Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Death of the Sarah Palin Campaign Has Been Greatly Exaggerated
September 17, 2011 | SamAdams76

Posted on 09/17/2011 1:03:44 PM PDT by SamAdams76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241 next last
To: SamAdams76
I have no doubt that Palin will get into this thing and when she does, we just might be able to secure a massive mandates a year from November and get ourselves out of the mess that we are in.

I look forward to that.

I currently support Rick Perry, and would welcome the opportunity to support Sarah Palin were she to become an announced candidate. I've said many times that I thought the two would make a fine General Election ticket. I've called them my dream team.

In keeping with your correct assertion that we should not now annoint Mitt Romney or Rick Perry, but look to more conservative candidates such as Santorum, Cain, or Bachmann, that certainly must apply to Sarah as well. Let's not annoint anyone until we've seen the primary process play out over the coming months.

This doesn't mean we shouldn't advocate for a particular candidate if we are so inclined, and it would be in the best interests of Free Republic to do so in a spirit of civility and good cheer.

And may the best man or woman win! :)

41 posted on 09/17/2011 1:35:52 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
"I suppose the one justifiable question all ask, at one time or another, is why? Why wait soooooo long?"


One possible reason is $$$. The speculation and drama generates a lot of it. Another is the possibility that she craves the attention of the spotlight.
42 posted on 09/17/2011 1:36:32 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Palin has heard the fat lady sing.


43 posted on 09/17/2011 1:36:32 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Congress doesn't care a damn about "we the people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

She is a buffoon? Where did that come from?


44 posted on 09/17/2011 1:37:47 PM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Every time you post this, I smile. Thank you.


45 posted on 09/17/2011 1:38:20 PM PDT by HotKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown
Actually, it is a cat and mouse game.

LOL!!! BINGO!

It's a deadly serious high-stakes game. And I think of Bette Davis in "All About Eve" -- "Not mouse. Never mouse. If anything, rat."

46 posted on 09/17/2011 1:38:28 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar; SamAdams76
That’s an awful lot of words to say something that could be said in a few.

SamAdams76 never misses an opportunity to type up a nine-mile long wall of text. It's just Sam being Sam.

47 posted on 09/17/2011 1:38:40 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76; freedumb2003; Clara Lou; RitaOK; Sacajaweau
The ship has sailed. And Gov. Palin, contrary to the beliefs of her acolytes, cannot walk on water.

I wouldn't vote for Palin now if you paid me. This isn'r a cat and mouse game.

Until she declares, I don’t see the need for discussion of the topic.

Sarah has become a caracature of herself and painfully buffoonery is not now too far off. -rita

Spiro Agnew is attributed to speaking the phrase "nattering nabobs of negativism". It was written for him by his speechwriter, Bill Safire. I think we have a choir full!

I laugh every time I see these statements from the PDSers, herein. There may be less than air among their brains, or less than honor within their breasts.

Most importantly, they are unimportant, except to themselves. I seriously doubt Sarah Palin would consider their advice. I doubt that they would seem more than buzzing nuisances. Let it suffice, that they always repeat the same canards, begging for attention.

My personal goal is to raise lots of money for SarahPac. I have amassed and/or contributed much already. I see Sarah Palin as an opportunity for restoration, should she become our President. She has already proven her value to the Conservative movement and the TEA Party. She is always on message, seeking to destabilize this present administration, and bring attention to the problems he is causing, not to herself. She is a PATRIOT, first.

There is no doubt in my mind she is running...


Click to learn more about her...

Elect Sarah Palin for President 2012

Re-Elect President Sarah Palin 2016

48 posted on 09/17/2011 1:39:01 PM PDT by WVKayaker (The GOP needs to live the planks of its platform, not just offer lip service. -Sarah Palin 8/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vicar7

Primaries are a different animal from the general election. It’s when there’s usually not a great deal separating the candidates, so the emphasis thru the primaries is on those differences, not the big picture. I think all of them (save Ron Paul) could properly identify the actual enemy.


49 posted on 09/17/2011 1:41:52 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Thoughtful comments on your part but I disagree that there is total silence from Palin. She gave two speeches over Labor Day weekend in both Iowa and New Hampshire and those were political speeches that you would only expect a candidate to give. She posts articles on a regular basis on subjects that you would expect a candidate to expound on. There are PACs raising money on her behalf and some semblance of a ground operation being put together.

Why so long? Well I just got done posting here that at this point in the election cycle, neither Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan or Richard Nixon (1968) has announced. And all three did get elected (and then re-elected).

My guess on the wait would probably be that Palin already has the name recognition, has a couple books out, so immediately upon entry, she'd be an instant contender so why the rush? Also, she might be waiting for the current field to settle out a little and maybe she was hoping more would have dropped out of the race by now besides just Pawlenty.

50 posted on 09/17/2011 1:43:00 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (All my replies get posted to AttackWatch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
I truly hadn't decided but I certainly will/would, of course, vote Republican.

When Perry came on board, I felt I had a choice that I really liked.

Never really took Palin seriously. And like I've recently concluded: she's running for s media job...not the Presidency.

51 posted on 09/17/2011 1:44:56 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clairity

If what you say is true - is the “reality” - then why doesn’t she announce that she’s NOT running? Why keep up the speculation?


52 posted on 09/17/2011 1:46:33 PM PDT by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Matt Hatter; ASA Vet; Admin Moderator
How many times are you going to post this? It is SPAM. A great majority of the posters in her qualify for president, so what!

I for one appreciate ASA Vete's constant reminder and lovely photo (a variety in rotation, apparently) accompanying it that are always present on these threads. It's short and sweet and if you've seen it before (as most of us have many times!) it's fast and simple to scroll past, unlike REAL spam on FR that practically takes up several square feet of screen space, takes up to a minute or more of pure annoyance to scroll past, and which its abusers post many times to the same thread. On the otherhandm, ASA Vet's "spam," as you call it, is like a rose, a pleasant little extra, IMO.

ASA Vet, from me, I say, keep up the good work and THANK YOU. It's "spam" I don't mind seeing one bit, and I appreciate that you limit it to one per thread.

53 posted on 09/17/2011 1:47:50 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

Have you read her books? or watched “The Undefeated”? You are very INCORRECT in your assessment. Educate yourself and then do your assessment.


54 posted on 09/17/2011 1:48:21 PM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Good thing you didn’t have any spelling errors!!!


55 posted on 09/17/2011 1:49:19 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
That’s an awful lot of words to say something that could be said in a few.

Don't you know I get paid by the word?

56 posted on 09/17/2011 1:49:50 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (All my replies get posted to AttackWatch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Matt Hatter

Ur a cheap suit...

But hey cheap suits look good with a bowtie!


57 posted on 09/17/2011 1:49:57 PM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
Anyone But Obama.

Word is McCain is thinking about running. Santorum is already in...NO MORE RINOS! My efforts will go elsewhere.

The republicans in general, and here in Pittsburgh the Hillmans whom my family was involved with politically, have been hugely disappointing to me.

They really think that they can threaten or toss me a bone and move on.

NO MORE.

Every election is played as " the most important to our country in our lifetime" by those folks. I want to work to make the elections AFTER 2012 - 2016 not as important.

I also understand your sentiment and don't mean to sound confrontational. It's all just discussion at this point.

58 posted on 09/17/2011 1:52:19 PM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts bolt The Constitution together as the loose screws of the Left fall out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Matt Hatter

Where I come from its called Brown-Nosing.


59 posted on 09/17/2011 1:52:31 PM PDT by dusttoyou (paulnutz/bachnutz/palinwishers are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I think all of them (save Ron Paul) could properly identify the actual enemy.

Only Newt correctly and continuously identifies the enemy that I have seen.

The rest provide fodder that could eventually give aid and comfort to him.

Debates are for watching folks implode rather than state their case.

It is also important to know so far most folks are not engaged in watching debates.

When Sarah hits Iowa running all bets are off. She will be positive, and positively know her enemy and call him out for the fraud he is.

Folks for some reason cannot nor will not stop watching Sarah then.


60 posted on 09/17/2011 1:55:27 PM PDT by vicar7 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson