Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney, a safe choice for risky times (the reassuring center)
Washington Post ^ | September 19, 2011 | Michael Gerson

Posted on 09/20/2011 5:05:28 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Many Americans are still picking through the wreckage of overturned mortgages and lost jobs, trying to rescue old pictures of their middle-class aspirations. But another economic tropical storm is now being tracked.

[snip]

Few believe that President Obama would be able to rally the world during a euro zone crisis, especially since he is increasingly irrelevant to the politics of his own country. His American Jobs Act — combining minimal ambition and minimal creativity — was greeted with bipartisan skepticism. Obama has repeatedly demanded that Congress “act now.” In response, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) has effectively told the president to get in line for the Senate’s “next work period” in October.

In this atmosphere of mounting challenge and diminished leadership, economists have lowered their predictions of future economic growth and now see a 1-in-3 chance that America will slip back into recession during the next 12 months.

With the arrival of a second economic crisis, America would enter a new phase. Our politics would pass beyond Tea Party anger toward a more generalized economic fear — the fear of durable stagnation and national decline. And this raises a large political question: Would an economic crisis favor a revolutionary candidate or a reassuring candidate?

In Rick Perry and Mitt Romney, we have undiluted representatives of each type. Perry is purposely provocative in style and content. He questions the legitimacy of 70 years of federal entitlement commitments. He proposes a fundamental reordering of the relationship between the federal government and the states. He is highly critical of the Federal Reserve and its chairman. Perry’s specific economic policies remain defiantly unspecific, but his rhetoric and intentions are ideologically ambitious.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; economy; mormon; perry2012; slickmitt; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Center of what?


21 posted on 09/20/2011 5:45:51 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Nazi-state ... lol. Yeah, that Texas sure is the next coming of the Reich....


22 posted on 09/20/2011 5:52:07 AM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; RoosterRedux; jonrick46; deepbluesea; RockinRight; TexMom7; potlatch; ...
Perry Ping....

IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.

IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.

23 posted on 09/20/2011 5:56:27 AM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
McCain did it for me. I am done doing it. Either it is a decent candidate or I simply will pass.


24 posted on 09/20/2011 5:59:32 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Keep this image in mind from now to the Republican Primary. Mittens and his buddies, Teddy and the demorat gang, celebrating Mitten's signing of Romneycare.
25 posted on 09/20/2011 5:59:34 AM PDT by CharlesMartelsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
There are two possible reasons for Bachmann to be helping Romney. 1.) She probably realizes she needs him for any possible way to defeat Perry at the Iowa caucus and the Iowa caucus is her last stand.

If she helps Romney get the nomination, there is probably something in it for her. Romney is paying off Pawlenty's debt. Romney needs Bachmann as much as Bachmann needs Romney. They both are sellouts.

26 posted on 09/20/2011 6:07:20 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Center of Perry and Obama. Now, if we only had someone on the Right to support...


27 posted on 09/20/2011 6:08:04 AM PDT by Ingtar (Together we go broke (from a Pookie18 post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

No amount of drugs or alcohol will induce me to vote for Romney.


28 posted on 09/20/2011 6:10:13 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bbernard
That tells me that if they can’t have BO they would like to someone who tries to play both sides of the fence.

Liberals admire Mitt for his supple spine.


29 posted on 09/20/2011 6:14:33 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Mitt Romney: pretending to be a Republican.


30 posted on 09/20/2011 6:16:48 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Mitt Romney—and Perry—safe votes for demrats.


31 posted on 09/20/2011 6:18:57 AM PDT by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It’s the Democrats’ Plan C.

If Obama cannot get re-elected, and if neither Hillary nor anyone else wants to take him on for Plan B, manipulate the GOP into nominating Romney. Then have Obama spend is remaining time in office pushing us as far and as fast to the left as possible, confident in the knowledge that Mitt will do little if anything to reverse it.


32 posted on 09/20/2011 6:19:47 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

33 posted on 09/20/2011 6:22:21 AM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

Last time we went “safe” we lost to a moron. Not THIS time!


34 posted on 09/20/2011 6:23:30 AM PDT by luvie (zero IS a Fonzi Scheme!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma; Cincinatus' Wife

>>> There are two possible reasons for Bachmann to be helping Romney...

Other then each has a common need to knock Perry down to have a shot at the nomination I am not seeing the coordination you imply. In any event I referenced the supporters on their own fading away from Bachmann and towards Romney. If she told them to do this I haven’t heard of it.

As illustrated by the Bachmann supporter exodus Romney as the great bogeyman doesn’t seem to exist outside a narrow and probably not particularly vital slice of the tea party. As best I can see it for those who get most hysterical over Romney, they only have the Perry option. Anything else they do is a vote for Romney, either directly or indirectly. Not that this has generally sunk in yet.


35 posted on 09/20/2011 6:29:22 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Bachmann attacks Perry—not Romney. It is clear she would rather harm Perry.


36 posted on 09/20/2011 6:35:03 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Note to Washington Post, you are NOT the center. The Tea Party is the center. You people at the Post are way over on the Left.


37 posted on 09/20/2011 9:13:02 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Romney is Bush-lite, and I mean George H.W. Bush, the New England patrician who keeps an apartment in Houston so he can avoid paying state income tax. Bush went pro-life to get the VP slot, but I doubt he meant it. That’s why his wife, daughter-in-law, and grandchildren are out there proclaiming that they are pro-choice, pro-gay, and whatever else the upper crust is for, and hinting broadly that their menfolk are just pretending to go along with the yahoos in the Pro-life movement. But our family is on the right side in the cultural wars.


38 posted on 09/20/2011 10:55:45 AM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Perry takes votes away from her. Romney does not.


39 posted on 09/20/2011 10:57:23 AM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CharlesMartelsGhost

Obamacare / Romneycare -- both yucking it up for screwing over their constituents.

40 posted on 09/20/2011 11:07:22 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. - Prov 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson