Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'I can win': Sarah Palin on Cover of Newsweek
Newsweek via Facebook ^ | Sunday, July 10, 2011, July 18 cover date

Posted on 07/10/2011 10:31:40 AM PDT by kristinn



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; colorbalanceedited; coverstory; editedcontrastedges; newsweek; notrunning; palin; palin2012; palinbostshere; palinbotlovefest; palinbotshere; palinkoolaidfactory; sarahpalin; shesrunning; whenpalinbotsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 901-906 next last
To: SideoutFred

I think Christie would be a magnificent candidate, and wish he would get in the race. There is still time.....


561 posted on 07/11/2011 11:43:40 AM PDT by La Enchiladita (It should be illegal for illegals to play with matches... just sayin'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
There is nothing "deranged" about not liking any particular politician. Quite the opposite actually. Skepticism of ALL politicians is a healthy thing, no matter what their individual points of view.

But she's not a politician. She's me! (Oh, wait, that was Christine O'Nutcase...)

Uh, I mean, she's one of us! </sarc>


So yes, I'm skeptical of Palin. You betcha. So far she's shown me nothing of substance to get excited about. Yes, she's a political conservative, but that's not enough for me. I set the bar for my vote much higher than mere ideology.

You're not alone. My mind is still open, but she's got a lot of convincing to do (not just convincing me, but the electorate in general).

562 posted on 07/11/2011 11:43:48 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita; SideoutFred
RE :”I think Christie would be a magnificent candidate, and wish he would get in the race. There is still time.....

I really like Christie and I like Walker but I agree with Christies decision not to run for POTUS right now. New governors like them need to serve their (first) terms to completion and then get re-elected after the budget cuts and tax cuts are shown to be a success, and then they will be powerful forces as well as examples of success that we need. It is not their time yet and it does not make me happy to accept this.

Christie as governor of a liberal state will attract a deal criticism for some of his positions, ones that I wont mention now since he is not running for POTUS. Something to keep in mind.

563 posted on 07/11/2011 11:54:54 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
I have a very nice life, but thank you so much for your interest.

As for being negative, please explain how stating the simple fact that McGreevy, Spitzer and Palin(™) are the only US governors in more than a century to quit before the end of their first term is either negative or positive. Please be specific.

And again, thanks for your interest in my personal life.

564 posted on 07/11/2011 12:02:50 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
I have a very nice life, but thank you so much for your interest.

As for being negative, please explain how stating the simple fact that McGreevy, Spitzer and Palin(™) are the only US governors in more than a century to quit before the end of their first term is either negative or positive. Please be specific.

And again, thanks for your interest in my personal life.

565 posted on 07/11/2011 12:02:50 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I hear ya. Your rationale makes sense but I am viewing the current situation as an emergency. :):)

Christie has a slightly populist feel, which I think America can relate to and would welcome after the frosty loftiness of Ubama.


566 posted on 07/11/2011 12:07:31 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (It should be illegal for illegals to play with matches... just sayin'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

” And again, thanks for your interest in my personal life. “

You forgot to say goodbye, and hang up ;-)


567 posted on 07/11/2011 12:18:07 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

You exposed the REAL trolls. Good job!


568 posted on 07/11/2011 12:19:31 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
RE :”I hear ya. Your rationale makes sense but I am viewing the current situation as an emergency. :):)

Are things really that bad ?? LOL, just teasing you :)

It was just my opinion, I don't have any problems with you calling on him to run. Some like to post that they want DeMint to run, yet I know for sure he is not running either. Christie has his hands full in NY, home of the Soprano's.

I figure (national) Republicans may lose another unlosable race. I see little to inspire me there. Christie and Walker are inspiring.

569 posted on 07/11/2011 12:19:31 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Real hope comes from realizing how God has blessed our exceptional nation, and then doing something about it. We have been blessed with natural resources, hardworking entrepreneurs, and a Constitution that preserves the greatest form of government ever devised by man. If we develop those natural resources, allow our entrepreneurs to keep and invest more of what they earn, and adhere to the time-tested truths of our Constitution, we will prosper and endure.



Run, Sarah. Run!
click the pic

570 posted on 07/11/2011 12:28:29 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
RE :”You exposed the REAL trolls. Good job!

It was one hell of a coincidence those three (two to defend the sleeper) all showing up at nearly the same time to join in together on the name calling-fest attack, and the throwing of baseless accusations,

Their lesson book says :
” Rule 1 of ’of attack and destroy’ posting:
Always falsely accuse those that you are attacking of doing the same as you do every day and to them, to give you the appearance of a moral justification. If you mug an old lady with two other helpers holding her down, accuse her of being the mugger

571 posted on 07/11/2011 12:29:58 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: Aria; wtc911
Sarah was hounded from office by rats - who could have cared less about what they were doing to their own state - and figured they couldn’t lose. Sue her to death and bankrupt her, paralyze the workings of state government, then use the fact that she couldn’t get anything done against her. You gonna let them get away with that???? You going to play their game, be their mouthpiece????

Her defenders like to say that she quit because of the lawsuits.

In her resignation speech, Palin (™) mentions the lawsuits but doesn't give that as the reason for her resignation.

From the resignation speech of Sarah Palin (™):

And so as I thought about this announcement that I wouldn’t run for re-election and what it means for Alaska, I thought about how much fun some governors have as lame ducks… travel around the state, to the Lower 48 (maybe), overseas on international trade – as so many politicians do. And then I thought – that’s what’s wrong – many just accept that lame duck status, hit the road, draw the paycheck, and “milk it”. I’m not putting Alaska through that – I promised efficiencies and effectiveness! ? That’s not how I am wired. I am not wired to operate under the same old “politics as usual.” I promised that four years ago – and I meant it.

You can read the full transcript here and watch the speech here: Part1 Part2

I don't know how you can claim lame duck status when you have 16 months left in your term.

A few months later with Bill O'Reilly, she again cited the "lame duck" status as her reason for quitting.

572 posted on 07/11/2011 12:58:25 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: All

She has my vote.


573 posted on 07/11/2011 1:01:09 PM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
There is little doubt in my mind that SP is probably the best person this side of the fence to lead our country out of the man-caused disaster sitting in the WH.

That being said, there are at least three other current or potential candidates that I would work for and donate to.

Then the second tier, I could stomach but could not bring myself to work for, let alone actively support. Of the whole bunch, there is only one I could not vote for: his Romness, the only person this side of pond that could get O re-elected.

I am not a sufferer of PWS. I do understand some of the concerns of many who frequently post to the negative on pro-Palin posts, AKA PDSers. Therefor, I would suggest that, as far as FR goes, let us assume that SP is nominated. The best plan in such case is to have a great #2 ready to take over if their "she quit" argument has any value.

What seems obvious is the following list for VP, in my order of choice: 1. Rick Perry, if he would accept the second seat. 2. Herman Cain, same as RP, but likely more receptive. 3. Michele Bachmann, already running for VP, but not as trustworthy.

I know many will suggest any of several others, but as part of her cabinet, I see John Bolton as SoS, Rudy as AG, West as SecDef and either Cain or Ryan at Treasury. Next tier, Senate Majority leader and (surprise), Gingrich as speaker.

574 posted on 07/11/2011 1:05:47 PM PDT by fantail 1952 (Truth is a virus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

” don’t know how you can claim lame duck status when you have 16 months left in your term. “

I would really like to hear that myself ;-)


575 posted on 07/11/2011 1:06:58 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

See image at 570. How is it any different from the Newsweek cover?


576 posted on 07/11/2011 1:12:00 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal
0bama has aged about 12 years in 2, which is strange given that he has no conscience.

Demonic possession. It's very hard on the body.

577 posted on 07/11/2011 1:13:34 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Regarding your speed display plus camera method, it doesn't matter how low tech the "automation" is, or what the distribution of the parts looks like, or how the information is conveyed to the secondary, not-present-at-the-scene human observers. Robocop, by any other name, still fails constitutional muster as the accuser under the 6th. That hard truth is why municipalities are in fact going with the dual penalty system. That’s a reality you could check out for yourself if you were so motivated.

As for your burglary example, in Alaska, non-violent felonies do time out in 5 years. Delayed discovery won’t help you if you wait too long. For example, if you "discover" a nonviolent burglary six years after it happened, even if the reason you discovered it was they send you a digital photo of themselves in the act in your home, they are going to get off scott free. Sorry. It’s true. Not pretty, I know, but the law is designed that way on purpose, to prevent the grave injustice of perpetual liability of the kind you are proposing for good people with bad, persistent enemies, like, for example, Governor Palin.

But all of this is academic, because the statute defines its subjects clearly as current public officers, and specifically excludes former public officers. See AS 39.52.910(a). What I am not seeing from your side of the bench, counselor, is even the most primitive recognition of that fact. Why? Because if you once admit that part of the statute into the discussion, it utterly destroys your premise.

So instead, you torment me with purported deficiencies in my speeding analogies, and you use arguably unconstitutional practices to do so! What I’d like to see, what would make me feel we were having a real conversation instead of a shout-fest, is just some hint of a clue that you understand that the statute has gone out of it’s way to make sure the reader knows it is intentionally limiting the effect of all its provisions, including discovery, to current public officers exclusively, unless otherwise stated. See AS 39.52.910.

578 posted on 07/11/2011 1:47:03 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Windflier; Norm Lenhart
It was one hell of a coincidence those three (two to defend the sleeper) all showing up at nearly the same time to join in together on the name calling-fest attack, and the throwing of baseless accusations

LOL. This guy has a paranoid streak wider than the KOS posters.......

But just so he knows the truth.....muahahahaha.......he should know that Soros calls us direct (after giving us new cars), so that we can immediately come on the threads to bash poor, innocent never said a snarky or bad word about Palin and her supporters, SOL.

Once he (Soros) dials up his secret decoder, the three of us chant Sarah's name several times (in unison) first, then come on and try to malign, lie and misconstrue poor old innocent sickolib for the liberal cause.

Dang it, he found out too......that SOL is one amazingly savvy poster........

:-)

579 posted on 07/11/2011 2:21:30 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Her campaign missed the Texas deadline last year

Which deadline is that? My info says the GOP primary filing deadline for Texas is next January. It's just a quick look, so it could be wrong. Do you have a source?

580 posted on 07/11/2011 2:26:22 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 901-906 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson