Posted on 07/25/2011 6:14:11 PM PDT by SkyPilot
What a first lady, a chain store and others are doing to try to make fresh fruits and vegetables more available in poor communities.
Nothings ever as simple as wed like it to be. A case in point: Policies that simply increase access to supermarkets may not get people to choose an apple over ice cream, a recent study reported.
Changing peoples eating habits is difficult, in other words. One reason is money. Healthful foods such as fruits and vegetables, whole grains, lean meats and dairy, can often be pricey. For the cost of a couple of peaches, a person can get a full meal on the dollar menu at a fast-food outlet. Another problem: The produce in stores in low income neighborhoods is often of low quality.
This is a hefty problem, given that 1 in every 3 children and adults is overweight or obese. Policy-makers and health-food advocates across the country are developing programs to increase access to healthful foodsand make it easier for people to buy them.
Here's a look at some of them:
-- Earlier this week, First Lady Michelle Obama introduced the California FreshWorks Fund, a $200-million partnership between the California Endowment and grocers, healthcare organizations and financial institutions. The project is meant to promote development of grocery stores, farmers markets, gardening programs and other solutions to increase access to high-quality, healthful foods in areas with limited availability (so-called food deserts). Retailers that offer a greater selection of healthful foods and sell less junk food will get easier access to the grants. Organizers said they hoped the program would create 6,000 jobs in California.
(Excerpt) Read more at articles.latimes.com ...
You can buy 50 lbs of this high grade rice for $32.00.
Secondly, the answer isn't Billions for "Nutrition Education" either. The reason a poor person becomes obese is the same for anyone else: eating garbage, not exercising, and then eating some more.
Third, the reason there are less grocery stores in urban black areas is not because businesses do not wish to make money or to locate there. There are less stores there because they get robbed blind by their customers.
Take on that issue Moochelle!
I remember working in a "welfare" strip mall when I was in high school. It was incredible how much theft and attempted theft was going on 24/7 by the patrons. We used to have to tape the butter packages closed with heavy duty strapping tape, because they would switch the sticks of butter in margarine packages on a daily basis.
With Trillions spent on Food Stamps and every kind of welfare, no one is going hungry. On the contrary, we are the only generation in human history to have "fat poor people."
Finally, can you believe Moochelle! She wants $200 Million to start this ridiculous program, when we are $14400000000000 in debt?
This is what poverty looked like during the Great Depression:
This is what poverty looks like under Obama:
I suspect the reason Moochelle is so into the "obesity" cause is because the single group that is the most obese is black women, and blacks as a race are the most obese. The Obamas are race obsessed, but also government money obsessed, so this is a match made in Marxist heaven.
How obesity has become a part of black culture
Hopefully soon, Wookie Wide Loads credit card will be cancelled.
> Moochelle Want Million$ for Urban Stores
Let the wookie open its own check book.
WAAAGGGHHH!
Grocery store chains don’t operate in ghetto areas because of the shoplifting problems. Pure and simple reason.
We already passed this a couple years ago! Something like a half billion program. Whatever happened to that??
The next president will need a forklift to get her ass out.
Simple solution. And it doesn’t cost anything.
Take out the feel good self esteem and the how to use a condom class’s and put back gym.
LOL So true
I hate these democrat catch phrases... they go on and on:
Food deserts
Redlining
Big Oil
Net neutrality
Global warming/climate change
Right to choose
Economic conditions don’t make a kid fat or thin. You have three types of kids. Kids who play sports, kids who sit at home and do nothing but play video games and kids who are allergic everything under the sun.
All three will eat McDonalds. Two of the three will be fat.
They will not let WAL_MART in Chicago..What a fool...
This from the A Buck A Plate blog. (http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/):
Once we’ve driven the cost of a decent mundane meal under $1, we may wonder what the bottom limit is: how low can we go?
One SWAG at this is to assume a typical adult needs about 2000 calories per day to function. (1200 is the bottom limit for do-nothing metabolism, and we’re not considering lost-at-sea survival scenarios here.) If we ignore nutrition and focus on just filling a belly and having enough energy to keep going, we may choose a cheap grain - rice - and look at what that works out to cost wise.
A 50 lb sack of rice from Costco is about $26. Nutrition data on rice pegs it at 104 calories per dry ounce, requiring 1.2 lbs per day, and working out to $0.208 per meal.
It’s not enjoyable, but in a grind and not looking hard for solutions, looks like at minimum we’ll be shelling out $0.21 per plate just to get by. On the bright side, that’s at least $0.79 to spend on adding flavor & nutrition to that plate: 1/5th basic sustenance, 4/5ths luxuries.
I live in one of these “food deserts” and the picture painted is pure BS. The ones suffering the most from the situation are old people. Mostly old black people.The only time their younger relatives have anything to do with them is on SS check day when they come to mooch or rob them. The grocery stores left this area for good reason
I know a couple who run a grocery in one of the worse areas of Cleveland. They list many issues - shoplifting, costs for security, a narrow range of products are bought (mostly cheap ones, snacks, soda), unreliable employees - they would like to be able to sell out one day, but they know no one would buy their business.
I know a couple who run a grocery in one of the worse areas of Cleveland. They list many issues - shoplifting, costs for security, a narrow range of products are bought (mostly cheap ones, snacks, soda), unreliable employees - they would like to be able to sell out one day, but they know no one would buy their business.
From where? Pigford farms??
Can you say “corruption, fraud, affirmative action and slush money?”
“Access to grocers doesn't improve diets, study finds”
This article published in the Times last week quotes a legitimate study that directly disproves and contradicts every bit of the rational for Michelle Obama’s food initiative
The text of the original article is at the following URL
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/17/health/la-he-food-deserts-20110712
Somehow, I find this quite humorous and quite disturbing at the same time. You just can't make this stuff up. Nice to see that rigorous fact checking is alive and well at the Times Editorial Board.
I see many more contributions to “The Girls of Wal*Mart” calendar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.