Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/14/2011 11:42:49 AM PDT by mk2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: mk2000

Yeah, they need taxes to support the $3000 a month raise they just voted themselves!


2 posted on 09/14/2011 11:45:42 AM PDT by Paperdoll (NO MORE RINOs (BUSHS)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

We have never kept all of our money unless you go back a few hundred years. It’s not because we don’t deserve to. It’s because we believe a certain amount of government is a good idea.


3 posted on 09/14/2011 11:47:32 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

where is that damn face-palm graphic when ya need it...??


4 posted on 09/14/2011 11:47:49 AM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
Lately I've been hearing an awful lot of media people say that the rich "need to pay their fair share".

I'd like to know what a "fair share" is.
I'd like to know who determines that.
I'd like to know why one workers deserves to keep what he earns, and other worker "doesn't deserve" to keep that much.
I've seen the amount of tax revenue which is squeezed out of the top 5% of earners, and I've seen that 47% of the people pay no taxes. I'm not understanding how "fair" this is.

It's the art of picking Winners and losers. It's Favoritism. It's government as a way of rewarding friends and punishing enemies.

It's not American.

5 posted on 09/14/2011 11:49:13 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Asshat......


7 posted on 09/14/2011 11:51:23 AM PDT by Man from Oz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Bump


9 posted on 09/14/2011 11:52:32 AM PDT by lowbridge (Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
Schakowsky is just plain ignorant. Federal spending doubled in the last decade. We now have about 50% who pay no federal income tax. I pay plenty of tax. These looters are in it to buy votes and line their pockets.
10 posted on 09/14/2011 11:53:32 AM PDT by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

This guy would be a real hit at the next TEA Party event.


11 posted on 09/14/2011 11:54:37 AM PDT by Recon Dad ("Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

When you consider socialism, do not fool yourself about its nature. Remember, that there is no such dichotomy as ‘human rights’ versus ‘property rights.’ No human rights can exist without property rights. Since material goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and are needed to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result of his effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to turn men into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the ‘right’ to ‘redistribute’ the wealth produced by others is claiming the ‘right’ to treat human beings as chattel. - Ayn Rand”

FUBO
FUDP


12 posted on 09/14/2011 11:59:18 AM PDT by tumblindice (Governor Rick Perry: "No border fence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
And there are many things that we decide to do together like have our national security. Like have police and fire.

When youre unemployed, the rest dont mean shit. Without a job, youre nothing.

18 posted on 09/14/2011 12:11:54 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

The KEY MORAL QUESTION here is:

“It’s fine for people to believe THEY are their brother’s keeper and there’s plenty of people who DO take care of each other charitably in the USA, BUT DOES THE GOV’T HAVE THE RIGHT TO FORCE PEOPLE TO BE THEIR BROTHER’S KEEPER???”

I say no because that’s against the 13th Amendment (It’s INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE!):

AMENDMENT XIII

Passed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865.

Note: A portion of Article IV, section 2, of the Constitution was superseded by the 13th amendment.

Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


19 posted on 09/14/2011 12:12:27 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

No American taxpeyer should keep “all” of their money and I do not believe that anyone is arguing that they should. Even if we were able to restrain fedzilla back under it’s constitutional bounds, there would STILL be a certain level of government that needed to be paid for.

Flat or fair tax now.


20 posted on 09/14/2011 12:12:31 PM PDT by Grunthor (Perry, Cain, Santorum, Gingrich, Romney, Bachmann Pretty much in that order for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
Taxes are not supposed to support "the society".

The purpose of taxes is to fund the government. Federal taxes to fund the federal government. State taxes to support the state government. The people are supposed to support themselves. Businesses are supposed to support themselves. Got it?

21 posted on 09/14/2011 12:13:31 PM PDT by Rapscallion (The majority of democrats (50%+) pay no income taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Anyone with a job doesn’t deserve to keep their money.


22 posted on 09/14/2011 12:13:32 PM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
What about the people that work at the National Institute of Health who are looking for a cure for cancer,” Schakowsky said.

Ummmmm.... they don't deserve to keep all THEIR money either??

23 posted on 09/14/2011 12:14:06 PM PDT by WayneS (Don't Blame Me, I voted for Kodos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

“Schakowsky also says one reason the 2009 stimulus bill did not succeed was because it was not large enough.”

Yes, and communism didn’t work because it was not done right.

Liberalism in a nutshell.


24 posted on 09/14/2011 12:23:57 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
"What about the people that work at the National Institute of Health who are looking for a cure for cancer,”

Hey Schakowsky, we were already given a person who had the cure for cancer ...

... But she was aborted in 1977.

30 posted on 09/14/2011 1:01:51 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Democrats: the Party of NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Another communist be*tch.


31 posted on 09/14/2011 1:07:01 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Rabid democRATS and 0bama the dictator own it all now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Wait...is this the same woman whose husband had some ... Erm... Problems with bank fraud and tax evasion???


36 posted on 09/14/2011 3:46:31 PM PDT by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Time to get rid of this MFer


38 posted on 09/14/2011 5:38:28 PM PDT by wetgundog (" Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is no Vice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson