Posted on 09/06/2011 5:50:42 PM PDT by AAABEST
HOUSTON -- At the moment, Rick Perry's camp confirms the governor still plans to participate in Wednesday night's GOP debate in California.
The governor's campaign just released his schedule showing two events in California after the debate. It appears he will leave the wildfires to appear Wednesday night in California and will continue on with planned fundraisers Thursday and Friday. It appears his brief break from campaigning hasn't hurt.
(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...
What's really interesting is this tone and tactic you're all singing is the same tune across the threads....the same tactic media and liberals use to take down their opponets. It's not appealing seeing it here on Fr.....what it will do is chase people off from Free Republic if crap like this continues.
It’s a terrible situation and I hope everybody comes through ok. I wonder how much of this is due to inadequate forestry management?
Hi...I doubt much of it has to do with that...moreso the environmentalists who won’t allow “safe” burns to clear the rubble out...thus preventing flash flames and the like. Forest management has been crying out for years if this isn’t done safely by controlled burns then when fires do it they will be hurrendous beasts of a fire.
That’s what I’m referring to, the environmentalists.
About ten years ago, a quarter of my province went up in smoke, thanks to their protests against controlled burns. Fortunately, much of the fires were in fairly remote locations, so not much loss in property or lives.
No, what it does is make the person think twice about unflinchingly believing anything that comes out of the camp that does it. It then makes the person more open to learning about other candidates.
You should look at the posts from Tempest. It’s at the point where he, quite literally, does not make any sense.
I really think you ought to take a look at what 'editor-surveyor' wrote in posts 102, 103, 104, 108, 111, amd 113 before you start saying the pot is black.
“Palin just gave advice for GOPer to not trash its candidates.”
If so, I applaud her. I honors Reagan’s 11th Commandment, which freepers has told me several times means nothing.
Again, I applaud her for this.
Most Perry supporters actually like Sarah Palin as a conservative leader. Unfortunately, like Paul supporters, many of her supporters (not all but many) are a turn-off. Many of them are actually responsible for chasing former Palin supporters off the field and into Perry's field.There is a gnat-swarm of Perry-haters (10-20) some of whom openly claim to be Palin supporters, like editor-surveyor, and some who never reveal their candidate. Those, like editor-surveyor, who are part of the gnat-swarm of mean, nasty, ugly contentless posters, who swarm every Perry thread with their constant, repetitious meaningless posts, are actually far worse than the average Paulbot, who tends to stay mainly on Ron Paul threads and tends to TALK ABOUT THEIR OWN CANDIDATE, rather than be in 24/7 attack mode.
The gnat-swarm never posts positively about anything and always, always attacks Perry. Those among them who CLAIM to support Palin (which I am starting to doubt, at least for some of them) are doing her a BIG disservice (which might actually be their goal in the first place).
Why? According to the way many people here seem to think lately, as a former Democrat and union boss, Reagan was a RINO and therefore not worthy of respect.
Oh, please. These lowlifes play the victim after spending months mercilessly repeating inane talking points and trashing Sarah Palin.
And then it's someone elses fault that they pick a candidate with a shocking record and put their fingers in their ears screaming "LA LA LA LA LA" whenever anyone points it out.
Wake up and smell what you're shoveling.
Well that is an 'undeclared' point since there's nothing 'official' stating there were only going to be two candidates in this first debate...
...further... making it appear that this one debate will decide the fate of the primary election is foolish at best.
Romney has already been fully vetted and already has all the money he needs and is too cautious to implode. So if you succeed in mortally wounding Perry, you will just be handing the nomination to Romney, and nothing you can say or do with keep Romney from getting the nomination then.
Once you realize that Romney was going to get the nomination easy, you will see Perry as I do, as the man who saved us from Romney. Prior to Perry's entry into the race all the other candidates also knew Romney was going to win judging how debate after debate they never went after him and in fact went out of their way not to attack him. They are all running for vice president and they know it.
“She flew up there for an hour, got a couple of pictures taken and returned to screwing us.”
But a couple of days ago I was told off in no uncertain terms that Perry NEEDED to be in Texas for this emergency. LOL
The Feds have taken over the fire fighting command, (at least in the Bastrop fire) turning local volenteers away.
Perry can coordinate from a far if necessary.
Only one problem with your theory??? Gov Sarah Palin is going to wipe the floor with both of them
I know....I was providing him cover just in case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.