin’s attorney writes that it is “malicious” for Crown to publish the book when it has proof McGinniss and Crown “were fully aware the statements in the book were false, intended to be false, and were intended to harm.”

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: crownpublishing; crownpublishingfraud; defamationsuit; joemcginniss; libel; mcginniss; palin; palinhouse; palinpublishing; peepingjoe; randomhouse; randomhousefraud; sarahpalin; therogue; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: Al B.
Oh dear. This e-mail does destroy the "Absence of Malice" defense.

You can publish the truth, you can publish things you believe to be true, you can not publish bald face lies knowing that is what you are doing.

41 posted on 09/26/2011 4:21:35 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Can we ask questions which God finds unanswerable? Easily. All nonsense questions are unanswerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Well it’s about time she whacked the a-holes that have been lying about her for years.


42 posted on 09/26/2011 4:22:17 PM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

In the delusional parallel universe McGinnis lives in, he and his publishers probably figured that this book would be
a useful roadblock to a Palin run for the Presidency. I don’t know what advance he got, but I’m sure most of it is already halfway down the drain, if the reviews are any indication-—this tome has already provided a fool’s gold standard for shabbily dishonest, hyper-partisan Sleaze Reportage—it’s as if a 2 page tabloid article was inflated to 100 times the length and given the cache of hardcovers and a dustjacket to buy it respectability. It’s obviously an embarrassment to all concerned if he didn’t get a rousing welcome on, of all places, “The View”. Palin should sue and let the lawyers handle it, but not before a coherent statement is made that makes the most of just what
the partisan intentions were. They obviously thought there was a big enough audience for this book to finance it, and they were wrong about that. They may lose even more, or McGinnis may well lose his advance if a lawsuit is successful and defamation is proved. But Palin should not personally let this take up her time and focus.


43 posted on 09/26/2011 4:26:43 PM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

>well-worded nastigrams

LOL


44 posted on 09/26/2011 4:27:01 PM PDT by ROTB (Christian sin breeds enemies for the USA. If you're a Christian, stop sinning, and spread the Word..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Those emails DESTROY McGinnis..Thank you Andrew Breitbart for once again uncovering the REAL truth!!! Those emails absolutely prove that McGinnis had NOTHING and made the whole thing up, all of those lies he concocted right out of his ass. Your absolutely right, a person cannot write a book based on lies KNOWING they are lies. McGinnis knew these were lies and printed them anyway because he knew he had nothing but wanted something to bring down the Palins..but instead of Sarah being harmed by this book it will be McGinnis and Random House who will be brought down by these lies


45 posted on 09/26/2011 4:27:06 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

She’s threatening to sue and that’s what i believe is her intent - to threat which will make RH jump....pull the book off the shelves and prove that its a lie by their actions.

She is running for President


46 posted on 09/26/2011 4:27:55 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
"It is about time someone calls these Leftist publishing hacks out"

I'm sure you mean someone else.


47 posted on 09/26/2011 4:29:26 PM PDT by I see my hands (Keep your sunny side up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

This disturbs me in a vague sort of way. She can run for President, or she can sue the crap out of this scumbag, but I don’t think she can do both simultaneously.

If this letter results in a fast withdrawal of the book and an apology — something they are probably already thinking about in the aftermath of that smoking gun email, well and good. But I really want her to run for President and not get bogged down in a legal battle at this stage.

The book is already dead-in-water and sinking fast. No need to give it more attention than it deserves by appearing to take it seriously.


48 posted on 09/26/2011 4:29:58 PM PDT by Ronin (If we were serious about using the death penalty as a deterrent, we would bring back public hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
This is just a ROTFLMAO moment. It was one thing when the Libs were messing with a dirt poor Governor from Alaska.

As I posted before, I believe one of Governor Palin's motivations for stocking away the income was she was never going to be held financially hostage to anyone any more.

Game changed.

49 posted on 09/26/2011 4:31:30 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Because Sarah "quit," she now has enough resources that people who tell lies or file frivolous lawsuits against her will no longer get a free ride.

Sun Tzu taught her well.

"More Soldiers, Fight at Plain Less Soldiers, Fight in Forest"

We are in the "Fight at Plain" stage now.

50 posted on 09/26/2011 4:31:33 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Tweet:

Ohio4Sarah Ohio 4 Palin
by THIZDUDE_THINKZ
Levin: Letter from McCreepy waives all attorney privilege. They can be deposed. The controlling law would be Alaskan.

very interesting.


51 posted on 09/26/2011 4:32:59 PM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Go get ‘em, Sarah. Fight like a mama grizzly!!!


52 posted on 09/26/2011 4:33:30 PM PDT by Student0165
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
This disturbs me in a vague sort of way. She can run for President, or she can sue the crap out of this scumbag, but I don’t think she can do both simultaneously.

When she was governor, she would have had to. That's why she "quit."

She has acquired sufficient financial resources, in the meantime, that she doesn't have to do both.

The lawyers can take care of business, while she takes care of business.

53 posted on 09/26/2011 4:33:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Which raises the question, how did Breitbart get those emails? And the bigger question, for the really paranoid, is why did McGinniss make such childish mistake? Why would he provide a textbook perfect solution to the NYT Malice problem for public figures? Is it a trap? Enquiring minds want to know ...


54 posted on 09/26/2011 4:35:12 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Tiemessen writes in the letter that the email “clearly describes the fact that Mr. McGinniss researched and investigated many false and scurrilous allegations, and concluded that there was absolutely no evidence anywhere backing these allegations.”

I'm continually amazed that so many people will put potentially incriminating information in emails.

55 posted on 09/26/2011 4:36:20 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot
If you're suing in response to an act for which some redress is possible, the courts look askance if you aren't sincere enough to ask for redress before trying to shake the court system for money. And when you're planning to sue, the well-worded nastigrams you sent along the way can be so quotable in court, and frightening to the bad guys.

Indeed. In the last sentence of the letter, Tiemessen says:

Please do not hesitate to call if you have questions or concerns or if you wish to resolve this dispute.

The ball is in their court to propose a remedy that will alleviate the need to actually file suit. As in chess, "Check."

56 posted on 09/26/2011 4:37:06 PM PDT by CedarDave (My Sarah prediction: Announcing for President between October 18 and 28.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

In addition to him being an ignoramus, Old Sloppy Joe wasn’t to bright when he admitted he wrote the email.


57 posted on 09/26/2011 4:37:13 PM PDT by HalfFull ("Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" -PHenry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

Well by someone else, that would mean that there were others who went after these jerks. This is the first time I can recall one of our guys hitting back hard over this stuff. The other book that should have been challenged is that Mark Halpren fantasy book he tried to peddle as the truth. Game Change.


58 posted on 09/26/2011 4:37:17 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Well, in order for a public figure to sue for libel, the person has to prove “actual malice.”

Normally, that’s very difficult to do, but not in this case.

I’m an Alaskan, and the other book about Alaska written by McGinnis, “Going to Extremes,” was pure crap. The scenes that supposedly took place in the towns where I lived seemed to be based on fantasy and rumor. I can either believe his words or my own eyes.

My fervent hope is that Palin’s lawyers chew him up and turn him into bait. Not that a fish with any respect would bite on it.


59 posted on 09/26/2011 4:40:03 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

Yep, the lawyer’s letter states it. See Post #37


60 posted on 09/26/2011 4:41:09 PM PDT by BreitbartSentMe (ATLAS SHRUGGED was supposed to be a warning, NOT a newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson