Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vicar7

Primaries are a different animal from the general election. It’s when there’s usually not a great deal separating the candidates, so the emphasis thru the primaries is on those differences, not the big picture. I think all of them (save Ron Paul) could properly identify the actual enemy.


49 posted on 09/17/2011 1:41:52 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

I think all of them (save Ron Paul) could properly identify the actual enemy.

Only Newt correctly and continuously identifies the enemy that I have seen.

The rest provide fodder that could eventually give aid and comfort to him.

Debates are for watching folks implode rather than state their case.

It is also important to know so far most folks are not engaged in watching debates.

When Sarah hits Iowa running all bets are off. She will be positive, and positively know her enemy and call him out for the fraud he is.

Folks for some reason cannot nor will not stop watching Sarah then.


60 posted on 09/17/2011 1:55:27 PM PDT by vicar7 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson