Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann`s fund raising very weak
Commentary Magazine ^ | July 15 2011 | Friendofgeorge

Posted on 07/15/2011 1:25:52 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge

The much awaited figures for Michele Bachmann’s fundraising in the second quarter of the fiscal year reported today did nothing to burnish her image as the up and coming Republican. Her total of $2 million raised in the last three months plus two million more shifted from her congressional campaign account illustrated that for all of the progress her candidacy has made in the last several weeks, she seems to lack the infrastructure and staff work that more established hopefuls have already put into place. The high expectations her poll figures have produced means pulling in only $2 million has to be considered something of a disappointment.

Bachmann’s excuses for this showing will center on the fact that at the start of the quarter she barely had a campaign, let alone the sort of organization that would allow her to rake in the big bucks. Her Internet fundraising operation, key to a grass roots populist candidacy such as hers, so far lacks the sophistication and promotional efforts needed for her to harness the energy of enthusiastic Tea Party and conservative Christian backers.

If she can manage to put together a better online effort in the coming months, then she may be able to start raising the big bucks from a broad base of small contributors that could help put the nomination within reach. But if she fails to do so, this shortfall will put a brake on both her momentum and her ability to compete with the cash-rich Mitt Romney.

Having lifted herself from the second tier to leading alternative to the frontrunner in just a few weeks, Bachmann no longer has the ability to fly below the radar. The congresswoman’s fast start has set high expectations that require her to do more than just skate by. If Bachmann’s performance in the Iowa straw poll in August or the next fundraising report again falls short of what we believe a first-tier candidate must do, her hopes will suffer.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alinskytactics; bachmann; campaignsmears; elections; palin; sorostroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: nopardons

Oh I was ;) Gonna be alot worse this go around I imagine.


121 posted on 07/15/2011 8:29:53 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Then you DO know and yes, I figure that when Palin throws her hat into the ring, it WILL get worse here, for the “outs”.


122 posted on 07/15/2011 8:35:33 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Norm Lenhart
I figure that if she announces she's running, about 95% of FR will rejoice making one of the longests series of threads in one day ever.......

And about twenty or so will seethe with indignation......

123 posted on 07/15/2011 8:39:54 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I think the term “Pandemonium” will apply ;)

Yea, I have been glued to FR for every election. There’s always a lot of open warfare for sure, but Palin seems to bring out the worst in her detractors. Not going to be a pretty primary. Once she get the nod though, it’ll probably get even worse around here. I pray it doesn’t and that we can all just get it done.

Just to be clear though, If for some reason Palin does NOT get it, I an NOT going to ‘sit’ it out. Obama has to be dethroned.


124 posted on 07/15/2011 8:42:57 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

And somewhere, one former virulent little troll’s head will explode. But no one will be there to hear it.


125 posted on 07/15/2011 8:45:22 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge
I wish Sarah could see your post!

She can; and she knows all this.

This is why Sarah Palin is confident that she will win; or at least one reason.

126 posted on 07/15/2011 9:09:09 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Yes, it'll be W redux, but much, much LARGER !

You betcha........that thread WILL be bigger than the UNDEAD THREAD and I'll be smilling !

127 posted on 07/15/2011 9:16:25 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Yes, it'll be W redux, but on a much larger scale.

You betcha.....that thread WILL be longer than the UNDEAD THREAD and I'll be smiling a big smile.

128 posted on 07/15/2011 9:18:04 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
The primary/election cycles have grown more and more nasty and vile, every time. I suspect that this time around will be really horrendous.

I know that Obama is losing to a generic GOPer, right now; however, once we have a nominee, it really won't be easy to dethrone crybaby Obama. That's why it just has to be Palin.

129 posted on 07/15/2011 9:21:31 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
The much awaited figures for Michele Bachmann’s fundraising in the second quarter of the fiscal year reported today did nothing to burnish her image as the up and coming Republican. Her total of $2 million raised in the last three months plus two million more shifted from her congressional campaign account illustrated ...

What did I tell you just a couple of days after Rollins attacked Sarah Palin?

I noted that the positive responses on Michele Bachmann's Facebook pages had dropped about 90% in those two days. Her fundraising now reflects an 80% drop from the first quarter.

Of course, someone with a PHD in Statistics from WEB-U would tell us that, "correlation does not imply causality."

130 posted on 07/15/2011 9:22:38 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Detractors aside, I really don’t see any groundswell out there for anyone else. I don’t dislike Bachmann and would vote for her, problems and all, and I like the Herminator. Both have great and very conservative ideas in the big picture. But neither really inspires me to ‘Want’ to vote for them.

I have read Going Rogue and will by the DVD when it’s out but that’s mostly because I want to support her in whatever way I can. I want to see it, but I don’t ‘need’ to.

I like wher her head is at with my pet issue - Enviro/landuse and I like how she deals with idiots. THAT inspires me and makes me want to vote for her AGAIN ;)

The fact that she has so many political enemies is also a biggie. That means that she likely will not roll and be co-opted so easily as a current DC politico.

I am not ashamed to admit, Palin is the only candidate willing and proven able to go toe to toe and slam the media back to where it belongs - Reporting on, not determining policy. The media has far too much influence over the weak minded. She has contempt for them and for good reason.

Lastly, she “IS” a redneck snowbilly hick. And I like that. A LOT. I think the intellectual elite (not that Palin is a dummy, far from it) has proven that Harvard/Yale degrees are about the last thing this country needs governing it.

Actually there’s about a thousand more, but this;ll do for now ;)


131 posted on 07/15/2011 9:48:19 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
When our FFs were around, both Harvard and Yale were primarily colleges that turned out the clergy. Both colleges, as well as other Ivies were far different,for much of America's history, as were the graduates they turned out, than they have been for the past 60 years, or so. And the finished products that they have been churning out, for the past two generations, aren't much to talk about.

The fact of the matter,re candidates, both declared and not, on our side, EXCEPT FOR GOVERNOR PALIN, have NO sizable grassroots backing. There are good reasons for that and good reasons why Palin has a large and deep group behind her.

In truth, I used to be very open towards Bachmann. She's the one who has completely turned me off and it's not just the Rollins thing.

She and Cain have one considerable problem, though Cain's problems ( why NOBODY should vote for him in the primaries ) are many and major. Time was, nobody would ever consider someone running for president with his CV. Just because he has been a successful businessman and a conservative aren't presidential qualifications. Now don't get me wrong, I think that he is genuine and probably a very nice man, but he shouldn't be in the race any more than Trump should have been; though THE DONALD has a far better knowledge of pols than Cain has.

I'm going to get the DVD of the Palin documentary and make sure that I show it to as many people as I possibly can. :-)

132 posted on 07/15/2011 10:08:09 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

What really turned me off to MB as a serious consideration aside from SP was the Birther issue initially. Slapping half the base in the face is not a shrewd move. Rollins finished it. That was moronic in every sense of the word. Campaign against the status quo then hire it? Not bright. But still better out of what’s left than most, even with my considerable problems with her.

Cain, would be top 3 for me at the moment just because he represents a no-bs approach to business, regulation and Sharptonesque race bating crap.

If Palin does in fact get in (and of course I believe strongly that she will) it will come down to Palin/Bachmann (barring further screw ups) or Palin/Perry. That man I do NOT trust. But I’m willing to listen to his ideas. He’ll have to sell me.

But For me, A Palin/West ticket in the big show is the best of all worlds. Hope she drafts him.


133 posted on 07/15/2011 10:29:28 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
I'm not going to discuss, on this thread, my problems with Bachmann, many though they may be. Nor Cain's insurmountable problems, which disqualify him from being president. I'm not going to talk about VEEP picks either.

Lets just stick to the topic and to the facts..........okay?

134 posted on 07/15/2011 10:36:52 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Ah...I am extremely confused. you said the following

“She and Cain have one considerable problem, though Cain’s problems ( why NOBODY should vote for him in the primaries ) are many and major. Time was, nobody would ever consider someone running for president with his CV. Just because he has been a successful businessman and a conservative aren’t presidential qualifications. Now don’t get me wrong, I think that he is genuine and probably a very nice man, but he shouldn’t be in the race any more than Trump should have been; though THE DONALD has a far better knowledge of pols than Cain has. “

And I responded to your statement that MB and Cain have considerable problems and got into qualifications. I responded with what I feel their problems are.

I was under the impression that that’s what we were talking about.


135 posted on 07/15/2011 10:56:39 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
It was, but I realized that we had been hijacking this thread, so decided to put an end to it. We can talk about this stuff privately, or on a more appropriate thread. We shouldn't do to Bachmann supporters what we hate them doing to us, on Palin threads, is all. :-)

Lets let this thread die a peaceful death.

136 posted on 07/15/2011 11:04:23 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Works for me ;)


137 posted on 07/15/2011 11:05:34 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Good..........

You have mail.

138 posted on 07/15/2011 11:14:29 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

AWESOME!!!


139 posted on 07/16/2011 6:30:00 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (DID I MENTION...SARAH PALIN OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

We are in total agreement, could not have said it better


140 posted on 07/16/2011 6:32:37 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (DID I MENTION...SARAH PALIN OR FLIPPIN BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson