Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Conquering the Storm
Facebook ^ | 8/8/11 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 08/08/2011 4:20:47 PM PDT by Lou Budvis

In the coming days we’ll sort through the repercussions of S&P’s downgrade of our credit rating, including concerns about the impact a potential interest rate increase would have on our ability to service our suffocating $14.5 trillion debt.

I’m surprised that so many people seem surprised by S&P’s decision. Weren’t people paying attention over the last year or so when we were getting warning after warning from various credit rating agencies that this was coming? I’ve been writing and speaking about it myself for quite some time.

(Excerpt) Read more at facebook.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 45thuspresident; anewbeginning; buildrefineries; chicongo; commonsense; creditrating; debt; demsworstfear; domesticnaturalgas; downgrade; drillheredrillnow; maybealittleblow; obama; obamaa; obamadowngrade; onthedownlow; palin; repealobamacare; sarahpalin; sp; standardandpoors; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last
To: CincyRichieRich; All

also posted on http://antimullah.com with Rome burning graphic.


101 posted on 08/08/2011 7:13:51 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
Ryan's plan was a "cut" from the baseline budget of 6.2 trillion over the next ten years. Many of us strongly criticized it here on discussion threads about it.

The debate and criticisms regarding the merits of the Ryan plan, or baseline budgeting is not the issue. You accused Palin of being unserious and unspecific about entitlement reform. The Ryan plan does in fact include a serious and specific plan on the issue of entitlement reform. Heck, the Medicare voucher program contained in the plan in and of itself clearly qualifies as a legit example of "serious entitlement reform".

102 posted on 08/08/2011 7:21:51 PM PDT by AHerald ("Do not fear, only believe." - Mark 5:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

LOL!


103 posted on 08/08/2011 7:21:56 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

I will say it again : Perry and Bachmann couldn't sit down together and make as much sense as Palin. They could even bring in Mitt to help. Bachmann would have slogans and Perry would hold a prayer meeting and Mitt would advise caution.


104 posted on 08/08/2011 7:23:42 PM PDT by RED SOUTH (If you liked George W. Bush, you will LOVE Rick Perry! Follow me on twitter @redsouth72)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Actually, I thought Paul Ryan has been talking about getting RID of Baseline Budgeting.


105 posted on 08/08/2011 7:24:02 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH
"I will say it again :"

When shouting just isn't enough... repeat.

106 posted on 08/08/2011 7:28:03 PM PDT by BuddhaBrown (Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBrown
I will say it again :" When shouting just isn't enough... repeat.

And when noone knows you are an idiot , post somthing to prove it.


107 posted on 08/08/2011 7:30:32 PM PDT by RED SOUTH (If you liked George W. Bush, you will LOVE Rick Perry! Follow me on twitter @redsouth72)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

LOL... well said.


108 posted on 08/08/2011 7:30:55 PM PDT by Gator113 (Palin 2012, period.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AHerald
You accused Palin of being unserious and unspecific about entitlement reform.

I did, and another Palin supporter stated that she said that Ryan's plan was a "starting point" which again makes it nebulous.

Look, you guys wouldn't take platitudes without concrete numbers from any body else, and rightfully so. But because you like her personally you'll gloss over imperfections.

I don't like her, I don't like Perry, or Romney, or Paul or Bachmann or anybody else. I don't know these people from Adam or Eve. They're not my family, they're not my friends, I've never had dinner with any of them, and they've never done anything personally for me.

I save my like for people in my life. Can you political supporters of any candidate, potential candidate or office holder grasp that?

I just consider it prudent conservatism to be skeptical of those seeking power and to criticize them relentlessly. If they know they have a base of support regardless that only makes it easier to betray. Haven't we learned our lesson with the Bushbots and Obamatons?

Even George Washington was savaged, often by other founders. That's what your supposed to have in a constitutional republic. You want to be on top, you better expect some of us to kick that ladder.

109 posted on 08/08/2011 7:37:03 PM PDT by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Palin has on many occasions spoke about fixing our system on a variety of levels. That’s a fact. Are you wrong to question a politico? Not wrong, but this is well trodden ground. Why not take a trip down archive lane before questioning that which has been answered repeatedly?

No, SP shouldn’t get any more of a pass than Obama. But she, more than any other, has NOT gotten any passes of any sort.


110 posted on 08/08/2011 7:44:52 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH
boldly clever.
111 posted on 08/08/2011 7:52:18 PM PDT by BuddhaBrown (Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Palin has on many occasions spoke about fixing our system on a variety of levels.

I've read them. I really have. And I've seen no numbers. This isn't a freakin' game anymore. It's not 1974 where we have 40 years.

Do you see what's going on out there. Can you grasp the math. 10,000 boomers going on the dole a day. 100 trillion in unfunded liabilities.

It really, absolutely is crunch time, where someone has to say "hey, you on SS, you get 2300 a month , next year it has to be 1850 or the whole damn thing comes down".

"Hey you, on Medicare, next year 10,000 in deductibles or America ceases to exist as you know it."

"Hey you on food stamps, I'm real sorry but 25% off the top starting next month or we're doomed".

That's where we're at. About 11:59 from riots in the streets.

Wish it wasn't, but it is.

And I don't see any politician that can save us. I don't even think politics really can at this point.

But I'm still going to demand it til the bitter end, damnit.

112 posted on 08/08/2011 7:57:18 PM PDT by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
I just consider it prudent conservatism to be skeptical of those seeking power and to criticize them relentlessly. If they know they have a base of support regardless that only makes it easier to betray. Haven't we learned our lesson with the Bushbots and Obamatons?

Even George Washington was savaged, often by other founders. That's what your supposed to have in a constitutional republic. You want to be on top, you better expect some of us to kick that ladder.

Thanks for the nice discourse on the need for prudent skepticism of politicians in a healthy democracy ... What that has to do our specific debate regarding the validity of your specific claim that Palin wasn't serious about entitlement reform escapes me.

113 posted on 08/08/2011 7:58:59 PM PDT by AHerald ("Do not fear, only believe." - Mark 5:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Thanks for posting it all. I clicked on the link and it told me to sign up for Facebook, which I refuse to do


You don't need a Facebook account, try this:

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150260905388435

... and for all of her notes:

http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin?sk=notes

114 posted on 08/08/2011 8:05:00 PM PDT by Quicksilver (Independent conservatives will restore America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rintense

I guess too late would be after the first Iowa caucus. Anytime before that, and I’m on board.


115 posted on 08/08/2011 8:05:18 PM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/Perry or Palin/Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
It's Liberty vs tyranny.

That's the bottom line.

Palin is the best hope to lead us back to Liberty!

(I think restoration begins at Waukee, Iowa. Sept. 3rd 2011).

116 posted on 08/08/2011 8:07:01 PM PDT by MountainDad (Support your local Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

I’m with you, it IS crunch time. But until she or any other Pol gets in there it’s all just words. I don’t know if she can ‘fix’ it or not. It may well be a bridge too far. But IMO she has already convinced me that the direction she’s headed is the one I want to go and technically she isn’t even in the ‘game’ yet. No one else has come close to providing that ‘direction’ as she has.

Bottom line IMO is that you, I and many on FR are ready for that kind of reality talk. ‘we’ know thats what’s needed. But the gen pub isn’t and like it or not (and no, I don’t), they have to be eased into it. They aren’t going to abandon their vision of reality overnight, even in light of the disaster coming down around their ears.


117 posted on 08/08/2011 8:08:52 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: AHerald

I thought Ryan’s plan was good on the social security and medicare issue. It wouldn’t solve the problem immediately, but that problem cannot be solved immediately. It would have protected those 55 and older who have counted on those plans and those who are already receiving benefits.

Possibly the age could be increased to 57 1/2 or 58 but not much.

It is a realistic plan and would eventually solve this problem which no one else seems to want to tackle at all.

And I think Palin gets it completely. Some people here are focusing on semantics but what good difference does it make what exact words you use if you’re a liar like Obama or someone who bounces in the wind like Romney.


118 posted on 08/08/2011 8:12:37 PM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/Perry or Palin/Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

“post the whole thing...there is no copyright”

Actually, there is. Every original work has an inherent copyright, even if it isn’t registered.


119 posted on 08/08/2011 8:18:41 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner (Seek you first the kingdom of God, and all things will be given to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

However, this is well covered by the “Fair Use” clause of the copyright law.


120 posted on 08/08/2011 8:19:33 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner (Seek you first the kingdom of God, and all things will be given to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson